The floor on the art's height passed locally at 114 and failed in CI at
64. Both numbers are honest and neither is about this change: the e2e
app is long-lived, so a job staged by an earlier spec is still on
screen, and the volume control renders here where it does not on
Android. Both are chrome above and below the view, and both move the
leftover.
So the claim is stated as what the reflow does rather than as what it
measures -- in a row the art is bounded by the row's height and fills
it, where in a column it is the leftover after the names. That is the
mechanism behind 53px to 143px, and it fails on the old build with
"there is no row to fill". The device numbers stay on #51, which is the
only tier that can honestly produce them.
This is the second draft of that assertion to be thrown away; the first
compared the art against the column's leftover and passed on the defect,
because the subtraction goes negative exactly when the names are taller
than the art.
Also stops the arrangement wait from requiring the row to exist, so
reverting the component to check that these tests bite still produces
the crop measurements -- 263x39, 358x315, 300x36 -- rather than eight
timeouts. 5 of 8 fail on the build before this change.
logan
ce9951b93a