Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
yonlu d414fdb2b6 docs: a CI-only change is ci:, not fix(ci):
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m25s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m24s
The commit-analyzer reads the type and ignores the scope, so `fix` is a
patch whatever sits in the brackets. Two commits touching nothing but
.gitea/workflows/unclaim.yml were written `fix(ci):` and cut v0.2.1 and
v0.2.2 -- real releases, published to Arch, Homebrew and the APK
registry, containing no user-facing change.

CLAUDE.md already warned that a mistyped feat ships a minor version.
That was not enough, because this was not a mistyped type: `fix` was
chosen deliberately, in the belief that the (ci) scope qualified it.

The version bump is the small half, which is why this gets a paragraph
rather than a clause. A merge to main starts two workflows; if
release.yml then pushes a tag, that tag push starts four more --
arch-package, homebrew-formula, android-apk and desktop-assets -- on a
runner with capacity 1, where the APK build alone is tens of minutes
and publishes a signed artifact to a public registry. So a mistyped
type is six workflow runs, not an odd-looking changelog.

`make release-dry` answers this before the merge instead of after, and
is cheaper than any one of those runs.

The two releases are staying: they are already published, and a version
that vanishes is worse for whoever pulled it than one that turns out to
be empty.

Closes #111
2026-08-18 19:40:43 -04:00
yonlu bf0a53e64c Merge pull request 'Give the unclaim step a CA bundle' (#110) from fix/unclaim-ca-certs into main
Release / release (push) Successful in 31s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 6m3s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m22s
Build & publish the Android APK / apk (push) Successful in 1m24s
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m29s
Attach the desktop build to the release / linux (push) Successful in 52s
Sync Homebrew formula / sync-formula (push) Successful in 6s
Reviewed-on: #110
2026-08-18 23:30:31 +00:00
yonlu 7be4a02e31 fix(ci): give the unclaim step a CA bundle
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m27s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m14s
Second defect in the same workflow. The shell fix took -- the step ran
under `bash --noprofile --norc -e -o pipefail` -- and got one layer
further before failing:

  curl: (77) error setting certificate file: /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt

ubuntu:24.04 ships no CA bundle, and --no-install-recommends skips the
ca-certificates that curl recommends, so curl came up unable to verify
TLS against our own Gitea.

This was avoidable by reading the repo rather than reasoning about it:
ci.yml (twice), desktop-assets.yml, android-apk.yml and release.yml all
spell out `ca-certificates curl ... jq` for exactly this reason. The
convention was written down five times already.

Validated in the real image this time rather than by extracting the
script and running it on the host, which is what missed this: the step
now succeeds inside `docker run ubuntu:24.04` against a scratch issue --
label present, 204, label gone -- and the previous version reproduces
`curl: (77)` in the same image. Both checked, then the scratch issue was
deleted.

The DELETE also keeps its response body now and prints it on a non-204.
Whether the automatic token carries issue-write scope is still unproven,
because both failures happened before the API call, and "403" without
Gitea's own sentence would cost another merge to interpret.

Closes #102
2026-08-18 19:08:50 -04:00
yonlu ad9c25a5a2 Merge pull request 'Run the unclaim step under bash' (#108) from fix/unclaim-shell into main
Release / release (push) Successful in 32s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 6m10s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m23s
Build & publish the Android APK / apk (push) Successful in 1m23s
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m37s
Attach the desktop build to the release / linux (push) Successful in 52s
Sync Homebrew formula / sync-formula (push) Successful in 7s
Reviewed-on: #108
2026-08-18 23:05:38 +00:00
yonlu a83a127e31 fix(ci): run the unclaim step under bash
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m28s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m14s
The workflow shipped in #103 and failed on every close, on its second
line, before reaching the API:

  shell: sh -e {0}
  /var/run/act/workflow/0.sh: 2: set: Illegal option -o pipefail

Inside `container:` the act runner selects sh, not bash, and
`set -o pipefail` is a bashism. homebrew-formula.yml carries the same
line without trouble because it runs with no container, on the host
image where bash is the default -- so "another workflow does it" was
not the evidence it looked like, and the comment now says so where the
next person will read it.

pipefail is kept rather than dropped for POSIX's sake: the lookup is
`curl -sSf ... | jq`, so without it an API error yields empty output,
an empty label id, and a cheerful "nothing to do" on every close. A
silent no-op is the one outcome worse than a failing job here.

Validated end to end against scratch issues rather than by reading it:
with the label present the step returns 204 and the label is gone, and
against an issue that never carried it the step also returns 204 and
exits 0 -- which is what makes it safe to run on every close rather
than only claimed ones.

Still untested: whether secrets.GITEA_TOKEN carries issue-write scope.
The old run never got far enough to find out. If it 403s, the fix is
one line -- secrets.PACKAGE_TOKEN, which is a user PAT.

Closes #102
2026-08-18 18:54:39 -04:00
yonlu e049a71458 Merge pull request 'Drop the claim label when an issue closes' (#103) from ci/unclaim-on-close into main
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m30s
Release / release (push) Successful in 31s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 6m6s
Reviewed-on: #103
2026-08-18 21:57:11 +00:00
yonlu 0c944f2382 ci: drop the claim label when an issue closes
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m27s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m17s
A `Closes #N` footer closes the issue on merge and leaves
`Status/In Progress` on it, because Gitea's auto-close touches state
and nothing else. #100 was closed and simultaneously marked as being
actively worked on. `scripts/issue.sh close` does drop the label, and
is exactly the call the footer exists to avoid making.

This hooks the close rather than the merge. Stripping the label in the
PR would work and would be a per-PR habit, which is what the footer
removed in the first place; `issues: [closed]` covers the footer,
issue.sh close and a click in the web UI alike, and asks nothing of
anyone at any of them.

Reopening deliberately does not restore the label: reopening says the
work was not finished, not that somebody is at a keyboard now.

Two costs, both stated in the file rather than discovered later. The
runner has capacity 1 and is shared with an index build that can hold
it for three hours, so this is not instant -- stale for an afternoon
beats stale forever, which is what it was. And it is an eighth
workflow, so CLAUDE.md's count moves with it.

The audit stays, because a workflow that silently stops firing is the
failure mode this area has already produced once:

  ./scripts/issue.sh list --state closed --label "Status/In Progress"

Closes #102
2026-08-18 17:36:05 -04:00
yonlu 75525b67e4 Merge pull request 'Put the closing keyword where Gitea will actually read it' (#101) from docs/closing-keyword into main
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m27s
Release / release (push) Successful in 31s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 6m15s
Reviewed-on: #101
2026-08-18 21:30:35 +00:00
yonlu 85768dc489 docs: put the closing keyword where Gitea will actually read it
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m27s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m7s
CLAUDE.md said the Closes list was unreliable and to close by hand. It
is unreliable for a specific reason, and the rule can say what works.

Gitea parses commit messages that reach main. It does not parse the PR
body, which closes something only if the merge happens to copy it into
the merge commit message. Both halves were measured here: #83's merge
commit carried "Closes #9, #13, #14, ..." and closed five of the ten,
because a comma list is only partially matched; #93's merge commit body
was a lone Reviewed-on: trailer, so #92 stayed open behind a perfectly
correct Closes line in the PR description.

So the keyword goes in the commit body as a footer, one issue per line.
That costs nothing elsewhere -- Conventional Commits allows a footer,
commit-check only regexes the subject, and semantic-release reads the
type from the subject, so no release decision changes. The existing
rule that the issue number stays out of the subject is untouched and
was never about the body.

The verification step stays, because a squash or a hand-edited merge
message still drops the footer.

This commit is the experiment: if #98 and #100 close when this branch
merges without anyone touching them, the mechanism is confirmed.

Closes #98
Closes #100
2026-08-18 17:15:28 -04:00
yonlu 1a221a40d3 Merge pull request 'Delete four documents that contradict the code' (#99) from docs/retire-stale-planning-docs into main
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m26s
Release / release (push) Successful in 29s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 6m14s
Reviewed-on: #99
2026-08-18 21:06:59 +00:00
yonlu 0821deb877 Merge branch 'main' into docs/retire-stale-planning-docs
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m26s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m17s
2026-08-18 20:55:52 +00:00
yonlu 31ada14111 docs: delete four documents that contradict the code
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m27s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m9s
They do not merely lag it, they contradict it, which is worse than
absent: the only way to find out one is wrong is to trust it.

docs/dev/roadmap.md, 1648 lines. Its "Current State" describes an app
with basic playback, a track list and an album grid. Phases 1, 2, 3 and
5 have shipped entire -- playlists, shuffle and repeat, shortcuts,
virtualised lists, search, custom columns, smart playlists, the
MusicBrainz client, autotag. Its Decision Log records "Testing:
Deferred" against 836 Vitest tests, a Playwright suite on two engines
and race-detector passes in three build configurations.

.pi/journal.md, "what happened and what's next", frozen at plan 005 and
still saying everything from phase 1 onward is uncommitted. That is the
tracker's job now, and a work log that is wrong about what is committed
is a hazard rather than a stale file.

docs/dev/overview.md, a shallower and partly incorrect CLAUDE.md
architecture section. README pointed at it and points at CLAUDE.md now.

docs/dev/config-suggestions.md, eight suggestions of which one survived
-- the rest were overtaken by rewrites: applyDefaults exists, scan
concurrency is configurable with SSD/HDD detection, and httphandler.go
and the WriteHeader-after-render bug it described are gone entirely.

Nothing is lost: the genuinely unbuilt work was filed first, as #94
device sync, #95 layout customisation, #96 AcoustID and #97 the config
setters that take no lock.

Refs #98
2026-08-18 16:39:21 -04:00
yonlu 20139394f3 Merge pull request 'Make the issue tracker the source of truth' (#93) from docs/issue-driven-workflow into main
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m27s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 6m14s
Release / release (push) Successful in 30s
Reviewed-on: #93
2026-08-18 20:35:44 +00:00
7 changed files with 175 additions and 2024 deletions
+107
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
name: Unclaim
# A `Closes #N` footer in a commit body closes the issue on merge — and
# leaves `Status/In Progress` on it, because Gitea's auto-close touches
# state and nothing else. So #100 was closed and simultaneously marked
# as being actively worked on, and `scripts/issue.sh close` (which does
# drop the label) is exactly the thing the footer exists to avoid
# calling.
#
# **This hooks the close, not the merge.** Stripping the label in the
# PR would work and would be a per-PR habit; habits are what the footer
# removed. `issues: [closed]` covers every path an issue can close by —
# the footer on merge, `issue.sh close`, someone clicking Close in the
# web UI — and asks nothing of anyone at any of them.
#
# **Reopening deliberately does not restore it.** Reopening says the
# work was not finished, not that somebody is at a keyboard doing it
# now; the claim gets re-made by whoever picks it up.
#
# **This is not instant, and should not be described as it.** The
# runner has capacity 1 and is shared with an index build that can hold
# it for three hours, so a label tweak can queue behind one. Stale for
# an afternoon beats stale forever, which is what it was.
#
# The audit that answers "is this still firing" stays in CLAUDE.md and
# is one command:
#
# ./scripts/issue.sh list --state closed --label "Status/In Progress"
#
# A workflow that silently stops working is the failure mode this whole
# area has already produced once.
on:
issues:
types: [closed]
jobs:
unclaim:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
container:
image: ubuntu:24.04
steps:
- name: Drop the claim label
# **Inside a container the act runner selects `sh`, not bash**, so
# `set -o pipefail` fails the job on its second line with "Illegal
# option" and the step never reaches the API. `homebrew-formula.yml`
# carries the same `set -euo pipefail` without trouble because it
# runs with **no container**, on the host image where bash is the
# default — so "another workflow does it" is not evidence here.
shell: bash
env:
# The automatic Actions token, as release.yml uses for the
# floor tag. It needs no more than write access to this repo.
TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITEA_TOKEN }}
API: ${{ github.server_url }}/api/v1/repos/${{ github.repository }}
ISSUE: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
run: |
set -euo pipefail
# `ca-certificates` is named because `--no-install-recommends`
# skips it, and `ubuntu:24.04` ships no CA bundle of its own —
# so curl comes up unable to verify TLS against our own Gitea
# and fails with "error setting certificate file" (exit 77).
# Every other containerised workflow here spells it out for the
# same reason; this one did not, and cost a release cycle.
apt-get update -qq
apt-get install -y -qq --no-install-recommends \
ca-certificates curl jq >/dev/null
label_id=$(
curl -sSf -H "Authorization: token $TOKEN" "$API/labels?limit=100" |
jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "Status/In Progress") | .id'
)
# The label not existing is a repo somebody reorganised, not a
# failure of this run — say so and stop, rather than failing a
# job on every close from then on.
if [ -z "$label_id" ]; then
echo "unclaim: no 'Status/In Progress' label in this repo; nothing to do"
exit 0
fi
# DELETE is idempotent here: an issue that never carried the
# label answers the same as one that did, which is what makes
# this safe to run on *every* close rather than only the ones
# that were claimed.
# The body is captured, not discarded, so a refusal is
# diagnosable from this log alone. Whether the automatic
# token carries issue-write scope is still unproven, and
# "DELETE returned 403" without Gitea's own sentence costs
# another merge to find out which of the two it is.
body=$(mktemp)
code=$(
curl -sS -o "$body" -w '%{http_code}' -X DELETE \
-H "Authorization: token $TOKEN" \
"$API/issues/$ISSUE/labels/$label_id"
)
case "$code" in
204) echo "unclaim: #$ISSUE is closed and unclaimed" ;;
*)
echo "unclaim: DELETE returned $code for #$ISSUE" >&2
cat "$body" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
-118
View File
@@ -1,118 +0,0 @@
# Work log
Temporal memory: what happened and what's next. Structure lives in
`CLAUDE.md`, operational instructions in `.pi/skills/yellowjacket-dev/`,
measured discoveries in `.planning/NOTES.md`. Don't duplicate those here.
## Current state
Plan 005 (agent development harness) is **complete — all seven
phases**. Everything from phase 1 onward is still **uncommitted**: one
large but coherent working-tree diff, nothing pushed.
All four tiers verified green from a cold, cleaned state:
`make ui-test` 313 passed, `make lint` 0 issues × 3 configurations,
`make test` green × 3 passes, `make e2e` 19 passed. Both CI jobs
verified green in a bare `ubuntu:24.04` container, including 19/19 on
WebKit.
**Committed and pushed** as `5ca6cad` (the harness) + `ccacd67` (a CI
fix), and **green on the real runner**: job `check` ~4 min, job `e2e`
~3 min with 19/19 chromium *and* 19/19 webkit. One commit rather than
seven because the working tree was the end state, not per-phase
snapshots — `Makefile`, `CLAUDE.md` and `lefthook.yml` are touched by
nearly every phase, so a split would have been fabricated history.
Still unverified, because no run has failed yet: the
`actions/upload-artifact` step (`continue-on-error`, so it cannot mask
a real failure) and whether pnpm honours `npm_config_store_dir` for
store caching. Worth checking the next time a spec legitimately fails.
- [ ] `gitea_ci`'s `job_logs` returns 404 on Gitea 1.27.1 — the endpoint
is not exposed. Logs come from the VPS instead: `zstdcat` the file
under `gitea/actions_log/<owner>/<repo>/<xx>/<task_id>.log.zst`,
and note `zstdcat` is not in the gitea container, so
`docker cp` it out first. Job status is `action_run_job.status`
(1 success, 2 failure, 4 skipped, 5 waiting, 6 running).
Probably belongs in the `gitea` skill, not here.
Open items deliberately not fixed: WAV tags are write-only
(`TestWAVTagsAreNotReadableYet`), `themeStore.loadFromBackend`'s failure
handler cannot recover, `backend/playlist` has no CRUD suite.
## Log
### 2026-08-11 — cold skill run, then phase 7 (CI)
- **Followed the skill cold first**, as the last session asked. It
works: app up from a wiped `.dev/`, an undocumented flow driven
(queue panel + shuffle, asserted on `QueueModeChanged`), stopped —
~1 minute, no dead ends. One real config bug: `outputDir` in
`.playwright/cli.config.json` resolves against **cwd**, not the
config file's directory (only `initScript` does that), so snapshots
were landing above the repo and a *stale* one from the previous
session answered `ls -t` instead. That cost a DOM walk to disprove a
regression that did not exist. Four smaller doc gaps fixed
(`sandbox-seed` already runs `testdata`; `ui-setup`/`e2e-setup` were
undocumented prerequisites; `snapshot` prints a path; `dev-stop`
leaves the browser open), plus `dev-headless.sh`'s own banner, which
was suggesting the bare `window.go` call its next paragraph warns
against.
- **Built both CI jobs as container scripts before writing any YAML**,
then transcribed the YAML back out and re-ran it to prove the
transcription. Push-and-see is a bad loop on a self-hosted runner.
- **It found a real bug immediately**: `make lint` omitted
`webkit2_41` on all three passes, so it was linting configurations
nothing builds. Invisible on Arch (which still ships
`webkit2gtk-4.0.pc`), fatal on Ubuntu 24.04. Tag sets now match
`make test`.
- **Both open decisions settled by measurement**: ALSA `null` PCM for
audio (no daemon; the elapsed clock really advances), dead-address
stub for the explore artifact (and setting it for the *app* run, not
just seeding, is worth 8x on suite wall clock). **WebKit is a
required step** — it had never been run anywhere, so one throwaway
container run replaced a coin flip with 19/19 at +11 s.
### 2026-08-10 — phase 6, pi affordances
- Added `.pi/skills/yellowjacket-dev/` as a directory rather than a flat
file: only the description is always in context, so `SKILL.md` stays
short enough that reading it whole is never a decision, and the deeper
material sits in `references/{harness,fixtures,ui-tier,schema-change}.md`.
- Settled the CLAUDE.md-vs-skill split **grammatically, not topically**,
because a topical split is what rots — every new fact gets two
plausible homes. Three docs, three tenses: NOTES.md is past
(measured, dated, append-only), CLAUDE.md is present (what the system
is), the skill is imperative (what to run). A new paragraph's tense
decides where it goes.
- The five gotchas (binding timeouts, first-run wizard, `pkill -f`,
seeds-by-running, WebKit-is-CI-only) went **inline in SKILL.md**, not
into a reference: you need them before the failure, not after.
- Trimmed CLAUDE.md's "Fixtures and the headless harness" section by
about half — the command sequences and gotchas it was carrying are now
the skill's, and leaving both would have created exactly the duplicate
description this repo has a standing rule against.
- Added `make skill-check` / `scripts/skill-check.sh` + a pre-commit
hook: every command in `.pi/**/*.md` must be a real `make` target, so
the Makefile stays the source of truth for invocation and a renamed
target fails a commit instead of misleading an agent later. Verified
it fails (it caught its own not-yet-created target) and passes.
- Added the `/e2e` prompt template: promoting a hand-driven
`playwright-cli` session into a spec is a transcription with four
fixed substitutions (refs → testids, sleeps → `waitForEvent`, raw
`window.go``callBinding`, short fixture → `LONG_TRACK`), plus three
runs — pass, pass again, pass after a DB restore — because the usual
failure is a spec depending on state the hand-driving left behind.
- One shell trap: under `set -euo pipefail`, `x="$(make -pqRr | …)"`
fails the whole assignment, because `make -q` exits non-zero when a
target is out of date and `pipefail` propagates it.
### Earlier
Phases 15 of plan 005: fixture generator and manifest, headless launch
and seeds, the event bridge + `data-testid` pass + `backend/testctl` +
`e2e/`, the Vitest component tier + `make bindings-check`, and the
`events.Emit` wrapper with its in-process service-event tests. Recaps
and the five "verified end to end" blocks are in
`.planning/plans/active/005-agent-development-harness.md`; the lessons
are in `.planning/NOTES.md`.
+63 -9
View File
@@ -53,14 +53,50 @@ reinvention:
- **Hard blockers are real Gitea dependencies**, which render on the
issue itself, and the blocked issue carries `Status/Blocked`.
- **A PR body carries a commit-to-issue table, the verification
actually run, and a `Closes` list** — PR #83 is the shape.
actually run, and a `Closes` list** — PR #83 is the shape. That list
is for whoever reads the PR; what actually closes an issue is the
footer below.
**And the `Closes` list does not reliably close anything.** #83 listed
ten and five of them stayed open, shipped in `main`, for a fortnight.
So closing is a step you take and check, not a keyword you trust:
`./scripts/issue.sh close <n>` after the merge, with a comment naming
the commit that shipped it. `close` also drops `Status/In Progress`,
because a claim outlives the work if nothing takes the label off.
**The closing keyword goes in the commit body, one issue per line.**
```
docs: delete four documents that contradict the code
<body>
Closes #98
```
**Gitea parses commit messages that reach `main`; it does not parse the
PR body**, which only closes anything if the merge happens to copy it
into the merge commit. Both halves of that were measured. #83's merge
commit carried `Closes #9, #13, #14, …` and closed **five of ten** — a
comma list is partially matched. #93's merge commit body was one
`Reviewed-on:` trailer, so #92 stayed open behind a perfectly correct
`Closes` line in the PR description.
A footer costs nothing elsewhere: Conventional Commits allows one,
`scripts/commit-check.sh` only regexes the subject, and
semantic-release reads the type from the subject — so this changes no
release decision. The rule that the issue number stays out of the
**subject** is unaffected, and was never about the body.
**Check it anyway.** A squash, or a merge message edited by hand,
still drops the footer. `./scripts/issue.sh list --state open` after a
merge, looking for what you just shipped; `./scripts/issue.sh close
<n>` for whatever did not take, with a comment naming the commit.
**Unclaiming is automatic, and it is hooked to the close rather than
to the merge.** Gitea's auto-close changes state and nothing else, so a
footer left `Status/In Progress` on a closed issue — #100 was closed
and marked as being actively worked on at the same time.
`.gitea/workflows/unclaim.yml` runs on `issues: [closed]`, which covers
the footer, `issue.sh close` and a click in the web UI alike; stripping
the label in the PR instead would have been a per-PR habit, and habits
are what the footer removed. It is not instant — the runner has
capacity 1 — and reopening deliberately does not restore the label.
`./scripts/issue.sh list --state closed --label "Status/In Progress"`
is how you find out it has stopped firing.
## Planning
@@ -2102,6 +2138,23 @@ Pre-commit hooks verify generated code is fresh — always run `make generate` a
mistyped `feat` ships a minor version. `make release-dry` answers "what
would this merge release" without pushing.
**The analyzer reads the type and ignores the scope, so a CI-only change
is `ci:` and never `fix(ci):`.** The scope is decoration; `fix` is a
patch whatever is in the brackets. Two commits touching nothing but
`.gitea/workflows/unclaim.yml` were written `fix(ci):` and cut `v0.2.1`
and `v0.2.2` — real releases, published to Arch, Homebrew and the APK
registry, containing no user-facing change. They were left in place
rather than deleted, because a version that vanishes is worse for
whoever pulled it than one that turns out to be empty.
**The blast radius is bigger than the version number**, which is what
makes this worth a paragraph. A merge to `main` starts two workflows;
if `release.yml` then pushes a tag, that tag push starts **four more**
(`arch-package`, `homebrew-formula`, `android-apk`, `desktop-assets`) —
on a runner with capacity 1, where the APK build alone is tens of
minutes. `make release-dry` before merging is how you find out, and it
is cheaper than every one of those.
**`@semantic-release/github` is not in that config and must not be.**
Gitea's API is `/api/v1` and is not GitHub's surface, so
`@semantic-release/exec` calls `scripts/gitea-release.sh` instead — one
@@ -2150,10 +2203,11 @@ Pre-commit runs vet, lint, codegen check, and frontend typecheck in parallel. Pr
## CI
Seven workflows in `.gitea/workflows/`. Five of them package and
Eight workflows in `.gitea/workflows/`. Five of them package and
publish (`arch-package`, `homebrew-formula`, `index-artifact`,
`android-apk`, `desktop-assets`); `release.yml` decides *whether* four of
those run at all; only `ci.yml` gates, and it is the one to look at when
those run at all; `unclaim.yml` is housekeeping on the tracker and
touches no code; only `ci.yml` gates, and it is the one to look at when
deciding whether a push was healthy.
**`release.yml` is the entry point for all of it.** On every push to
+5 -2
View File
@@ -106,5 +106,8 @@ make dev # run with hot-reload
make build-prod # produce a release binary
```
More detail for contributors lives in
[`docs/dev/overview.md`](./docs/dev/overview.md) and [`CLAUDE.md`](./CLAUDE.md).
More detail for contributors lives in [`CLAUDE.md`](./CLAUDE.md) — the
architecture, the conventions and the reasons behind them. What is
being worked on is [the issue
tracker](https://git.ljones.me/yonlu/yellowjacket/issues); #73 is the
roadmap.
-194
View File
@@ -1,194 +0,0 @@
# Config Improvement Suggestions
Remaining suggestions for improving the configuration system in YellowJacket.
## 2. Thread Safety Concerns
The current `Config` struct lacks synchronization:
- `Load()` and `Save()` can race with concurrent reads
- `handleConfigUpdate()` in library mutates `l.conf.DirectoryPath` without locks
**Suggestion:** Add a `sync.RWMutex` to protect config access, especially if config is read during scans.
```go
type Config struct {
mu sync.RWMutex
ctx context.Context
logger *slog.Logger
// ...
}
func (c *Config) Load() error {
c.mu.Lock()
defer c.mu.Unlock()
// ...
}
```
## 3. Nil Safety in Validation
In `config.go`, validation only runs if `c.Library != nil`, but `handleConfigPost` dereferences `postedConfig.Library` without checking for nil:
```go
if postedConfig.Library != nil {
c.Library = postedConfig.Library
// ...
}
```
**Status:** Partially addressed in the event refactor, but consider adding explicit nil checks in `Validate()` as well.
## 4. Inconsistent Error Handling on HTTP Responses
In `httphandler.go:28-31`, `WriteHeader` is called *after* rendering the error template, which won't work as expected (headers must be set before writing body):
```go
c.formSubmitError(err.Error()).Render(r.Context(), w)
w.WriteHeader(http.StatusInternalServerError) // Too late!
```
**Fix:** Set the status code before rendering:
```go
w.WriteHeader(http.StatusInternalServerError)
c.formSubmitError(err.Error()).Render(r.Context(), w)
```
## 5. Make `scanWorkerCount` Configurable
There's a TODO at `library.go:289`:
```go
// TODO: make configurable via Config.
var scanWorkerCount = goruntime.NumCPU()
```
**Suggestion:** Add this to `library.Config`:
```go
type Config struct {
DirectoryPath Directory `form:"Directory" schema:"directory,required"`
ScanWorkers int `form:"ScanWorkers" schema:"scan_workers"`
}
```
Then in `NewLibrary()` or `Scan()`:
```go
workers := l.conf.ScanWorkers
if workers <= 0 {
workers = goruntime.NumCPU()
}
```
## 6. Consider Config Defaults
Currently if no config exists, an empty one is saved. Consider providing sensible defaults (e.g., common music directories like `~/Music`).
```go
func (c *Config) setDefaults() {
if c.Library == nil {
c.Library = &library.Config{}
}
if c.Library.DirectoryPath == "" {
// Try common music directories
home, _ := os.UserHomeDir()
musicDir := filepath.Join(home, "Music")
if info, err := os.Stat(musicDir); err == nil && info.IsDir() {
c.Library.DirectoryPath = library.Directory(musicDir)
}
}
}
```
## 7. Config Reload/Watch Capability
The config is only loaded at startup. Consider adding:
- File watcher for external config changes (using `fsnotify`)
- Explicit reload method callable from UI
```go
func (c *Config) Watch() error {
watcher, err := fsnotify.NewWatcher()
if err != nil {
return err
}
go func() {
for event := range watcher.Events {
if event.Op&fsnotify.Write == fsnotify.Write {
c.Load()
// Emit event for listeners
}
}
}()
return watcher.Add(c.filePath)
}
```
## 8. Validation Should Return Structured Errors
Currently validation returns combined errors. Consider returning a structured validation result that the UI can map to specific fields for better user feedback.
```go
type ValidationError struct {
Field string
Message string
}
type ValidationResult struct {
Valid bool
Errors []ValidationError
}
func (c *Config) ValidateStructured() ValidationResult {
var result ValidationResult
result.Valid = true
if c.Library != nil {
if err := c.Library.Validate(); err != nil {
result.Valid = false
result.Errors = append(result.Errors, ValidationError{
Field: "Library.DirectoryPath",
Message: err.Error(),
})
}
}
return result
}
```
## 9. Use Standard Library for Config Paths
The path construction in `system/userdata.go` doesn't respect `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME` on Linux or use the standard Go `os.UserConfigDir()`.
**Current implementation:**
```go
case "linux":
return fmt.Sprintf("/home/%s/%s/yellowjacket", username, unixSubdirs[dt]), nil
```
**Suggested improvement:**
```go
func GetUserConfigDirPath() (string, error) {
baseDir, err := os.UserConfigDir() // Respects XDG_CONFIG_HOME
if err != nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("could not get user config directory: %w", err)
}
path := filepath.Join(baseDir, "yellowjacket")
if err := os.MkdirAll(path, 0o755); err != nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("could not create config directory: %w", err)
}
return path, nil
}
```
This approach:
- Respects `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME` on Linux
- Uses proper macOS paths (`~/Library/Application Support`)
- Uses `%AppData%` on Windows
- Is more portable and follows platform conventions
-53
View File
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
# Development Overview
YellowJacket is a moderately complex application. This document gives an overview of how development of it works.
## Logical Breakdown
YellowJacket can be thought about in a heirarchy of logical modules and components. The borders of these logical sections are mostly represented in the code and directory structure as well.
- Frontend
- UI Components (see [Lit](###lit-web-components))
- Backend
- App
- Asset Handler
- Logging
- System
- Player
- Library
- Config
- Database
- Queries (see [sqlc](###sqlc))
## Dependencies
YellowJacket uses many tools and libraries to provide its functionality.
This section lists each of these dependencies and explains how they are used.
### [Wails](https://wails.io)
Used to create desktop apps with Go and web technologies.
### [SQLite](https://github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3?tab=readme-ov-file#go-sqlite3)
Used for local database.
### [sqlc](https://sqlc.dev/)
Used to generate Go code from SQL.
### [Templ](https://templ.guide/)
Used to generate HTML templates with Go code.
### [Beep](https://github.com/gopxl/beep?tab=readme-ov-file#beep)
Used for audio playback.
### [Lit Web Components](https://lit.dev/)
Used for dynamic/reactive frontend components.
### [HTMX](https://htmx.org/)
Used for requesting HTML fragments from the backend and rendering them on the frontend.
-1648
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff