TestCacheTTLExpiry set a 1s TTL and immediately asserted a hit, so it
depended on an upper bound of elapsed wall-clock time between Set and
Get. Nothing can promise that: on the capacity-1 runner, with the rest
of the suite running in parallel, the goroutine can be descheduled for
longer than the TTL and the entry is then correctly gone.
It failed that way on this PR while passing five times out of five
locally, and it touches no code this branch changed.
Two entries now: one with an hour to live carries the presence
assertions, one with a second carries the expiry. Sleeping past a TTL
is always safe, so only the direction that cannot flake is timed.
main is protected (enable_push: false, empty whitelist), so
@semantic-release/git's commit-back is rejected by the pre-receive
hook -- and it would be rejected *after* the tag was pushed, leaving a
tagged release the run then reports as failed. Found by trying to push
this branch to main.
Whitelisting the CI user was the alternative and is declined: it
weakens a protection someone set deliberately and lets a bot push to
main without the checks every human PR has to pass.
So the release page is the changelog. The changelog plugin now writes a
gitignored .release-notes.md, which exists only to carry the notes into
gitea-release.sh without interpolating them into a shell command, and
CHANGELOG.md is a signpost -- a file claiming to be a changelog while
silently never updating is worse than no file.
Tags are not protected, so the tag push is unaffected.
semantic-release resolves the release branch and then pushes a commit
and a tag to it, so a local branch named main is a better starting
point than the --detach the other five workflows use. Still pinned to
the pushed commit rather than to whatever main points at by the time
the container starts.
The floor tag falls back to the PAT when GITEA_TOKEN is unset, which is
safe rather than merely convenient: all four publishers skip v0.0.0
explicitly, so the worst case is four jobs that start and immediately
say there is nothing to build.
CLAUDE.md said .releaserc.yml was a config nothing ran and that there
were five workflows; both stop being true with this branch. The CI
section now names release.yml as the entry point and records the four
things in it that are load-bearing, including the two silent failure
modes worth pinning against.
packaging/homebrew/README.md and docs/android-release.md say where a
user would actually look that upgrading from 1.x needs a reinstall --
Homebrew offers nothing silently, and Android refuses outright.
A release page with nothing to download is one nobody can use. The
Arch package and the APK are already built and merely go unattached;
the plain Linux binary is new, and is what answers 'get the latest
version' without a package manager.
scripts/release-asset.sh waits for the release to exist first.
semantic-release pushes the tag in prepare and creates the release in
publish, so the tag push that starts these workflows happens before
there is an id to upload to -- and a capacity-1 runner serialises that
into working by accident, which is the worst kind of bug.
macOS is absent because it cannot be built here: GOOS=darwin
CGO_ENABLED=0 fails at wails/v3/pkg/mac, the darwin backend being
Objective-C behind cgo. Homebrew builds from source on the user's Mac
and stays the macOS channel. Windows cross-compiles cleanly and is
still withheld: no build of it has ever been run.
All three skip v0.0.0, which is semantic-release's version floor rather
than a shipment.
arch-package.yml ran on push to main and took its version from
`git describe`, so the pacman registry accumulated one package per
merge and not one of them corresponded to a version a user could be
told to install. It builds the tag release.yml cuts instead.
pkgver's literal drops to 0.0.1 with it. That is a downgrade from the
1.x already in the registry, so pacman offers no upgrade and an
existing install has to be removed once; epoch=1 would have avoided
that and is declined in a comment, because an epoch can never be
removed again.
The config has been sitting in .releaserc.yml complete and uninvoked;
this is the workflow that runs it, and the one Gitea-shaped adaptation
it needs.
@semantic-release/github speaks GitHub's API, not Gitea's /api/v1, so
@semantic-release/exec calls scripts/gitea-release.sh instead. That
script reads the notes out of CHANGELOG.md rather than taking them as an
argument: release notes are rendered commit messages, so interpolating
the notes into a shell command would be an injection whose input is the
commit log.
The tag is pushed with a user PAT because Gitea does not start a
workflow from a ref pushed by a workflow's own token, and the three
publishing workflows are keyed on it.
logan
t