Decide the supported sizes, and stop the queue taking the page's width #132

Merged
logan merged 4 commits from feat/24-supported-sizes-queue-model into main 2026-08-19 15:22:40 +00:00
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
logan ede183d026 test(shell): check 900x600, which is narrower than the minimum
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m34s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m42s
The sidebar collapses to icons *below* 900, so the main panel is 843px
at 899 and 700px at 900: the narrowest content area any desktop width
produces is at the top of the Compact band, not at the enforced floor.
A viewport list that stopped at "the minimum" was missing its own worst
case.

MinWidth's comment loses both reasons it used to give, because neither
mechanism can happen any more — the subtitle is display:none from 899
down, and the sidebar host is overflow-y:auto (at 600x460 its
scrollHeight is 434 against a 332px client, and Settings is reachable
after scrolling). The value does not change: 800x600 is where desktop
chrome stops being comfortable, not where the app breaks, and below
600 the phone layout takes over. A floor defended by two expired
mechanisms is a number nobody can argue with, which is worse than
either answer.

Closes #24
2026-08-19 10:54:52 -04:00
logan 481c9dca65 docs: record the size bands and what the queue model cost to find
CLAUDE.md gains the three bands as a promise (Phone <600, Compact
600-899, Desktop >=900, and "no action is ever unreachable at any
supported size"), the computed queue rule and why it cannot be a media
query, and the correction that 900 — not the 800x600 minimum — is the
worst desktop width.

NOTES.md gets the measurements, including two things worth more than
the fix. My first probe for the sidebar's scroller searched
shadowRoot.querySelectorAll('*') and reported "no scroller, items are
unreachable", which reads exactly like a live Settings-unreachable bug;
the scroller is the host, and a host is not inside its own shadow root.
And the plan's first draft claimed the overlay "removes the desktop
half of #69", which the screenshot disproved: open and closed are now
identical at 900x600, so the queue's contribution is gone, but the
header's own overflow remains and is still a live defect.

Refs #24
2026-08-19 10:54:52 -04:00
logan 4025106234 fix(queue): overlay the content instead of taking its width
The panel is flex-shrink: 0 in the flow of .content-area, so an open
queue was paid for by the main panel rather than covering it. Measured
on Playlists: 379px of content left at 900x600 with all three of the
page header's actions clipped, 69px at 390px, and 0px at 320px — where
the content was not degraded but gone.

It goes to an overlay with a scrim when the content cannot spare the
width, and the rule is computed rather than breakpointed:
`available - panelWidth < 480`, where available is .content-area's
width and so already accounts for the sidebar's collapse at 900. A
media query cannot express this, which is the reason for the property:
the panel is drag-resizable between 200 and 500px and persisted, so a
viewport breakpoint silently assumes the default 320 and is wrong by up
to 180px for a user who widened it — in the direction that hurts, since
a wider queue is exactly when the content can least afford it.

480 is a judgement and the comment says so: there is no cliff to derive
it from (the track list rescales continuously, 213px to 124px columns
with no row overflow), so it is anchored to keep the default 1100px
window inline while putting every measured-broken case on the overlay
side.

The overlay is a presentation and not a fork — #55 asks for one
component with two mount points — so the roving tab stop, Alt+Arrow
reorder, drag reorder and selection semantics are untouched. Escape
closes it and returns focus, attached only while the overlay is up: it
is a dismissal rather than a shortcut, which is why it is not a
panel-scoped binding. The scrim covers the content area only, not the
sidebar or the transport, because the queue is not modal.

Refs #24
2026-08-19 10:54:52 -04:00
logan a3134f997f docs(planning): decide the supported sizes and the queue panel's model
#24 asks for a design pass, and #73 hangs the rest of Phase 2 off the
answer, so the decision is written down before any CSS moves.

Measured against the running app, and five things are not in the issue:
the Playlists header clips at 800x600 with the queue *closed* — the
minimum window is the only size this app promises; 900x600 is worse
than 800x600, because the sidebar expands at 900, so the worst desktop
case is not the minimum and every test that stops at the minimum misses
it; at 320px with the queue open the main panel is 0px wide, because
the panel is in the flow rather than over it; only Playlists overflows,
so #69 is one view's action set and not a systemic header failure; and
both reasons in MinWidth's comment describe mechanisms that no longer
exist.

The queue's mode cannot be a media query: its width is drag-resizable
between 200 and 500px and persisted, so a fixed breakpoint assumes the
default 320 and is wrong by 180px in the direction that hurts. It is
computed from the measured widths instead.

#69 stays its own PR on a finding rather than an estimate: page-header
cannot collapse actions that arrive as arbitrary light-DOM markup
through a slot, so the fix needs an actions API across all three hosts.

A very small window becomes the phone layout, which already exists and
is already tested, rather than the mini-player: #12 is a second
always-on-top window, and making it a mode of the main window would
discard navigation state on a resize and put the process-level MPRIS
question on a path a drag can trigger.
2026-08-19 10:54:52 -04:00