fix(e2e): ask the fixture for a track that can navigate

`queue-selection`'s name-click test failed on main on both engines,
having passed in its own PR and in two consecutive local suite runs. I
added it in #152; this is my defect and it had main red.

It staged a queue from the first few rows of `GetTracks(0)` and clicked
a track *name*, which `explore-link` routes to that track's **album**
page. Four tracks in the fixture library have no album — `01 Tone A`,
`02 Tone B`, `Title Only`, `no-tags-at-all` — and a name with nothing
to route to renders as plain text rather than as a link.

Which tracks arrive first is `audio_files.id` order, which is the order
the *scan* inserted them, which depends on concurrency and directory
traversal. Locally the first eight are all from two proper albums; CI
rebuilds its seed with a real scan and got a different eight. The
fixture had a requirement it did not state, so the queue now asks for
tracks that have an album.

A loose locator is what turned that into a mystery rather than a
message. The row was located with `.explore-link` and `first()`, and a
row has two — title and artist. With the title as plain text, `first()`
silently resolved to the *artist* link, so the click went somewhere
real and the assertion was about a destination the test had never
exercised. It names `.track-title .explore-link` now.

Reproduced before fixing, by staging the CI condition deliberately: a
no-album track at row 2 fails the test in 30s on this machine, and the
filtered fixture passes in 752ms.

The Direction's sweep found one other spec slicing `GetTracks` —
`queue-reorder`, which asserts on order alone and needs no property of
the tracks it gets, so it is left as it is.

Closes #156

.planning/NOTES.md

@@ -3891,3 +3891,73 @@ scan takes a minute and is worth running before demoting anybody's links
 — `explore-album-details`'s tracklist (number / title / artist /
 duration) is the one that plausibly *is* mostly link, and is the one
 #5 is about to add selection to.
+
+## A layout is still moving when a guard says it has arrived (measured 2026-08-20)
+
+`album-dropdown.spec.ts` failed with `Expected 80, Received 10` twice
+over two sessions, and #133 already strengthened its guard from
+"scrollable at all" to "has at least the range the assertion needs".
+That was necessary and could not be sufficient, and the reason is
+structural rather than a matter of thresholds: **a guard and the write
+it guards are separate CDP round trips**, so the page is free to
+re-lay-out between them. Polling harder cannot close a window between
+two moments; only removing the window can.
+
+Measured directly, sampling `scrollHeight - clientHeight` on
+`.grid-scroll-container` every frame across a 1440x900 → 900x600 resize,
+three runs:
+
+| t (ms) | range |
+|---|---|
+| 0 | 0 |
+| 1 | **88** |
+| 8–14 | 330 (settled) |
+
+88 satisfies a guard asking for 80 and is not the settled value, so the
+guard can pass while the grid is one layout pass from done. Under
+full-suite load the transient is worse — the observed failure had 10 —
+which is why it shows up on the second run of a suite and not in ten
+consecutive runs of the file alone (0/10 both before and after the fix).
+
+The shape to write instead: **one page-side call that performs the
+action and returns what it observes**, with `expect.poll` retrying
+*that*. `scrollTo()` sets `scrollTop` and returns `scrollTop`, so the
+assertion is about what the grid did rather than about what it was
+ready to do. `layout-overflow.spec.ts`'s sidebar probe already had the
+fused half and was missing the retry; it has both now.
+
+Worth generalising: a spec that resizes and then measures is asserting
+about a moving target for the next dozen frames. Fuse, then poll.
+
+## "The first N tracks" is not a way to ask for an ordinary one (2026-08-20)
+
+`queue-selection.spec.ts` staged its queue from the first few rows of
+`library.Library.GetTracks(0)` and clicked a track *name*, which
+`explore-link` routes to that track's **album** page. Four tracks in the
+fixture library have no album at all — `01 Tone A`, `02 Tone B`,
+`Title Only`, `no-tags-at-all` — and a name with nothing to route to
+renders as **plain text**, not as a link.
+
+Two things follow, and the second is the sharper one.
+
+**The order is the scan's.** `GetTracks` returns `audio_files.id` order,
+i.e. the order the scan inserted rows, which depends on concurrency and
+directory traversal. Locally the first eight are all from two proper
+albums, so the spec passed twice over; CI rebuilds its seed with a real
+scan, got a different eight, and failed on both engines. This is the
+same family as "a seed freezes every default it has already persisted" —
+the fixture library is not a list, it is a *set* with an incidental
+order, and no spec should depend on that order.
+
+**A loose locator hid it.** The row was located with
+`.locator('.explore-link').first()`, and a row has two — the title and
+the artist. When the title is plain text, `first()` silently resolves to
+the **artist** link, so the click went somewhere real and the assertion
+was about a destination the test had not exercised. `.track-title
+.explore-link` is the locator that says which one it means; the loose
+one turned a fixture problem into a mystery.
+
+The general rule for this repo's fixture library: it is deliberately
+full of edge cases (untagged, unicode, duplicates, extremes), so a spec
+that wants an *ordinary* track has to **say so** — filter on the
+property it depends on rather than slicing.

e2e/specs/album-dropdown.spec.ts

@@ -110,27 +110,30 @@ test.describe('the album dropdown', () => {
     await app.setViewportSize({ width: 900, height: 600 });
 
     try {
-      // Wait for the range the assertion below actually needs, not for
+      // The container has to be a scroller at all, which is the thing
-      // "scrollable at all" (#133). The guard used to be
+      // the defect behind this spec broke and is a property rather
-      // `scrollHeight > clientHeight + 40` while the next line asks to
+      // than a moment.
-      // reach 80, so any range in 41-79 satisfied it and could not
-      // satisfy the assertion — and the grid passes through exactly
-      // that while it settles, because it recomputes its columns after
-      // the resize rather than during it. The settled range here is
-      // 330, so this waits rather than weakening anything.
       await expect
         .poll(() => scrollRange(app))
-        .toMatchObject({ room: true, overflowY: 'auto' });
+        .toMatchObject({ overflowY: 'auto' });
 
-      await app.evaluate((target) => {
+      // **Scrolling it and reading it back are one round trip** (#151).
-        const sc = document
+      //
-          .querySelector('cover-grid')
+      // #133 made the guard ask for the range this needs rather than
-          ?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.grid-scroll-container');
+      // for "scrollable at all", which was necessary and is not
-
+      // sufficient: a guard and the write it guards are separate
-        if (sc) sc.scrollTop = target;
+      // `evaluate` calls, so the grid can satisfy the range and settle
-      }, SCROLL_TARGET);
+      // out of it before the write lands. It still does — observed as
-
+      // `Expected 80, Received 10` in the second of three consecutive
-      expect(await scrollTop(app)).toBe(SCROLL_TARGET);
+      // full-suite runs, with the spec green alone on the same app
+      // straight afterwards.
+      //
+      // Polling harder cannot close a window between two moments; only
+      // removing the window can. So the probe sets `scrollTop` and
+      // returns what it reads back, in one page-side call, and the
+      // poll retries *that* — which also means the assertion is about
+      // what the grid did rather than about what it was ready to do.
+      await expect.poll(() => scrollTo(app, SCROLL_TARGET)).toBe(SCROLL_TARGET);
 
       // And the dropdown it opens is on screen, wherever the manager
       // decides that leaves the scroll. It is *not* "the position is
@@ -261,7 +264,7 @@ async function closeDropdown(app: Page): Promise<void> {
   });
 }
 
-/** Whether the grid can scroll at all, which decides if a probe can move. */
+/** Whether the grid is a scroller at all, which is what the bug broke. */
 async function scrollRange(app: Page) {
   return app.evaluate((target) => {
     const sc = document
@@ -269,22 +272,37 @@ async function scrollRange(app: Page) {
       ?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.grid-scroll-container');
 
     return {
-      // `room` is the precondition of the assertion that follows it:
+      // Reported for the failure message rather than waited on: `room`
-      // enough range to actually reach the target. A threshold below
+      // was the guard #133 strengthened, and #151 is that a guard in
-      // what the caller depends on is not a guard.
+      // its own round trip cannot speak for the write in the next one.
+      // `scrollTo` below is the assertion now; this says *why* it did
+      // not reach the target when it does not.
       room: !!sc && sc.scrollHeight - sc.clientHeight >= target,
       overflowY: sc ? getComputedStyle(sc).overflowY : '',
     };
   }, SCROLL_TARGET);
 }
 
-async function scrollTop(app: Page): Promise<number> {
+/**
-  return app.evaluate(
+ * Scroll the grid and report where it actually landed, in one call.
-    () =>
+ *
-      document
+ * The whole point is that the set and the read share a moment: a
-        .querySelector('cover-grid')
+ * `scrollTop` write is clamped to the range *at the instant it lands*,
-        ?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.grid-scroll-container')?.scrollTop ?? -1,
+ * so reading it back in a second round trip asks a container that may
-  );
+ * have re-laid out in between.
+ */
+async function scrollTo(app: Page, target: number): Promise<number> {
+  return app.evaluate((to) => {
+    const sc = document
+      .querySelector('cover-grid')
+      ?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.grid-scroll-container');
+
+    if (!sc) return -1;
+
+    sc.scrollTop = to;
+
+    return sc.scrollTop;
+  }, target);
 }
 
 /** Whether the open dropdown is inside the scroll container's viewport. */

e2e/specs/layout-overflow.spec.ts

@@ -132,22 +132,34 @@ test.describe('the app fits in its own window', () => {
     // be dragged here, but a scaled display or a large system font can
     // still land the layout in it, and clipping the nav with no scroll
     // is the failure that made Settings unreachable.
-    const reachable = await app.locator('app-sidebar').evaluate((el) => {
+    //
-      const settings = el.shadowRoot?.querySelector<HTMLElement>(
+    // The scroll and the measurement share one `evaluate` — #151's
-        '[data-testid="nav-settings"]',
+    // rule, which this already had — and the whole probe is polled,
-      );
+    // which it did not: a viewport change settles asynchronously, so a
+    // single attempt reads whatever the sidebar happened to be doing.
+    // The probe is safe to repeat because scrolling to the bottom twice
+    // is scrolling to the bottom.
+    await expect
+      .poll(() =>
+        app.locator('app-sidebar').evaluate((el) => {
+          const settings = el.shadowRoot?.querySelector<HTMLElement>(
+            '[data-testid="nav-settings"]',
+          );
 
-      if (!settings) return null;
+          if (!settings) return null;
 
-      el.scrollTop = el.scrollHeight;
+          el.scrollTop = el.scrollHeight;
 
-      const item = settings.getBoundingClientRect();
+          const item = settings.getBoundingClientRect();
-      const pane = el.getBoundingClientRect();
+          const pane = el.getBoundingClientRect();
 
-      return item.bottom <= Math.ceil(pane.bottom) && item.top >= Math.floor(pane.top);
+          return (
-    });
+            item.bottom <= Math.ceil(pane.bottom) &&
-
+            item.top >= Math.floor(pane.top)
-    expect(reachable).toBe(true);
+          );
+        }),
+      )
+      .toBe(true);
   });
 });
 

e2e/specs/queue-selection.spec.ts

@@ -93,10 +93,31 @@ async function queueSixAndOpen(app: Page): Promise<void> {
       'library.Library.GetTracks',
       [0],
       10_000,
-    )) as { FilePath: string; TrackName: string }[];
+    )) as { FilePath: string; TrackName: string; Album: string }[];
 
     const long = tracks.find((t) => t.TrackName === longTitle);
-    const rest = tracks.filter((t) => t.TrackName !== longTitle).slice(0, 5);
+
+    /**
+     * **Tracks that have an album**, which is a requirement of one of
+     * the tests and was previously left to luck (#156).
+     *
+     * `explore-link` routes a track name to its *album's* page, so a
+     * track with no album renders a name that navigates nowhere — and
+     * the fixture library deliberately contains two (`01 Tone A`,
+     * `02 Tone B`). Which tracks arrive first is `audio_files.id`
+     * order, i.e. the order the **scan** inserted them, which depends
+     * on concurrency and directory traversal: locally the first eight
+     * all had albums and the spec passed twice over, and CI rebuilds
+     * its seed with a real scan and got a different eight.
+     *
+     * Asking for what the test needs is the fix. It is not a
+     * narrowing: every assertion here wants an ordinary track, and
+     * "the first five rows" was never a way to ask for one in a
+     * library whose whole purpose is edge cases.
+     */
+    const rest = tracks
+      .filter((t) => t.TrackName !== longTitle && t.Album !== '')
+      .slice(0, 5);
 
     // Index 3 is the long one: far enough down that a shift-extend has
     // room either side of it.
@@ -223,7 +244,14 @@ test.describe('selecting in the queue with a mouse', () => {
       .poll(() => selected(app), { timeout: HIGHLIGHT_MS })
       .toEqual([1]);
 
-    await row(app, 2).locator('.explore-link').first().click();
+    // `.track-title .explore-link`, not `.explore-link` first(): a row
+    // has two, and which one `first()` finds depends on whether the
+    // *title* is a link at all. It is not, for a track with no album —
+    // `explore-link` renders plain text where it cannot route — so the
+    // loose locator silently clicked the **artist** instead and the
+    // assertion below was about a different destination than the one
+    // being exercised (#156).
+    await row(app, 2).locator('.track-title .explore-link').click();
 
     await expect(app.getByTestId('main-content')).toHaveAttribute(
       'data-active-view',