Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
logan 52d095e3c6 feat(android): the phone's "More" is a bottom sheet
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m47s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 10m14s
The tab bar's fifth item opened `<app-sidebar>` in a `wa-drawer`
sliding in from the side, which is a desktop shape put on a phone: a
200px column of a 424px screen, opening away from the thumb that asked
for it, with the rest of its 400px band empty. It also had three nested
scrollers in it -- the dialog, its body, and the sidebar's own
`overflow-y: auto` host -- so which box a drag moved depended on where
the finger landed, which is the "only part of the screen scrolls under
my finger" in the report.

It is the same element with `placement="bottom"` and `without-header`,
so the surface is the sheet #60 already built rather than a second
pattern: a `wa-drawer` is a native `<dialog>` opened with `showModal()`,
which is exactly the top layer that finding rests on, so the focus
trap, Escape, tap-outside and `wa-after-hide` come along unchanged and
nothing new has to be proved about paint containment.

The sidebar is still mounted rather than re-listed as data, because the
shell's own copy is `display: none` below 600px rather than removed --
a second list drawing `nav-*` handles is the duplicate-testid failure
this component already renders conditionally to avoid. What `expanded`
means had to grow to say the host owns the *box*: `app-sidebar` writes
an inline width and caps itself at 400px, which beats any rule the host
could write, so the width, the scrolling and the mouse-only resize
handle now follow that attribute. The rows are 48px below 600px, stated
in the sidebar's own stylesheet since that is the only place it renders
there.

Measured in the running app at 424x439: the sheet is 424 wide, 373 tall
(85vh, so there is an outside to tap), rows 48px, one scroller with
`overscroll-behavior: contain`, and Settings' row reachable at the end
of it. Desktop and Compact are untouched.

Closes #71
2026-08-25 13:48:51 -04:00
logan 939915b1fa Merge pull request 'feat(android): the tap highlight goes, a press state replaces it' (#214) from feat/54-native-touch-feel into main
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m58s
CI / e2e (push) Canceled after 0s
2026-08-25 17:48:45 +00:00
5 changed files with 335 additions and 23 deletions
+31 -4
View File
@@ -1113,9 +1113,9 @@ not the fix and cannot be: that function is the `document` listener for
`navigate`, so it is an infinite loop.
**It is a store rather than an event, because a component that mounts
after a navigation still has to know.** `bottom-nav`'s "More" drawer
after a navigation still has to know.** `bottom-nav`'s "More" sheet
creates its `<app-sidebar>` on open, and that copy had heard no
`navigate` at all — standing on Albums, the drawer opened highlighting
`navigate` at all — standing on Albums, it opened highlighting
Home. An event has no answer for a listener that was not there.
**A detail view is not a view here**, so the destination it was opened
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ and then vanishing.
than a general rule about phones.** `PHONE_COLUMN_IDS` is the precedent
for "what a phone shows is a different question", and it would apply —
except that `bottom-nav`'s "More" opens the *same* `<app-sidebar>`,
which filters, so an unfiltered bar would contradict its own drawer one
which filters, so an unfiltered bar would contradict its own sheet one
tap away. Which four tabs is still plan 016's committed subset; this
only removes from it, and "More" is never filtered because it is how
everything else stays reachable.
@@ -1874,7 +1874,7 @@ listing the destinations again — but rendering it unconditionally put a
second copy of every `data-testid="nav-*"` in the DOM, and 30 existing
specs failed with "strict mode violation: resolved to 2 elements" on a
desktop viewport where the element is not even visible. It renders only
while the drawer is open, and `bottom-nav.test.ts` asserts its absence
while the sheet is open, and `bottom-nav.test.ts` asserts its absence
before that.
**The tab bar is four destinations and a way to the rest.** Three to
@@ -1883,6 +1883,33 @@ is 32px each. Which four is plan 016's committed subset, and everything
else — Settings included, because a phone still needs it — is behind
"More".
**And "More" rises from the bottom, on #60's sheet rather than a
second one** (#71). It was a `wa-drawer placement="start"`: a 200px
column of a 424px screen, opening away from the thumb that asked for
it, with the rest of its 400px band empty. It is the *same element*
with `placement="bottom"` and `without-header`, which is what keeps
the change to where it comes from — `wa-drawer` renders a native
`<dialog>` and opens it with `showModal()`, so #60's containment
finding carries over with nothing new to prove, and the focus trap,
Escape, tap-outside and `wa-after-hide` all come along. Measured at
424x439: 424 wide, 373 tall (85vh, so there is an outside to tap),
48px rows.
Three things about it are load-bearing. **The sidebar is mounted
rather than re-listed as data**, which the issue offers as the
alternative: the shell's own `<app-sidebar>` is `display: none` below
600px rather than removed, so a second list drawing `nav-*` handles is
the duplication above, and it would be a second place to add the next
view to. **There is one scroller, and it is the sheet's body** — the
reported "only part of the screen scrolls under my finger" is three
nested ones (the dialog, its body, and the sidebar's own
`overflow-y: auto` host), so which box a drag moves depends on where
the finger landed; `overscroll-behavior: contain` is the other half.
And **`expanded` means the host owns the box, not just the labels**:
`app-sidebar` writes an *inline* width and caps itself at 400px, which
beats any rule the host could write, so the width, the scrolling and
the mouse-only resize handle all follow that attribute.
**There are three supported size bands, and the queue is part of the
promise.** Plan 018 (#24) wrote them down: **Phone** below 600 (bottom
nav, reflows, fits 320px exactly), **Compact** 600899 (icon sidebar),
+52
View File
@@ -98,6 +98,58 @@ test.describe('the shell on a phone', () => {
).toBeVisible();
});
test('draws "More" as a sheet on the bottom edge (#71)', async ({ app }) => {
await app.getByTestId('tab-more').click();
await expect(app.getByTestId('nav-drawer').locator('app-sidebar'))
.toBeVisible();
// What the report is about is geometry, and geometry is what no
// other assertion here can see: the side drawer was a 200px column
// opening away from the thumb that asked for it, with the rest of
// its 400px band empty. Measured rather than screenshotted, since
// the failure is a number.
//
// Polled, because a sheet *arrives*: the drawer's show animation
// translates it a full height below the fold, so a measurement
// taken the moment its content is visible reports a box hanging
// 412px off the bottom of the screen. Asking for the settled
// number is the assertion; asking once is a race.
const measure = () => app.evaluate(() => {
const nav = document.querySelector('bottom-nav');
const drawer = nav?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('wa-drawer');
const dialog = drawer?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('[part~="dialog"]');
const sidebar = nav?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('app-sidebar');
const row = sidebar?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('li button');
const box = dialog?.getBoundingClientRect();
return {
left: Math.round(box?.left ?? -1),
right: Math.round(box?.right ?? -1),
bottom: Math.round(box?.bottom ?? -1),
height: Math.round(box?.height ?? -1),
row: Math.round(row?.getBoundingClientRect().height ?? -1),
viewport: [window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight],
};
});
await expect
.poll(async () => (await measure()).bottom)
.toBe(PHONE.height);
const sheet = await measure();
expect(sheet.left).toBe(0);
expect(sheet.right).toBe(sheet.viewport[0]);
// A surface covering the whole screen is a page, not a sheet --
// which is also what leaves an outside to tap on, the only pointer
// route out of it (#171 is the same question one surface over).
expect(sheet.height).toBeLessThan(sheet.viewport[1]);
// 48px rows, from #186's touch floor and #60's context sheet.
expect(sheet.row).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(48);
});
for (const vp of [PHONE, SMALL_PHONE]) {
test(`does not scroll sideways at ${vp.width}×${vp.height}`, async ({ app }) => {
await app.setViewportSize(vp);
@@ -27,15 +27,43 @@ interface Tab {
* three to five items before the targets stop being thumb-sized —
* 360 px over eleven sidebar entries is 32 px each — so the four here
* are the ones plan 016's subset says a phone is *for*, and "More"
* opens the existing `<app-sidebar>` in a drawer. That is deliberately
* opens the existing `<app-sidebar>` in a sheet. That is deliberately
* a reuse rather than a second nav: two lists of destinations is two
* places to add the next view to, and the sidebar already carries the
* drag-to-navigate behaviour, the active state and the labels.
*
* **"More" rises from the bottom, and it is the same sheet a context
* menu is** (#71). It was a `wa-drawer` sliding in from the side: a
* 200px column of a 424px screen, opening away from the thumb that
* asked for it, with three nested scrollers in it — the dialog, its
* body, and the sidebar's own `overflow-y: auto` host — which is the
* "only part of the screen scrolls under my finger" in the report.
*
* Three things about the replacement are load-bearing.
*
* **It is the same element with another `placement`, not a new
* surface.** `wa-drawer` renders a native `<dialog>` and opens it with
* `showModal()`, which is exactly what `menu-surface`'s sheet relies
* on — Chrome 37, the real top layer — so #60's containment finding
* carries over with nothing new to prove, and the focus trap, Escape,
* tap-outside and `wa-after-hide` all come along unchanged.
*
* **The body is the only scroller**, with `overscroll-behavior:
* contain`, and the sidebar is told to stop being one. Nesting them is
* what makes a drag scroll the wrong box.
*
* **The sidebar is still mounted rather than re-listed as data**,
* which the issue offers as an alternative. Its `data-testid` per
* destination is the reason: the shell's own sidebar is `display:
* none` below 600px rather than removed, so a second list drawing
* `nav-*` handles is the duplication this component already renders
* conditionally to avoid — and it would be a second place to add the
* next view to, with its own copy of #25's visibility filter.
*
* It emits the same bubbling, composed `navigate` event the sidebar
* does, so `index.ts` needs no knowledge of it, and it listens for that
* event globally for the same reason the sidebar does: a navigation it
* did not send (a card click, a detail view, the drawer) still has to
* did not send (a card click, a detail view, the sheet) still has to
* move the highlight.
*/
@customElement('bottom-nav')
@@ -115,15 +143,50 @@ export class BottomNav extends LitElement {
white-space: nowrap;
}
wa-drawer::part(body) {
padding: 0;
/* The sheet. --size is the drawer's own API for the axis its
placement uses, so auto is what makes it hug its content
instead of being a fixed 25rem band; the rest is the shape
the menu-surface context sheet already has, so a phone meets
one sheet rather than two. 85vh for its reason too: a surface
covering the whole screen is a page, not a sheet. */
wa-drawer {
--size: auto;
}
app-sidebar {
/* The sidebar sizes itself inline and collapses to icons
below 900px, which is every phone. In the drawer there
is room for the labels, so it is told not to. */
height: 100%;
wa-drawer::part(dialog) {
max-height: 85vh;
border-radius: 12px 12px 0 0;
/* The sidebar paints its own surface, so the sheet takes
that colour rather than the menus' elevated one: two
greys in one sheet is a seam across the middle of it. */
background-color: var(--yj-bg-surface, #212529);
/* One scroller, and it is the body below. The dialog's own
overflow: auto is what let the sheet scroll as well as
its content, and it is also what would square off the
corners this rule just rounded. */
overflow: hidden;
}
wa-drawer::part(body) {
padding: 0;
/* A scroll that reaches the end of this list must not
become a scroll of the page underneath it. */
overscroll-behavior: contain;
/* The sheet sits on the bottom edge, so the last
destination would otherwise be under the home indicator
on a gesture-navigation phone -- the same allowance the
bar itself makes above. */
padding-bottom: env(safe-area-inset-bottom, 0);
}
/* A sheet is dragged at with a thumb, so it says where its top
edge is. Decorative: the destinations are below it. */
.grip {
width: 36px;
height: 4px;
margin: 8px auto 4px;
border-radius: 2px;
background: var(--yj-text-tertiary, #888);
}
`];
@@ -158,7 +221,7 @@ export class BottomNav extends LitElement {
private visibilityCtrl = new ViewVisibilityController(this);
/**
* Whether the drawer has been asked for.
* Whether the sheet has been asked for.
*
* The sidebar inside it is rendered only while this is true, and
* that is not an optimisation. `app-sidebar` carries a
@@ -200,15 +263,17 @@ export class BottomNav extends LitElement {
override updated() {
// Web Awesome renders its heading into its own shadow root and
// never points aria-labelledby at it, so the drawer would
// never points aria-labelledby at it, so the sheet would
// otherwise be announced unnamed -- the same fix, and the same
// reason, as every wa-dialog in the app. A drawer's shadow root
// has the same shape, so the helper needs no change.
// has the same shape, so the helper needs no change; under
// `without-header` there is no heading to point at, which is
// that helper's documented `aria-label` path.
nameDialog(this.drawer);
}
private onGlobalNavigate = () => {
// A navigation from inside the drawer is the drawer's job done.
// A navigation from inside the sheet is the sheet's job done.
// The highlight is not this listener's business any more.
this.drawerOpen = false;
};
@@ -274,12 +339,14 @@ export class BottomNav extends LitElement {
</nav>
<wa-drawer
placement="start"
placement="bottom"
without-header
label="All views"
data-testid="nav-drawer"
?open=${this.drawerOpen}
@wa-after-hide=${this.onDrawerHide}
>
<div class="grip"></div>
${this.drawerOpen
? html`<app-sidebar expanded></app-sidebar>`
: nothing}
+56 -5
View File
@@ -42,6 +42,26 @@ export class AppSidebar extends LitElement {
scrollbar-width: thin;
}
/* A host that has made room owns the box, not just the labels
(#71). The bottom-nav sheet is the width of the screen and
provides the one scroll container it needs; left to itself
the sidebar is a 200px column with a second scroller inside
it, which is what a nested scroll region feels like under a
thumb -- part of the surface moves and part of it does not. */
:host([expanded]) {
max-width: none;
height: auto;
overflow: visible;
}
/* And the width is not draggable there. It is a mouse
affordance (mousedown, col-resize) sitting on the right edge
of a touch surface, where the compatibility mouse events a
tap synthesises can start a resize nobody asked for. */
:host([expanded]) .resize-handle {
display: none;
}
.resize-handle {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
@@ -160,6 +180,25 @@ export class AppSidebar extends LitElement {
:host(.collapsed) li button wa-icon {
font-size: var(--yj-icon-md);
}
/* Below 600px the only place this renders is the bottom-nav
sheet -- the shell's own copy is display: none there -- so
the rows are sized for the thumb that opened it: 48px, which
is #186's floor and the height every row in #60's context
sheet already has. A media query inside a shadow root is
answered by the viewport, so the component states this
itself rather than the sheet reaching in. */
@media (max-width: 599px) {
ul {
padding: 4px 8px 8px;
}
li button {
min-height: 48px;
padding: 12px 10px;
gap: 14px;
}
}
`];
/** Delay in ms before a drag-hover triggers navigation. */
@@ -188,11 +227,14 @@ export class AppSidebar extends LitElement {
/**
* Keep the labels regardless of the viewport, for a host that has
* made room for them -- `bottom-nav`'s drawer, which is the whole
* made room for them -- `bottom-nav`'s sheet, which is the whole
* screen wide on the phone where this would otherwise auto-collapse
* to icons. The auto-collapse is a *width* response to a narrow
* shell, and inside a drawer the shell is not what the sidebar is
* shell, and inside a sheet the shell is not what the sidebar is
* sharing space with.
*
* It says the host owns the *box*, not only the labels: the width,
* the scrolling and the resize handle all follow it (#71).
*/
@property({ type: Boolean, reflect: true })
expanded = false;
@@ -365,9 +407,18 @@ export class AppSidebar extends LitElement {
* be a media query in the stylesheet.
*/
private applyViewportWidth() {
const narrow =
!this.expanded &&
(this.narrowViewport?.matches ?? false);
// A host that made room decides how much: `bottom-nav`'s sheet
// is the whole screen wide, and the inline width below -- which
// beats any rule the host could write -- would draw the old
// 200px side drawer inside it.
if (this.expanded) {
this.style.width = '100%';
this.collapsed = false;
return;
}
const narrow = this.narrowViewport?.matches ?? false;
const width = narrow
? MIN_WIDTH
: this.userWidth;
+115
View File
@@ -193,4 +193,119 @@ describe('bottom-nav', () => {
expect(shadow<HTMLElement>(el, 'app-sidebar')?.hasAttribute('expanded'))
.toBe(true);
});
it('draws "More" as a sheet rising from the bottom', async () => {
const el = await fixture<Nav>('bottom-nav');
const drawer = shadow<HTMLElement>(el, 'wa-drawer');
// #71. A side drawer is a desktop shape: it opened away from the
// thumb that asked for it and drew a 200px column of a 424px
// screen. `placement` is the whole of the change to *where* it
// comes from, and `without-header` is what makes it the same sheet
// `menu-surface` draws rather than a second pattern with a title
// bar and a close button.
expect(drawer?.getAttribute('placement')).toBe('bottom');
expect(drawer?.hasAttribute('without-header')).toBe(true);
// Named all the same: `nameDialog`'s documented aria-label path,
// since without-header renders no heading to point at.
expect(drawer?.getAttribute('label')).toBe('All views');
});
it('leaves exactly one scroll container, and it is the sheet body', async () => {
const el = await fixture<Nav>('bottom-nav');
const drawer = shadow<HTMLElement & { open: boolean }>(el, 'wa-drawer');
if (!drawer) throw new Error('no drawer');
const shown = once(drawer, 'wa-after-show');
shadow<HTMLButtonElement>(el, '[data-testid="tab-more"]')?.click();
await shown;
await update(el, {});
// The report is "only part of the screen scrolls under my finger",
// and the cause is three boxes that each scroll: the dialog, its
// body, and the sidebar's own overflow-y host. Which one a drag
// moves depends on where the finger landed.
const dialog = drawer.shadowRoot?.querySelector('[part~="dialog"]');
const body = drawer.shadowRoot?.querySelector('[part~="body"]');
const sidebar = shadow<HTMLElement>(el, 'app-sidebar');
if (!dialog || !body || !sidebar) throw new Error('no sheet');
expect(getComputedStyle(dialog).overflowY).toBe('hidden');
expect(getComputedStyle(body).overflowY).toBe('auto');
expect(getComputedStyle(sidebar).overflowY).toBe('visible');
// And the one that does scroll keeps it to itself, or reaching the
// end of the destinations scrolls the page behind the sheet.
expect(getComputedStyle(body).overscrollBehaviorY).toBe('contain');
});
it('gives the sheet the whole width, which the sidebar does not take', async () => {
const el = await fixture<Nav>('bottom-nav');
shadow<HTMLButtonElement>(el, '[data-testid="tab-more"]')?.click();
await update(el, {});
const sidebar = shadow<HTMLElement>(el, 'app-sidebar');
if (!sidebar) throw new Error('no sidebar');
// `app-sidebar` writes an *inline* width and caps itself at 400px,
// which beats any rule this host could write — so "the host owns
// the box" has to be part of what `expanded` means, or the sheet
// draws the old 200px column inside a full-width surface.
expect(sidebar.style.width).toBe('100%');
expect(getComputedStyle(sidebar).maxWidth).toBe('none');
});
it('sizes the sheet rows for a thumb, below the phone breakpoint', async () => {
const el = await fixture<Nav>('bottom-nav');
shadow<HTMLButtonElement>(el, '[data-testid="tab-more"]')?.click();
await update(el, {});
const sidebar = shadow<HTMLElement>(el, 'app-sidebar');
const sheets = sidebar?.shadowRoot?.adoptedStyleSheets ?? [];
const phoneRules: string[] = [];
for (const sheet of sheets) {
for (const rule of Array.from(sheet.cssRules)) {
if (!(rule instanceof CSSMediaRule)) continue;
if (!/max-width:\s*599px/.test(rule.conditionText)) continue;
for (const inner of Array.from(rule.cssRules)) {
phoneRules.push(inner.cssText);
}
}
}
// Asserted against the parsed stylesheet, like
// `hover-affordance.test.ts` and for the same reason: this tier's
// iframe is not 599px wide, so the rule cannot be *rendered* here —
// but the regression worth catching is someone moving it out of the
// query, which nothing on a desktop draws differently.
expect(phoneRules.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
expect(phoneRules.some((r) => /min-height:\s*48px/.test(r))).toBe(true);
});
it('takes the resize handle out of the sheet', async () => {
const el = await fixture<Nav>('bottom-nav');
shadow<HTMLButtonElement>(el, '[data-testid="tab-more"]')?.click();
await update(el, {});
const handle = shadow<HTMLElement>(el, 'app-sidebar')
?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.resize-handle');
if (!handle) throw new Error('no resize handle');
// A col-resize strip on the right edge of a touch surface: the
// compatibility mouse events a tap synthesises reach its
// `mousedown`, so it can start a resize nobody asked for.
expect(getComputedStyle(handle).display).toBe('none');
});
});