docs: a CI-only change is ci:, not fix(ci):

The commit-analyzer reads the type and ignores the scope, so `fix` is a
patch whatever sits in the brackets. Two commits touching nothing but
.gitea/workflows/unclaim.yml were written `fix(ci):` and cut v0.2.1 and
v0.2.2 -- real releases, published to Arch, Homebrew and the APK
registry, containing no user-facing change.

CLAUDE.md already warned that a mistyped feat ships a minor version.
That was not enough, because this was not a mistyped type: `fix` was
chosen deliberately, in the belief that the (ci) scope qualified it.

The version bump is the small half, which is why this gets a paragraph
rather than a clause. A merge to main starts two workflows; if
release.yml then pushes a tag, that tag push starts four more --
arch-package, homebrew-formula, android-apk and desktop-assets -- on a
runner with capacity 1, where the APK build alone is tens of minutes
and publishes a signed artifact to a public registry. So a mistyped
type is six workflow runs, not an odd-looking changelog.

`make release-dry` answers this before the merge instead of after, and
is cheaper than any one of those runs.

The two releases are staying: they are already published, and a version
that vanishes is worse for whoever pulled it than one that turns out to
be empty.

Closes #111

.gitea/workflows/unclaim.yml

@@ -42,6 +42,13 @@ jobs:
 
     steps:
       - name: Drop the claim label
+        # **Inside a container the act runner selects `sh`, not bash**, so
+        # `set -o pipefail` fails the job on its second line with "Illegal
+        # option" and the step never reaches the API.  `homebrew-formula.yml`
+        # carries the same `set -euo pipefail` without trouble because it
+        # runs with **no container**, on the host image where bash is the
+        # default — so "another workflow does it" is not evidence here.
+        shell: bash
         env:
           # The automatic Actions token, as release.yml uses for the
           # floor tag.  It needs no more than write access to this repo.
@@ -51,8 +58,15 @@ jobs:
         run: |
           set -euo pipefail
 
+          # `ca-certificates` is named because `--no-install-recommends`
+          # skips it, and `ubuntu:24.04` ships no CA bundle of its own —
+          # so curl comes up unable to verify TLS against our own Gitea
+          # and fails with "error setting certificate file" (exit 77).
+          # Every other containerised workflow here spells it out for the
+          # same reason; this one did not, and cost a release cycle.
           apt-get update -qq
-          apt-get install -y -qq --no-install-recommends curl jq >/dev/null
+          apt-get install -y -qq --no-install-recommends \
+            ca-certificates curl jq >/dev/null
 
           label_id=$(
             curl -sSf -H "Authorization: token $TOKEN" "$API/labels?limit=100" |
@@ -71,8 +85,14 @@ jobs:
           # label answers the same as one that did, which is what makes
           # this safe to run on *every* close rather than only the ones
           # that were claimed.
+          # The body is captured, not discarded, so a refusal is
+          # diagnosable from this log alone.  Whether the automatic
+          # token carries issue-write scope is still unproven, and
+          # "DELETE returned 403" without Gitea's own sentence costs
+          # another merge to find out which of the two it is.
+          body=$(mktemp)
           code=$(
-            curl -sS -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' -X DELETE \
+            curl -sS -o "$body" -w '%{http_code}' -X DELETE \
               -H "Authorization: token $TOKEN" \
               "$API/issues/$ISSUE/labels/$label_id"
           )
@@ -81,6 +101,7 @@ jobs:
             204) echo "unclaim: #$ISSUE is closed and unclaimed" ;;
             *)
               echo "unclaim: DELETE returned $code for #$ISSUE" >&2
+              cat "$body" >&2
               exit 1
               ;;
           esac

CLAUDE.md

@@ -2138,6 +2138,23 @@ Pre-commit hooks verify generated code is fresh — always run `make generate` a
   mistyped `feat` ships a minor version. `make release-dry` answers "what
   would this merge release" without pushing.
 
+  **The analyzer reads the type and ignores the scope, so a CI-only change
+  is `ci:` and never `fix(ci):`.** The scope is decoration; `fix` is a
+  patch whatever is in the brackets. Two commits touching nothing but
+  `.gitea/workflows/unclaim.yml` were written `fix(ci):` and cut `v0.2.1`
+  and `v0.2.2` — real releases, published to Arch, Homebrew and the APK
+  registry, containing no user-facing change. They were left in place
+  rather than deleted, because a version that vanishes is worse for
+  whoever pulled it than one that turns out to be empty.
+
+  **The blast radius is bigger than the version number**, which is what
+  makes this worth a paragraph. A merge to `main` starts two workflows;
+  if `release.yml` then pushes a tag, that tag push starts **four more**
+  (`arch-package`, `homebrew-formula`, `android-apk`, `desktop-assets`) —
+  on a runner with capacity 1, where the APK build alone is tens of
+  minutes. `make release-dry` before merging is how you find out, and it
+  is cheaper than every one of those.
+
   **`@semantic-release/github` is not in that config and must not be.**
   Gitea's API is `/api/v1` and is not GitHub's surface, so
   `@semantic-release/exec` calls `scripts/gitea-release.sh` instead — one