fix(scripts): let issue.sh claim work on a write:issue-only token

`claim` is the one step the workflow requires before the first edit, and
it failed outright on a token scoped to the work it does: `me()` calls
`GET /user` purely to name the assignee, and that endpoint needs
read:user. So the documented process was blocked by its own tooling, and
the fallback was to do the assignment, the label and the comment by hand
— which is the half-made claim `claim` exists to prevent.

GITEA_USER short-circuits the lookup, so least privilege is enough. The
lookup stays as the fallback because it is right when the scope is there
and needs no setup. Failure is now actionable and says both remedies,
and it still happens before any of the three halves are mutated.

Closes #130

CLAUDE.md

@@ -2369,6 +2369,23 @@ Pre-commit hooks verify generated code is fresh — always run `make generate` a
   mistyped `feat` ships a minor version. `make release-dry` answers "what
   would this merge release" without pushing.
 
+  **The analyzer reads the type and ignores the scope, so a CI-only change
+  is `ci:` and never `fix(ci):`.** The scope is decoration; `fix` is a
+  patch whatever is in the brackets. Two commits touching nothing but
+  `.gitea/workflows/unclaim.yml` were written `fix(ci):` and cut `v0.2.1`
+  and `v0.2.2` — real releases, published to Arch, Homebrew and the APK
+  registry, containing no user-facing change. They were left in place
+  rather than deleted, because a version that vanishes is worse for
+  whoever pulled it than one that turns out to be empty.
+
+  **The blast radius is bigger than the version number**, which is what
+  makes this worth a paragraph. A merge to `main` starts two workflows;
+  if `release.yml` then pushes a tag, that tag push starts **four more**
+  (`arch-package`, `homebrew-formula`, `android-apk`, `desktop-assets`) —
+  on a runner with capacity 1, where the APK build alone is tens of
+  minutes. `make release-dry` before merging is how you find out, and it
+  is cheaper than every one of those.
+
   **`@semantic-release/github` is not in that config and must not be.**
   Gitea's API is `/api/v1` and is not GitHub's surface, so
   `@semantic-release/exec` calls `scripts/gitea-release.sh` instead — one

e2e/specs/album-dropdown.spec.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
 import { test, expect } from '../support/fixtures.js';
 import type { Page } from '@playwright/test';
 
+/**
+ * How far the scroll test scrolls. One constant, because the guard and
+ * the assertion have to agree about it — they did not, which is #133.
+ */
+const SCROLL_TARGET = 80;
+
 /**
  * Plan 007 phase 5: expanding an album shows its tracks.
  *
@@ -104,20 +110,27 @@ test.describe('the album dropdown', () => {
     await app.setViewportSize({ width: 900, height: 600 });
 
     try {
-      await expect.poll(() => scrollRange(app)).toMatchObject({
-        scrollable: true,
-        overflowY: 'auto',
-      });
+      // Wait for the range the assertion below actually needs, not for
+      // "scrollable at all" (#133). The guard used to be
+      // `scrollHeight > clientHeight + 40` while the next line asks to
+      // reach 80, so any range in 41-79 satisfied it and could not
+      // satisfy the assertion — and the grid passes through exactly
+      // that while it settles, because it recomputes its columns after
+      // the resize rather than during it. The settled range here is
+      // 330, so this waits rather than weakening anything.
+      await expect
+        .poll(() => scrollRange(app))
+        .toMatchObject({ room: true, overflowY: 'auto' });
 
-      await app.evaluate(() => {
+      await app.evaluate((target) => {
         const sc = document
           .querySelector('cover-grid')
           ?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.grid-scroll-container');
 
-        if (sc) sc.scrollTop = 80;
-      });
+        if (sc) sc.scrollTop = target;
+      }, SCROLL_TARGET);
 
-      expect(await scrollTop(app)).toBe(80);
+      expect(await scrollTop(app)).toBe(SCROLL_TARGET);
 
       // And the dropdown it opens is on screen, wherever the manager
       // decides that leaves the scroll. It is *not* "the position is
@@ -250,16 +263,19 @@ async function closeDropdown(app: Page): Promise<void> {
 
 /** Whether the grid can scroll at all, which decides if a probe can move. */
 async function scrollRange(app: Page) {
-  return app.evaluate(() => {
+  return app.evaluate((target) => {
     const sc = document
       .querySelector('cover-grid')
       ?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.grid-scroll-container');
 
     return {
-      scrollable: !!sc && sc.scrollHeight > sc.clientHeight + 40,
+      // `room` is the precondition of the assertion that follows it:
+      // enough range to actually reach the target. A threshold below
+      // what the caller depends on is not a guard.
+      room: !!sc && sc.scrollHeight - sc.clientHeight >= target,
       overflowY: sc ? getComputedStyle(sc).overflowY : '',
     };
-  });
+  }, SCROLL_TARGET);
 }
 
 async function scrollTop(app: Page): Promise<number> {

scripts/issue.sh

@@ -38,8 +38,10 @@
 # Where a body is taken and no --body-file is given, it is read from stdin.
 #
 # Environment:
-#   GITEA_TOKEN   a PAT with write:issue (plus write:repository and read:user,
-#                 which the rest of this repo's tooling reaches for)
+#   GITEA_TOKEN   a PAT with write:issue.  `claim` and `mine` additionally
+#                 need to know your username: set GITEA_USER, or give the
+#                 token read:user and it is looked up.
+#   GITEA_USER    your Gitea login.  Optional; see above.
 #   GITEA_URL     defaults to https://git.ljones.me
 #   GITEA_REPO    defaults to yonlu/yellowjacket
 set -euo pipefail
@@ -81,7 +83,29 @@ read_body() {
 	if [ "$file" = "-" ]; then cat; else cat "$file"; fi
 }
 
-me() { curl -sS -H "Authorization: token $GITEA_TOKEN" "$server/api/v1/user" | python3 "$py" login; }
+# The one lookup in this script that needs a scope beyond write:issue.
+# `GET /user` requires read:user, and it is reached for exactly two reasons:
+# to name the assignee in `claim`, and to filter in `mine`.  A token scoped to
+# the work this script does — write:issue — therefore failed at `claim`, which
+# is the one step the workflow requires before the first edit, so the whole
+# documented process was blocked by its own tooling.
+#
+# GITEA_USER short-circuits it, which is what lets a least-privilege token do
+# the job.  The lookup stays as the fallback because it is right when the
+# scope is there and needs no setup at all.
+me() {
+	if [ -n "${GITEA_USER:-}" ]; then
+		printf '%s' "$GITEA_USER"
+		return
+	fi
+	curl -sS -H "Authorization: token $GITEA_TOKEN" "$server/api/v1/user" |
+		python3 "$py" login ||
+		{
+			echo "issue.sh: could not resolve your username. Set GITEA_USER, or" >&2
+			echo "issue.sh: re-issue GITEA_TOKEN with read:user." >&2
+			exit 1
+		}
+}
 
 label_id() { call GET "/labels?limit=100" | python3 "$py" label-id "$1"; }