docs: a CI-only change is ci:, not fix(ci):

The commit-analyzer reads the type and ignores the scope, so `fix` is a
patch whatever sits in the brackets. Two commits touching nothing but
.gitea/workflows/unclaim.yml were written `fix(ci):` and cut v0.2.1 and
v0.2.2 -- real releases, published to Arch, Homebrew and the APK
registry, containing no user-facing change.

CLAUDE.md already warned that a mistyped feat ships a minor version.
That was not enough, because this was not a mistyped type: `fix` was
chosen deliberately, in the belief that the (ci) scope qualified it.

The version bump is the small half, which is why this gets a paragraph
rather than a clause. A merge to main starts two workflows; if
release.yml then pushes a tag, that tag push starts four more --
arch-package, homebrew-formula, android-apk and desktop-assets -- on a
runner with capacity 1, where the APK build alone is tens of minutes
and publishes a signed artifact to a public registry. So a mistyped
type is six workflow runs, not an odd-looking changelog.

`make release-dry` answers this before the merge instead of after, and
is cheaper than any one of those runs.

The two releases are staying: they are already published, and a version
that vanishes is worse for whoever pulled it than one that turns out to
be empty.

Closes #111

CLAUDE.md

@@ -2369,6 +2369,23 @@ Pre-commit hooks verify generated code is fresh — always run `make generate` a
   mistyped `feat` ships a minor version. `make release-dry` answers "what
   would this merge release" without pushing.
 
+  **The analyzer reads the type and ignores the scope, so a CI-only change
+  is `ci:` and never `fix(ci):`.** The scope is decoration; `fix` is a
+  patch whatever is in the brackets. Two commits touching nothing but
+  `.gitea/workflows/unclaim.yml` were written `fix(ci):` and cut `v0.2.1`
+  and `v0.2.2` — real releases, published to Arch, Homebrew and the APK
+  registry, containing no user-facing change. They were left in place
+  rather than deleted, because a version that vanishes is worse for
+  whoever pulled it than one that turns out to be empty.
+
+  **The blast radius is bigger than the version number**, which is what
+  makes this worth a paragraph. A merge to `main` starts two workflows;
+  if `release.yml` then pushes a tag, that tag push starts **four more**
+  (`arch-package`, `homebrew-formula`, `android-apk`, `desktop-assets`) —
+  on a runner with capacity 1, where the APK build alone is tens of
+  minutes. `make release-dry` before merging is how you find out, and it
+  is cheaper than every one of those.
+
   **`@semantic-release/github` is not in that config and must not be.**
   Gitea's API is `/api/v1` and is not GitHub's surface, so
   `@semantic-release/exec` calls `scripts/gitea-release.sh` instead — one

e2e/specs/album-dropdown.spec.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
 import { test, expect } from '../support/fixtures.js';
 import type { Page } from '@playwright/test';
 
+/**
+ * How far the scroll test scrolls. One constant, because the guard and
+ * the assertion have to agree about it — they did not, which is #133.
+ */
+const SCROLL_TARGET = 80;
+
 /**
  * Plan 007 phase 5: expanding an album shows its tracks.
  *
@@ -104,20 +110,27 @@ test.describe('the album dropdown', () => {
     await app.setViewportSize({ width: 900, height: 600 });
 
     try {
-      await expect.poll(() => scrollRange(app)).toMatchObject({
-        scrollable: true,
-        overflowY: 'auto',
-      });
+      // Wait for the range the assertion below actually needs, not for
+      // "scrollable at all" (#133). The guard used to be
+      // `scrollHeight > clientHeight + 40` while the next line asks to
+      // reach 80, so any range in 41-79 satisfied it and could not
+      // satisfy the assertion — and the grid passes through exactly
+      // that while it settles, because it recomputes its columns after
+      // the resize rather than during it. The settled range here is
+      // 330, so this waits rather than weakening anything.
+      await expect
+        .poll(() => scrollRange(app))
+        .toMatchObject({ room: true, overflowY: 'auto' });
 
-      await app.evaluate(() => {
+      await app.evaluate((target) => {
         const sc = document
           .querySelector('cover-grid')
           ?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.grid-scroll-container');
 
-        if (sc) sc.scrollTop = 80;
-      });
+        if (sc) sc.scrollTop = target;
+      }, SCROLL_TARGET);
 
-      expect(await scrollTop(app)).toBe(80);
+      expect(await scrollTop(app)).toBe(SCROLL_TARGET);
 
       // And the dropdown it opens is on screen, wherever the manager
       // decides that leaves the scroll. It is *not* "the position is
@@ -250,16 +263,19 @@ async function closeDropdown(app: Page): Promise<void> {
 
 /** Whether the grid can scroll at all, which decides if a probe can move. */
 async function scrollRange(app: Page) {
-  return app.evaluate(() => {
+  return app.evaluate((target) => {
     const sc = document
       .querySelector('cover-grid')
       ?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.grid-scroll-container');
 
     return {
-      scrollable: !!sc && sc.scrollHeight > sc.clientHeight + 40,
+      // `room` is the precondition of the assertion that follows it:
+      // enough range to actually reach the target. A threshold below
+      // what the caller depends on is not a guard.
+      room: !!sc && sc.scrollHeight - sc.clientHeight >= target,
       overflowY: sc ? getComputedStyle(sc).overflowY : '',
     };
-  });
+  }, SCROLL_TARGET);
 }
 
 async function scrollTop(app: Page): Promise<number> {