2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
logan	29feb4b94b	feat(android): the touch model reaches the other three lists ... Plan 019 phases 3 and 4, which finish #63. The queue panel and both playlist detail views get tap-to-play and hold-to-select; the playlist views get swipe-to-queue as well. Phase 3 was not the pure wiring the plan expected, in two places. A tap on a queue row plays that position. Copying track-list's tap -- which sets the queue to the list the row is in -- would rebuild the queue from the queue, discarding its source, its shuffle order and anything inserted by hand. It reads as a no-op and is not one. And the queue panel has no swipe, deliberately. A right swipe means add to the queue everywhere else it exists, and a queue row is already in the queue; the only thing it could mean there is remove, which is the same gesture with the opposite effect one screen away. Removing a queue row is on the row, on its sheet since #60, and now on its selection bar. The assertion is that its rows do not opt in. The reveal became utils/swipe-to-queue.ts rather than being copied into three lists, keyed on a data-swipe attribute so one stylesheet carries the touch-action half of the device fix to rows that are called two different things. Phase 4 was already true and is now asserted: a claimed tap has its click swallowed, so an explore-link inside a row never sees one and tap-to-play wins with no rule of its own. Its test was vacuous when written -- the tap helper sent no click, so there was nothing to swallow -- which also weakened phase 1's. It sends one now. Escape leaves selection mode, from selection-bar rather than from each of the four hosts, since that element exists only while the mode does. The platform's back gesture deliberately does not reach it: the shell owns the history stack and four lists reaching for history is four stacks. That is #200. Verified on the reference phone: a queue row taps to its own index and refuses a swipe, a playlist row queues on a swipe and plays its playlist on a tap, and a hold raises the bar without the menu. Closes #63	2026-08-22 01:41:21 -04:00
logan	76e1c444cc	feat(android): tap to play, hold to select ... Phase 1 of #63, and the design the issue asks for as one piece is .planning/plans/active/019-android-touch-model.md. **A finger has no second button and no modifier keys**, so the primary action has to be the primary gesture: tap plays the row, and the hold that opened a context menu now enters selection mode with that row selected. Three decisions in it, and two diverge from the report. **The predicate is the pointer, not the platform or the viewport.** `pointerType === 'touch'`, per event, which is already how long-press.ts decided and is the only such test in the frontend. This is #64's rule -- named after the capability -- and it carries #64's warning: keyed on a width, an Android *tablet* at 600px gets click-selects/double-click-plays on a touchscreen, which is the inversion this issue exists to fix, on the platform it exists for. A touchscreen laptop cannot be described by a width at all. Per event, a mouse keeps desktop semantics on the very same row, and there is no second declaration of what a phone does. **There is no double-tap, and the number is why.** The report asks for single tap to play *and* double tap for the menu. Those cannot both be honoured: the first tap of a double tap is indistinguishable from a single tap until the interval expires, so "tap plays" becomes "tap waits". Measured on the device, the play command to TrackChanged is 155/123/85/56/91 ms -- median ~100 -- and the app's own DOUBLE_CLICK_GRACE_MS is 250. That is 3.5x the primary interaction, 250ms of it spent deliberately doing nothing, on every track anyone plays, to reach a menu the hold already reaches. So the menu and the selection action bar are the same surface, which is also the platform's convention and removes a concept rather than adding one. **Tap-to-play and selection mode ship together**, because splitting them is a regression dressed as an increment: a touch user selects by tapping today and acts through the long-press menu, so moving tap to play on its own would leave a window with no way to select forty tracks at all. **What lets this reassign the hold without touching one of the fourteen context menus**: the layer announces `yj-tap` / `yj-long-press` (composed, cancelable) and acts on nothing. A component claims one with preventDefault. An **unclaimed long press still becomes a `contextmenu`**, so the card grids, Explore, the playlist rows and every other menu behave exactly as they did, and only lists that opt in get selection mode. An unclaimed *tap* does nothing at all and the click follows normally, which is what leaves every button in the app alone -- only a claimed tap has its click swallowed, or playing a track would also select it. **And the device found the one thing no browser tier can see.** Chrome 113's Android WebView fires its own `contextmenu` on a long press. long-press.ts stood down when a trusted one arrived, which was right while both paths ended in a context menu; they no longer do, so standing down means the gesture silently does the *old* thing. Measured, before the fix, holding a track row: {"log":["contextmenu isTrusted=true"], "state":{"bar":null,"menuActive":true,"selected":1}} `yj-long-press` was never announced, the menu opened, and all 26 tests passed -- dispatched pointer events do not make a browser synthesise one. So the native event is a **trigger, not a competitor**: the gesture is announced from it and only a claim suppresses it. Unclaimed it propagates untouched, which is the same "browser wins" outcome reached by asking instead of assuming. The tier could not find that and can hold it, because this module has always told its own events apart by identity rather than isTrusted, so an untrusted one from a test takes exactly the browser's path. Verified on the device by *performing* the gestures rather than describing the page -- `adb shell input tap` and `input swipe x y x y 700` reach the WebView as real pointer events, which is new here and is written down in the plan with the pixel mapping. Tap plays; a hold raises the bar with one selected and no menu; a tap toggles to two, back to one, and the mode ends with the last row; an album card still opens its context menu. 29 new tests. The e2e spec is rewritten to assert **both** halves -- the row selects, and a card elsewhere still opens the real menu -- because a spec that only checked the row would pass on a build that had silently broken the other thirteen. Phases 2-4 (swipe to queue, the other three surfaces, and what #67 inherits) are in the plan and not in this commit.	2026-08-22 00:23:33 -04:00