Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
yonluandClaude Opus 5.5 ef89707bb1 feat(download): fill in the tracks a nearly complete album is missing
A grab that delivers nine of twelve tracks clears the completeness floor
and is imported, and the other three were never looked for. On Soulseek
that is the commonest way an album ends up almost right: one peer's
folder lacks a track, or one file fails.

After a successful import the manager now compares the tracks the files
were aligned to (ImportResult.Matched, new) with the expected tracklist.
When one to three are missing, and fewer than half, it searches for each
one on its own, as the track's artist and title with the album kept for
ranking. It grabs the first auto-acceptable copy that is not from the
source that already failed to supply it, and is not a delegate, which
would place it in its own library. The candidate is trimmed to the one
file aligned to the track. The import uses the album's own request with
ImportOptions.Only, which skips the completeness check and imports only
a file aligned to the missing track, so it is tagged and placed as part
of the album, and anything else the folder brought is left out.

One attempt per track, and nothing here fails the download: the album
is already imported, so a track that cannot be found is logged on the
job and left. slskd accepts one-file folders for a request that expects
one track, which the per-track search needs.

Closes #276

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017HJiuc3ZZhxsPXz3ozTirT
2026-09-26 22:11:03 -04:00
yonluandClaude Opus 5.5 9710c11476 feat(download): one grab per Soulseek peer, several peers at once
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Failing after 2m51s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Skipped
slskd was capped at one transfer per daemon, on the grounds that
Soulseek peers punish clients that ask for too much. That politeness is
per peer: two different users do not compete for anyone's upload slot.
So one slow peer serialised every other Soulseek download behind it.

The manager now takes a per-(provider, peer) lock before any slot, so a
grab waiting on a busy peer does not hold a provider slot another peer
could use, and the slskd default rises to 3, which now counts peers.
The help text says so.

Running grabs at once exposed the folder collision: slskd names a
download's directory after the remote leaf folder, so two peers'
"Greatest Hits" (or any two rips' "CD1") share one directory, and
collect finds files by name there. Grabs whose local folders overlap
now take a package-level lock per folder, in sorted order, keyed on the
full path because two clients can share one daemon.

Closes #272

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017HJiuc3ZZhxsPXz3ozTirT
2026-09-26 17:31:35 -04:00
yonluandClaude Opus 5.5 0a33b9d653 fix(download): try the next acceptable copy when a transfer fails
A failed transfer failed the whole download.  On Soulseek the usual
failure is one peer being offline or refusing, and a popular album has
several other peers offering the same folder; the ranked list that
names them was already held in m.results and nothing walked it.

grab now loops: when a candidate's transfer fails, or delivers too
little of the album to import, the next candidate is tried in its
place, up to three in all.  Three rules keep that honest:

- Only a candidate auto-pick would itself have accepted is offered, so
  a second choice clears the same match, quality and guardrail gates
  as the first.
- On Soulseek the failure is the peer's, so every folder that peer
  offered is skipped with it; elsewhere only the failed release is.
- A candidate the user picked by hand does not fall back.  They chose
  that copy, and quietly substituting another is a decision they did
  not make.

The same change fixes auto-pick grabbing the wrong candidate.
AutoPickVeto judges the best candidate inside the user's guardrails,
but Start and Attempt then grabbed ranked[0] -- so when the overall best
was over the size ceiling, the veto passed on the strength of the
second and the first was downloaded anyway: the one copy the user had
said not to take unattended.  autoPick returns the candidate the veto
actually judged.

Closes #263

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017HJiuc3ZZhxsPXz3ozTirT
2026-09-26 16:12:06 -04:00
yonluandClaude Opus 5 3d375adab1 feat(downloads): bound auto-pick by bitrate, and take a good copy
Three faults, one subsystem, and the middle one is why a request that
looked obviously satisfiable came back refused.

**The guardrails were in megabytes, which cannot mean anything.** 300 MB
is a generous FLAC single and a suspiciously small boxset, and whoever
fills the field in has no idea which release the pipeline will apply it
to. `MinKbps`/`MaxKbps`/`PreferredKbps` are the same statement divided
by how long the music is, so one number holds across a nine-minute EP
and a three-hour opera. The runtime comes from `Download.Expected`,
which every anchored request already carries, so this costs no lookup;
the rate is audio bytes over that, falling back to the mean stated
per-file bitrate when the runtime is unknown. Artwork is excluded from
the numerator, or a folder with 30 MB of scans reads as a better rip.

An unknown runtime *passes* the window rather than failing it: the
window is a statement about quality, and refusing everything the moment
MusicBrainz is missing a track length would be a silent embargo.
`MaxFileSizeMB` survives as a separate ceiling, still in megabytes on
purpose -- it is a question about disk space, and it has to apply to a
candidate whose bitrate cannot be worked out at all.

**Auto-pick required daylight over the runner-up**, 0.08 on the
combined score, and so fired hardest in the case it was never written
for: a popular album turns up five *correct* copies, all matching the
tracklist at 95%+ and differing only in format and seeders, their
scores land within a point of each other, and it refused forever on the
grounds that the choice was the user's. It was not. There was no
question about what to fetch, only about which copy -- and abundance is
the condition under which that matters least. A candidate no longer has
to beat the field, only clear the bars on its own terms; where several
do, ranking puts the one closest to the preferred bitrate first.

That tie-break needed the preference to carry weight or it would have
been decorative in a new unit: `BitrateFit` was 0.05 against format's
0.42, so asking for 320 and being handed a FLAC every time was the
designed behaviour. When a preference is set the weights shift to fit
0.40 / format 0.20 / bitrate 0.10, taking it off the two heuristics
that exist as stand-ins for the preference the user has now given.
Health and priority are untouched. And the fit spans 0.5 to 1.0 rather
than 0 to 1, so a preference can promote the copy that matches it and
can never push the others under `minQuality` -- turning "I like 320"
into "never take anything else" silently is what `MinKbps`/`MaxKbps`
are for, out loud.

**And a refusal quoted numbers that passed.** The request list built its
message from `ranked[0]` -- the best candidate *before* the guardrails
and before the lead check -- so a request killed by the size window, or
by having too many good copies, reported "best of 12 found is not a
confident enough match (match 96%, quality 88%)". `AutoPickVeto` names
the gate that actually refused, and `AutoPickable` is that returning
empty.

Existing configs: the old `MinFileSizeMB`/`PreferredFileSizeMB` are not
migrated. A number meaning "300 MB" cannot be reinterpreted as a rate
without knowing the album it was aimed at, so carrying it over would be
inventing an intent nobody expressed. Those two fall back to no window,
which is the permissive default and what a fresh install gets;
`MaxFileSizeMB` carries over unchanged, because a ceiling on bytes
still means exactly what it did.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MeQt5hgXg5YGoNZQ9ozG7L
2026-08-17 22:10:51 -04:00
yonluandClaude Sonnet 5 65333857e2 refactor(download): rename Want/Request to Request/Download, unify downloads flow, add auto-download guardrails
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m2s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 7s
The durable "I asked for this" record was called Want, and the one-shot
search-and-grab attempt was called Request — names that didn't match
what either actually did. Want is now Request, and the old Request/Item
is now Download/DownloadItem, with a table-rename migration
(download_wants -> download_requests, old download_requests ->
download_downloads) safe against both fresh installs and existing data.

Every anchored manual download now upserts/reuses a durable Request
before running, so a "download now" that finds nothing is picked up by
the background reconciler automatically instead of just failing with
no trace — the gap that caused this session's repeated "no candidates
found" failures on the same album.

Also adds auto-download guardrails (file-size min/max with a preferred
target, allowed file types) that gate what the pipeline may grab
unattended, live-editable from a new settings section. The frontend's
wanted-view becomes downloads-view, with a new Downloads tab showing
attempt/transfer history that previously had no UI at all.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y2Agd9af5hE7qzti2ackiS
2026-08-10 14:35:57 -04:00
yonluandClaude Sonnet 5 cbd82a5a74 feat: autotag mixed-bag splitting, search relevance fixes, and multi-library download imports
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m2s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 7s
Autotag: detect "junk drawer" folders with no artist/album consensus
and split them into synthetic per-cluster groups instead of forcing
one match on an unrelated pile of tracks; repair tagging_items rows
left behind by a prior scan orphan-cleanup gap.

Explore: fix an exact artist-name search being drowned out by its own
catalog entries in intent-prior scoring, and prune stale in_library
bookkeeping left behind when a referenced library row is deleted.

Download: fix a multi-library regression where every import failed
with "no library root configured" — the importer resolved the
library root from a legacy single-library config field that nothing
populates in the current multi-library model. It now resolves the
destination library per-request from the request's own library_id.
Also widen the Soulseek search window (12s -> 20s), measured against
real request history to be missing available peers on live queries.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y2Agd9af5hE7qzti2ackiS
2026-08-10 11:52:26 -04:00
yonluandClaude Sonnet 5 e190fd75b9 feat: data lifecycle rewrite, download clients, wanted list, and central catalog index
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m12s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 2h22m28s
Ships the fresh-start schema cleanup: rebuilt explore catalog index
pipeline (dump import, artifact fetch/build, incremental listen-count
refresh), a new download subsystem (Lidarr/Prowlarr/qBittorrent/SABnzbd/
slskd/yt-dlp providers, staging, reconciliation, wanted list), and the
supporting schema/query/store changes across backend and frontend.

Also includes two smaller follow-ups: bump the central index's
rebuild-after cadence from 90 to 180 days, and remove the Explore
"library only" online/offline toggle entirely (frontend-only, no
backend counterpart) rather than carry unused UI/state.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y2Agd9af5hE7qzti2ackiS
2026-08-06 17:12:01 -04:00