Commit Graph
23 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
logan 6e563f3846 docs: record what shipping the release pipeline taught us
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m27s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m8s
Moves plan 017 to completed with a recap, and lifts the three findings
that generalise into NOTES.md: a preset major that renders empty notes
with everything green, a 403 that looks like branch protection and is a
token scope, and tag-triggered workflows running the tagged commit's
own definitions.
2026-08-17 23:35:59 -04:00
logan b3a0814f24 docs: describe the release pipeline where the claims used to be wrong
CLAUDE.md said .releaserc.yml was a config nothing ran and that there
were five workflows; both stop being true with this branch. The CI
section now names release.yml as the entry point and records the four
things in it that are load-bearing, including the two silent failure
modes worth pinning against.

packaging/homebrew/README.md and docs/android-release.md say where a
user would actually look that upgrading from 1.x needs a reinstall --
Homebrew offers nothing silently, and Android refuses outright.
2026-08-17 18:43:17 -04:00
yonlu 4fc0cdeab7 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into wails-v3 2026-08-17 08:29:21 -04:00
yonluandClaude Opus 5 b3737d30af feat(explore): carry multi-artist credits in the catalog
A track credited to more than one artist has exactly one navigable
artist in this app and the rest are punctuation. `primaryArtist()`
string-parses the credit, strips a " feat. " clause and discards the
guest; it deliberately does not split on "&", "with" or "," because
those live inside real artist names.

Measured on a real 26,069-file library plus an 80+80 MusicBrainz
sample: 13% of recordings are multi-artist upstream, while only 0.86%
of files carry any structured multi-artist tag — mp3 carries zero
files with multiple MUSICBRAINZ_ARTISTID across 19,840. Of 1,286 files
saying "feat.", 90% have nothing structured behind it, and a sample of
80 such files was multi-artist in MB 80 times out of 80.

CLAUDE.md justified plan 013's removal of the credit tables with "3
credits of 2,823 listed more than one artist". That measured our own
*writer* — cachedLinkArtist was called once per credit, so a
collaboration could never have been recorded. Dropping the join table
was still right on cost; the evidence for "multi-artist is rare" was
not.

A credit is ordered parts and the credit string is derived from them,
so join phrases are assembly instructions, not disassembly ones.
Nothing here reconstructs a credit by searching a name inside a credit
string: the stored text may come from tags while the parts come from
the catalog, and those disagree for ~1 in 3 multi-artist credits.

Where it comes from, after two dead ends: the canonical dump CI
already streams has no join phrases and no as-credited names, and the
JSON dumps cover 153,691 recordings of ~35M with *zero* overlap
against a real library. So mbdump.tar.bz2 — 7.1 GB, ~13.7 min in
pure-Go bzip2, whose members are alphabetical, which is what lets one
pass resolve an entity's credit without buffering 35M recordings.

- artist_credit_part / artist_credit_ref, multi-artist credits only:
  a single-artist credit is already explore_index's own artist_name.
- Column layouts verified against the real 20260815 export;
  ErrDumpShape makes a wrong guess a failed build, not a wrong catalog.
- The pass runs on every mode, not just a build. The job picks its mode
  from the index's own state, and a complete import means "refresh",
  which never enters the importer — so credits could otherwise only
  arrive via a rebuild that re-downloads ~205 GB. It reports whether it
  populated anything, which is what flips `changed` and republishes.
- The importer asks whether an artifact carries the tables, on the
  writer where `core` is attached, so the artifact already published
  still imports.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AfVYUVExXsx1nSWrXN8mAh
2026-08-17 08:25:36 -04:00
logan a7a33527c4 docs: record what the Android work established and disproved
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m26s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 5m51s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m32s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 6s
CLAUDE.md said `wails3 task common:update:build-assets` regenerates
build/ios/ and build/android/. It does not: in beta.8 that command
extracts only updatable_build_assets, which is darwin/ios/linux/windows,
and the android tree comes from `generate build-assets`. It also said
nfpm's homepage and license are left alone by the refresh -- a comment
in that file says the same -- and a refresh reset them to wails.io and
MIT. Both corrected, and the CI section now describes five workflows.

NOTES.md gains the measurements: what cross-compiles and what does not,
the emulator environment, the Wails Android documentation's own two
errors, and the one line that stops the app at runtime --
buildUserDirPath switches on runtime.GOOS and Android takes the default
branch returning errUnsupportedOS, so main() calls os.Exit(1) six
milliseconds after the JNI bridge comes up.

The fix is a documented, build-tag-free API:
application.Mobile.StoragePath() returns the app's private files
directory and returns "" on desktop, and resolveUserDirPath already
lets YJ_HOME override the path on every OS. Deliberately not taken here
-- plan 015 is a pipeline, not a port, and the larger question it does
not answer is that open-directory dialogs return an error on Android
while this app's entire first run is "choose your music folder".
2026-08-16 15:31:18 -04:00
logan c94c97f604 docs: move plan 009 to completed
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m4s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m32s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 7s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 5m59s
2026-08-13 15:18:22 -04:00
logan 4801ba4480 docs: close plan 009, and what a decision phase found
Two of Phase 2's three judgement calls were answered by reading the
code rather than by choosing: there is no artist badge to make a
button, and a track badge stops reading as noise the moment it means
something. The third went the other way — `EntityRecording` reads like
a placeholder and is real work.
2026-08-13 15:18:17 -04:00
logan 979c6e83ed docs: open plan 009 and record what phase 1 found
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m4s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 7s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m32s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 6m21s
The plan's own framing was wrong in a way worth keeping: the badge was
not waiting on the download client, which had largely landed already —
it was waiting on somebody looking at a state nothing produced.
2026-08-13 14:14:39 -04:00
logan d33dfb2264 docs: record phase 4, and the counts a new guard has to agree with
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m2s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m47s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 8s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 6m11s
Plan 008 is complete and moves to completed/. The two findings worth
carrying forward are that a new table needs one schema file rather than
two (and a datamap entry, which is a gate nobody remembers), and that
excluding a path has to reach every place that counts what is in the
library — the soft scan's disk-vs-database comparison above all, which
would otherwise have rescanned the whole library on every launch with
nothing failing anywhere.
2026-08-13 13:30:37 -04:00
logan 91bab4e73e docs: record the a11y tail, and four names written where nothing reads
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m2s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m32s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 6s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 6m20s
Phase 3 shipped in six landings and a11y.md is closed, which closes all
four audits from 2026-08-11.

The pass's one lesson is that an accessible name is computed on the
element carrying the role, and every tier we check with looks somewhere
else: the audit read the source and credited a name that was never
computed, an AX sweep read the tree and reported a placeholder-only box
as clean, and a component test asserted the attribute and pinned the
bug it existed to prevent.

Six of the audit's claims turned out to be wrong or smaller than
written, and one of the plan's own findings was false — the page
header's sort control is named on all nine views. All of them are
written down, which is where a third of the value of the last two plans
came from.
2026-08-13 02:32:33 -04:00
logan 7410109884 docs: record the semantic palette landing, and one claim that was false
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 6s
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m9s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m31s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 5m22s
The two findings recorded as too big for the contrast pass are fixed, so
the plan says so. Also corrects a claim I made and did not check: the
chrome does not stay dark under the light ramp -- that screenshot was
taken before the theme propagated, which is the third time in two passes
a picture read at the wrong moment produced a confident wrong claim.
2026-08-13 01:08:17 -04:00
logan fd32ce71d2 docs: record phase 2, and what a parked measurement was hiding
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m7s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m14s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 7s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 5m23s
The audit's one 'borderline ~4.1:1' pair was nine of twelve failing
combinations across three ramps, 110 nodes on screen, worst 2.31:1. The
other never-measured item closed on measurement and stays dropped, now
for a reason with a number behind it. Two findings larger than either
are recorded and deliberately not fixed: the semantic colours are fixed
across ramps, and the light ramp is not a supported theme.
2026-08-13 00:36:09 -04:00
logan 31144e5dc7 docs: record phase 1, and the state a fix lands in
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m2s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m32s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 7s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 5m27s
Three a11y findings shipped. The generalisation is the mirror of 'a
finding creates the conditions for the next one': that one is about the
code path a fix opens, this one about the path it sends people to. The
reduced-motion guard is two lines and both bugs behind it were in the
fallback it routes users into -- one of which had been wrong in every
mode, including the default, since the component was written.
2026-08-12 23:35:40 -04:00
logan 0a0da0c19c docs: close plan 007 and open 008 on the last open audit
All six phases of 007 shipped. The plan moves to completed/ with a recap
rather than a rewrite: its seven "where the plan was wrong" lists are
seventy-nine entries and about a third of them are the audit being wrong,
which is the material 008 is planned against.

008 is a11y.md, the only audit with open items and the least verified
material in the repo. A grep pass closes at least five findings the
coverage map still shows open, including a11y.7, which the map assigns to
phase 6 and which phase 1 fixed. The triage in the plan is recorded as
hypotheses for that reason.
2026-08-12 22:43:10 -04:00
logan 1e4a4e6f8e docs: record phase 6, and the shelf that repeated with no ids in common
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m2s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m14s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 6s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 4m50s
Twelve corrections to a plan written before any of phases 1-5 existed,
of which the load-bearing one is that a rule written against a
mechanism does not cover what the rule is for: `home` suppresses a
repeated shelf by comparing album ids, Explore's first two shelves hold
different entity types and share none, and the page repeated itself
anyway because a person reads artists.
2026-08-12 18:19:27 -04:00
logan f5621bf7c5 docs: record the fourth pass, and the bugs hiding behind three findings
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m4s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m41s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 8s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 4m55s
Each of perf.p2, H-13 and the dialog naming had a second defect behind
the one named, reachable only once the first fix made the code path run.
Also records two probe failures worth more than the fixes: the a11y
snapshot cannot see a dialog's accessible name at all, and a scroll
assertion that could not fail was hiding both a bug and a false claim.
2026-08-12 15:29:59 -04:00
logan d681a7223e docs: record the audio clock, and that CI is green
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m2s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m18s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 6s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 4m33s
The e2e job passes on both engines for the first time, so the three
files that describe it as red are wrong. Also records the two things
that made it findable: the CI container is reproducible under Docker,
and the app's own audio stack had to be the thing measured.
2026-08-12 14:03:09 -04:00
logan 425dd7c158 docs: record the third Phase 5 pass, and read the CI log
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m0s
CI / check (push) Failing after 2m31s
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 6s
The e2e failure two sessions could not diagnose is the container's
audio clock, on both engines — 48 specs pass under Chromium and 48
under WebKit, failing the same three. Nothing in last pass's dialog,
focus or role work is WebKit-specific.

Also records what got in the way of knowing that: gitea_ci's job-log
endpoint 404s on this build while the REST API answers fine, and the
WebKit step had been skipped on every red run.
2026-08-12 12:42:15 -04:00
logan 63d11c3f9c docs: record the second Phase 5 pass and what it corrected
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 1m57s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m19s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 6s
CI / e2e (push) Failing after 3m2s
Three of a11y.md's findings describe a build that no longer exists —
one fixed by a phase that was not about it, one whose stated mechanism
stopped being true when Phase 4 bundled the icons, and one that
reproduces as a different shape. The generalisation is that a finding
has a date as well as a magnitude and a mechanism.

Also records the two bad versions of the duplicate-shelf rule that the
*existing* tests caught, the eleven e2e specs that landing on Home
broke and the one of them that was a real bug, and the second CI e2e
failure on a commit that changed no application code.
2026-08-12 11:44:58 -04:00
logan 3269da3e92 docs: record the first Phase 5 pass and what it corrected
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 1m59s
CI / check (push) Failing after 2m37s
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 6s
Two reproductions in this pass were read before Lit had rendered, so
both reported the same answer on the broken build and the fixed one -
the third costume of this plan's most-repeated trap, and the first time
it has appeared in a reproduction rather than a measurement. Also
records that the audit's symptom for H-11 outlives its mechanism, that
fixing H-7's arithmetic does not remove every clipped Duration, and
that two e2e specs spend backend state they never give back.
2026-08-12 02:37:49 -04:00
logan 9e92721bb7 docs: record plan 007, its four audits, and what measuring corrected
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 1m58s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m47s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 7s
CI / e2e (push) Failing after 2m52s
`.planning/audits/2026-08-11-ui/` is the pass this work came from: the
app driven by hand headless plus three static reviews, ~118 findings
that are really five problems, each spread by being copied rather than
fixed. `.planning/plans/active/007-ui-reconciliation.md` sequences them
by blast radius and records what each of the six passes actually
shipped — including twenty-five entries under "where the plan was
wrong", which is the point of writing it down.

The discipline those entries add up to, now in NOTES.md: a finding is
three hypotheses — how big it is, why it is that big, and what to do
about it — and they can be independently right and wrong. Three of the
audit's recommended fixes would have shipped a bug (`m1` stops the
card grids repainting, `m6`'s index-ordered selection goes stale on
any re-sort, `m5`'s guard leaves the marquee short), all three because
they reasoned from the shape of the code and not from what the rest of
the file already knew about it. Five findings evaporated or inverted
on contact.

CLAUDE.md gains the invariants that came out of it, and the skill
gains the fourteen measurement traps, each of which produced a wrong
number first — the newest being that a longtask entry arrives after
the task that produced it, so two numbers that must agree are worth
more than one you have to be sceptical about.
2026-08-12 01:20:13 -04:00
logan c48123f7a3 docs(planning): move plan 005 to completed with a recap 2026-08-10 23:56:31 -04:00
logan 5ca6cad45a feat(harness): agent-drivable dev harness and CI that gates
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m8s
CI / check (push) Failing after 1m56s
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 13s
A coding agent could develop this repo's Go packages and could not
develop the application: every path to running YellowJacket ended in a
blocking GTK window, so 265 bound methods, 46 events, 33 component
directories and 13 stores had exactly one form of verification
available — `tsc --noEmit`.

The unlock is that `wails dev`'s dev server on :34115 serves the real
frontend with the real generated bindings against the same Go backend a
desktop window attaches to, so a plain Chromium under Xvfb gets a fully
functional app. Four test tiers now exist, cheapest first:

- `make ui-test` — 313 Vitest tests in a real browser in ~2 s, no app,
  no backend, no display. Works because `frontend/wailsjs/` is a pure
  passthrough to `window.go`/`window.runtime`, so faking just those two
  globals runs the real bindings and the real store code.
- `make test` — services in-process, asserting on the payload the
  frontend would receive, via a new `events.Emit` wrapper.
- `make dev-headless` + `playwright-cli` — the real app, driven
  interactively, with an event bridge on `window.__yjEvents` and a
  dev-only control surface at `/__test/`.
- `make e2e` — 19 of those flows frozen as Playwright specs.

`events.Emit(ctx, …)` replaces all 35 direct `runtime.EventsEmit` call
sites: wails' `getEvents` `log.Fatalf`s on any context without its
runtime, so those paths could not run under test and a background
worker could take the app down. Four packages had each hand-rolled the
same guard; nine more guarded on `ctx != nil`, which does not help.
`TestNoDirectRuntimeEmits` fails the build on a new one.

Fixtures are generated, not committed (`make testdata`), and seeds are
built by *running the app* — never by hand-writing config and DB rows,
which would be a second description of a valid YJ_HOME.

`.gitea/workflows/ci.yml` is the first workflow here that tests
anything; the other three only package, so `gitea_ci` reported only
packaging jobs and misled anyone asking whether a push was healthy.
Both jobs were prototyped to green in a bare ubuntu:24.04 container
before the YAML was written, which immediately caught `make lint`
linting three configurations that nothing builds: all three passes
omitted `webkit2_41`, so wails resolved webkit2gtk-4.0 — which Arch
still ships and Ubuntu 24.04 dropped.

Operational instructions live in `.pi/skills/yellowjacket-dev/`,
measured discoveries in `.planning/NOTES.md`, and architecture in
`CLAUDE.md` — split by tense, not by topic, because a topical split
gives every new fact two plausible homes. `make skill-check` fails a
commit if the skill cites a make target that does not exist.
2026-08-10 23:20:42 -04:00