logan
0d331666d6
The first pass grew the two square controls to 44px as boxes, which
added 22px to the header. That fit at every width Chromium was checked
at and **clipped the overflow trigger at 320x600 in WebKit** -- the
engine closest to what ships, and the one no machine here can run:
every action is reachable at 320x600 (400% zoom)
- Array []
+ Array [ "more" ]
Two things were wrong, and only one of them was the code.
**The claim was checked on one engine and stated as a property.** The
previous commit said #69's fit "does not move ... the check rather than
the assumption", on the strength of running that spec against chromium
alone. CI runs both browsers precisely because they are not the same
answer.
**And the box was the wrong thing to grow**, which the issue already
said: "reached by growing the *hit* area rather than the visual weight
where the two can differ -- padding on the control, not size on the
icon". #69's pass measures inline size, so a taller control is free and
a wider one is not.
So height stays a box -- the header has the room and nothing measures
it -- and width is padding with a negative margin handing the space
back, which is the seek bar's shape from #187. Measured in the
component tier at 320px: the arrow's rect is 45x44 and it occupies 29,
the overflow trigger 44x44 occupying 38, the search button 44x44
occupying 40. Those three occupancies are what they were before any of
this, so the fit pass sees a header identical to main's and the
320px case cannot regress.
The arrow's target is lopsided for #187's reason: the select is 6px to
its left and there is open space to its right, so it takes the side
with nothing to steal from. The overflow trigger's can be symmetric,
the actions row having an 8px gap.
`search-trigger` is border-box, so its 44px min-width is the whole
target and the margin alone gives the four pixels back.
The new assertion is the one that would have caught this: every grown
control must carry negative inline margins, because that is what keeps
the box out of the fit. The rect assertions stay -- getBoundingClientRect
includes padding, so the target is still measured directly rather than
inferred.