logan
78576b8da9
Plan 015 shipped a pipeline; this is what stands between that and an app worth installing. Verified against the source and the generated manifest rather than guessed. Four blockers, and none of them is porting work. The manifest requests no storage or media permission at all, so the app can read no music -- and READ_MEDIA_AUDIO would not be enough, because it grants access through MediaStore while this app's whole model is absolute paths: audio_files.file_path is the primary key of ownership and every GetFilePathsBy... query exists to hand paths to the player. The first-run wizard calls DirectoryPicker, which Wails documents as returning an error on Android, and the wizard intercepts pointer events until a library exists, so the app is inert rather than merely empty. mpris_linux.go is compiled in, because android implies linux. And the scaffold's foreground service is typed dataSync rather than mediaPlayback, with no MediaSession and no audio focus, so playback dies at screen lock and there are no lock-screen controls. They are all the same question: is the Android app a librarian or a player? The desktop app is a librarian -- it scans folders, dedupes covers, rewrites tags on disk -- and that model rests on owning a filesystem, which is exactly what Android declines to give. So the plan argues that parity is the wrong target and lays out three coherent products instead, recommending a MediaStore-backed player. Four things are worth doing whatever is decided, and the highest information-per-minute one needs no code: run the published APK on a real phone. Nothing in sections A or B has been observed on Android, because the x86_64 emulator cannot run the app and emulator 37 refuses arm64 images on an x86_64 host.