logan
df2e9ea777
Section A of plan 016 is closed and B1 is decided, so the three tenses move together: CLAUDE.md for what mediacontrols now is, the skill for what to run, NOTES.md for what was measured and when. The entry worth reading is the one that disproves a claim written here earlier in the same session. Dropping x86_64 was expected to make make android-install fail with INSTALL_FAILED_NO_MATCHING_ABIS. Measured, it installs and launches: Google's google_apis x86_64 images carry arm64 translation (abilist = x86_64,arm64-v8a), so the loader maps lib/arm64/libwails.so and runs it. It dies before any of our code with SIGILL, and the disassembly names the reason exactly -- `mrs x0, ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1`, Go's internal/cpu reading the arm64 feature register at runtime init, which the translator does not implement. So no Go binary starts under it, and that is not a property of this app. Which closes the last plausible shortcut. There are now three distinct ways this app fails on an x86_64 Android -- seccomp on the x86_64 build, an unimplemented system register on the translated arm64 one, and a real device still unverified -- and none of them is a bug in it. A phone remains the only verification path. Plan 016 also carries the B2 scope, now decided rather than recommended: option 1's data model with option 2's surface. The phone gets home, library browse, now-playing-as-a-view, the queue, search and playlists; it does not get autotag, downloads, Explore or the 93-control Settings page, and each of those has a reason written beside it. One rule for the work: no view forks, because a phone template that copies a view's is two templates to fix every bug in.