Files
yellowjacket/frontend/index.css
T
logan 3aa2a434b4
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m44s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 10m10s
feat(android): the tap highlight goes, a press state replaces it
The phone drew a grey box over the bounding rect of whatever was
tapped, which is the web view saying what it is. It is gone in one
declaration: `-webkit-tap-highlight-color` is inherited and an
inherited property crosses a shadow boundary, so `html` in index.css
reaches every shadow root in the app. Measured three roots deep,
rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.18) before and rgba(0, 0, 0, 0) after.

Removing it removes the only touch feedback several surfaces had, so
the press state is part of the same change rather than a later polish
item — with the highlight gone a held row measured the *hover* tint,
which on a phone is synthesised by the hold itself and outlives it.
The four lists' rows, the tab bar, the sidebar's destinations and the
shared context-menu item take --yj-press-overlay on :active; the cards
already had scale(0.97). The press selector carries a state class
because a row is .track-row.selected.active, so a bare :active shows
nothing on the row a phone is most likely to press. And those
surfaces' hover tints move behind (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine),
which is #68's gate applied to a tint rather than a revealed control.

user-select, the other half of the Findings, was already done: the
first rule in index.css covers the shadow roots for the same reason.
touch-action: manipulation is declined — the 300ms delay it is offered
for is already absent on a width=device-width viewport, and what it
would really change is the gesture stack tuned by measurement on a
device this session cannot measure.

Closes #54
2026-08-25 12:51:28 -04:00

649 lines
24 KiB
CSS
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
*,
*::before,
*::after {
-webkit-user-select: none;
user-select: none;
}
html {
height: 100%;
/* #54. The web view's own tap highlight -- the grey box a phone
draws over the bounding rect of whatever was tapped -- gone in
one declaration, because `-webkit-tap-highlight-color` is an
*inherited* property and an inherited property crosses a shadow
boundary. So this reaches every one of the app's shadow roots
without a rule in any of them; before it, exactly one component
(`library-status-indicator`) set it and the box appeared
everywhere else.
What it costs is the only touch feedback several surfaces had,
which is why the rows, the tab bar and the shared menu items
grew a `:active` state in the same change: removing the wrong
feedback and leaving none is not an improvement. The cards
already had one (`transform: scale(0.97)`).
`user-select` is the same argument one rule up and was already
done: the `*` rule at the top of this file is inherited into the
shadow roots too. */
-webkit-tap-highlight-color: transparent;
}
body {
background-color: var(--yj-bg-base, black);
color: var(--yj-text-primary, white);
margin: 0;
height: 100vh;
display: grid;
grid-template: "top-bar top-bar" 4em "sidebar main-panel" 1fr "bottom-bar bottom-bar" 4em / auto 1fr;
/* a11y.21 (WCAG 1.4.10), measured rather than taken as filed.
The finding's mechanism is vertical — "the 4em bars grow while
the viewport does not, and anything that no longer fits is
clipped with no scrollbar" — and that is not what happens. The
middle row is `1fr`, so it absorbs the bars exactly: at 200%
text on an 800×600 window the bars go 64px → 128px and the main
panel goes 472px → 344px, with the footer's bottom still landing
on 600. Nothing is clipped, and Settings stays reachable because
the sidebar scrolls (007 phase 5).
What is real is the other axis, which the finding does not
mention: at 200% text the shell is 1014px wide in an 800px
viewport, and at 320px (400% page zoom of 1280) it is 611px —
291px of the app unreachable behind `overflow: hidden`. So the
horizontal axis scrolls and the vertical one stays fixed, which
is also what keeps the transport bar where a desktop player's
transport bar belongs. At every size this app promises
(800×600 and up, default text) there is no overflow on either
axis and no scrollbar appears. */
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
}
/* Above the phone breakpoint the tab bar does not exist. It is in the
markup unconditionally and eagerly, for the reason notification-host
is: navigation that has to fetch a chunk before it can navigate is
not navigation. */
@media (min-width: 600px) {
bottom-nav {
display: none;
}
}
p {
margin: 0;
/* I want to set paragraph margins myself */
}
/* a11y.30. Out of flow in both states, because `body` is a grid with
named areas and an in-flow extra child is auto-placed into one of
them — the link would silently take a row from the shell. It is not
`display: none`: a skip link that is not focusable is not a skip
link. */
.skip-link {
position: absolute;
left: -9999px;
top: 0;
z-index: 100;
padding: 0.5em 1em;
background-color: var(--yj-accent);
color: var(--yj-accent-fg);
font-weight: 600;
text-decoration: none;
border-radius: 0 0 4px 0;
}
.skip-link:focus {
left: 0;
}
/* The target of that link, so it can take focus at all. `main` is not
focusable by default, and a fragment link to an unfocusable element
moves the scroll and leaves the tab sequence exactly where it was —
which is the whole thing the link exists to change. */
.main-panel:focus {
outline: none;
}
.top-bar {
grid-area: top-bar;
height: 100%;
padding-left: 2em;
padding-right: 2em;
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
background-color: var(--yj-bg-elevated, #343a40);
gap: 1em;
}
.top-bar search-bar {
flex: 0 1 320px;
}
/* What the bar gives up when it does not fit is decided by measuring
it (`services/top-bar-fit.ts`, #143). Two rules here are what make
that measurement mean anything.
**Nothing but the search box may shrink.** `scrollWidth` reports a
perfect fit while a child quietly truncates -- #69's trap, one
component over -- and the indicator's label is `text-overflow:
ellipsis`, so it would have absorbed the deficit and hidden it. The
search box is exempt because it shrinks between its 320px basis and
the 200px floor its own stylesheet sets, and a narrower input hides
nothing it was showing. */
.top-bar hgroup,
.top-bar library-filter,
.top-bar job-indicator {
flex-shrink: 0;
}
/* **The wordmark yields its width, not its existence.** It is the
app's top-level heading as well as its brand, and `display: none`
would take a document from one `h1` to none at exactly the widths
where the view's own header is the only thing left saying where you
are. This is `styles/sr-only.css.ts`'s recipe, written out because
that one is a `CSSResult` for shadow roots and this is the light
DOM. */
.top-bar hgroup.yj-collapsed {
position: absolute;
width: 1px;
height: 1px;
padding: 0;
margin: -1px;
overflow: hidden;
clip-path: inset(50%);
white-space: nowrap;
border: 0;
}
/* The bar is `justify-content: space-between`, which with four children
spreads them evenly and left back/forward floating in the middle of
nothing. Collecting the free space *after* this one puts the pair
beside the brand, where a browser keeps them, and leaves the
right-hand group exactly as it was. */
.top-bar nav-history {
margin-right: auto;
}
ul {
list-style-type: none;
}
.title {
font-size: 1.5em;
/* Both margins, not just the bottom one. The pair is flex-centred
in a 4em bar and the UA gives an h1 a 0.67em top margin, so the
hgroup measured 67px inside 64 and the subtitle's descenders were
clipped by the bar. That was pre-existing; a11y.29 made it
visible by taking the h3's bottom margin away with it, which
shortened the block and moved the whole pair down into the clip.
This is the state that fix landed in. */
margin-block: 0;
}
.subtitle {
font-size: 0.8em;
margin-top: 0;
}
/* The same breakpoint the sidebar collapses at (AUTO_COLLAPSE_VIEWPORT
in app-sidebar.ts). The subtitle wrapped to two lines below ~780 px,
which made the title block 98 px tall inside a 4em bar and pushed it
down into the nav (H-11). */
@media (max-width: 899px) {
.subtitle {
display: none;
}
/* Back/forward is Desktop-band chrome (#6), and 900 is the same
line the sidebar's labels and the subtitle are already given up
at -- below it the shell is narrow enough that the header is
what runs out of room first. Measured at 600, the bottom of the
Compact band: the bar is 611px inside a 600px viewport *before*
this component exists (filed separately), and 695px with it, so
keeping it here would be widening a violation of the promise
that nothing scrolls sideways at a supported size.
Nothing is unreachable as a result, which is the rule that
decides it: Alt+Left / Alt+Right are global and every width has
them, the detail views keep their own back buttons, and the
phone additionally has the platform's gesture. */
.top-bar nav-history {
display: none;
}
}
body div.sidebar {
grid-area: sidebar;
background-color: var(--yj-bg-surface, #212529);
overflow: hidden;
contain: layout style paint;
}
.bottom-bar {
grid-area: bottom-bar;
padding: 0.25em;
background-color: var(--yj-bg-elevated, #343a40);
display: grid;
/* Three columns whose outer two are the *same* width, which is what
centres the middle one (#23). It was `var(--now-playing-width) 1fr
auto`, so the transport's centre sat at `W/2 + 140px` — in the
middle of the space left over, which is not the same thing and
reads as an alignment mistake at every window size.
The outer width is still `--now-playing-width`, so **the metadata
panel's drag handle keeps meaning something**: widening it takes
room from the transport on both sides at once, symmetrically. An
`1fr … 1fr` pair would have centred the transport just as well and
silently made that handle a no-op.
**The cap is what stops that being a regression**, and it was
measured as one first. Reserving the full metadata width on both
sides costs the transport twice: at 800px the outer pair wanted
640 of 800, and the seek bar's track went from 257px to 61px
(and to 0 at 200% text) — the control you drag, squeezed out to
centre the buttons above it. So the side tracks are the metadata
width *or a quarter of the bar*, whichever is smaller, which
leaves the drag handle meaningful everywhere it has room to be
and hands the difference to the transport where it does not.
`minmax(0, …)` on the outer tracks and `min-content` on the middle
decide who yields when even that is not enough: the metadata and
the end group shrink (both truncate; neither loses an action), and
the transport keeps at least its buttons. Without the `min-content`
floor the middle collapses first, because a `1fr` track's minimum
is `auto` only until something else insists. */
--bar-side: min(var(--now-playing-width, 320px), 25%);
grid-template-columns:
minmax(0, var(--bar-side))
minmax(min-content, 1fr)
minmax(0, var(--bar-side));
align-items: center;
contain: layout style;
#now-playing-info {
justify-self: start;
display: flex;
min-width: 0;
overflow: hidden;
#album-art {
width: 3.5em;
min-width: 3.5em;
height: 3.5em;
min-height: 3.5em;
border-radius: 0.25em;
background-color: var(--yj-accent, #ffd43b);
}
#track-info {
display: flex;
margin-left: 1em;
flex-direction: column;
font-size: 0.75em;
justify-content: center;
text-wrap-mode: nowrap;
overflow: hidden;
/* `& p`, not `p`. **A nested rule that begins with a bare
element selector is silently dropped before Chrome 120**
(relaxed nesting), and the phone this app runs on renders
in Chrome 113 -- so this ellipsis, and the two rules
below, have never applied on the device. Nothing fails;
the text simply overflows there. The `&` form is valid in
both, which is why it is used for every element selector
in this file's nested blocks. */
& p {
overflow: hidden;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
}
}
}
& now-playing {
overflow: hidden;
}
& audio-player {
margin: 0.5em 1em;
min-width: 0;
}
/* The right-hand group, and the thing the left column is matched
against. It is one grid cell rather than two columns because the
centring rule above compares *columns*: volume and the queue
button in separate tracks would make the outer pair unequal by
whatever the volume happens to measure. */
.bar-end {
justify-self: end;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
gap: 0.25em;
min-width: 0;
}
#queue-button {
background: none;
border: none;
color: inherit;
cursor: pointer;
padding: 8px;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
}
#queue-button:hover {
color: var(--yj-accent, #ffd43b);
}
/* An open queue is a state this button can be in, and it used to
look exactly like the closed one -- so the only way to tell what
pressing it would do was to look at the other side of the window
and infer it. `aria-expanded` is the same fact for anyone not
looking at all, and it points at the panel it controls. */
#queue-button[aria-expanded='true'] {
color: var(--yj-accent, #ffd43b);
background: var(--yj-bg-overlay, #404040);
border-radius: 4px;
}
#queue-button.drag-over {
color: var(--yj-accent, #ffd43b);
outline: 2px dashed var(--yj-accent, #ffd43b);
outline-offset: -2px;
border-radius: 4px;
}
}
.content-area {
grid-area: main-panel;
display: flex;
overflow: hidden;
contain: layout style;
/* The containing block for the queue panel's overlay mode (plan
018, #24), which spans this box rather than taking width from
the main panel beside it. `contain: layout` already establishes
one; this says so on purpose, so that removing the containment
for a paint reason does not silently reparent the overlay to the
viewport. */
position: relative;
}
.main-panel {
flex: 1;
min-width: 0;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
background-color: var(--yj-bg-surface, #212529);
overflow: hidden;
contain: layout style paint;
}
.main-panel > * {
flex: 1;
min-height: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
contain: layout style paint;
}
/* Hidden cached views: use visibility+size collapse instead of
display:none so scroll containers preserve their scrollTop.
display:none discards scroll state in WebKitGTK. */
.main-panel > .view-hidden {
visibility: hidden !important;
flex: 0 0 0px !important;
min-height: 0 !important;
max-height: 0 !important;
height: 0 !important;
padding: 0 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
border: none !important;
overflow: hidden !important;
pointer-events: none !important;
contain: strict !important;
}
/* ===================================================================
The phone shell (plan 016 B2).
**This section is last on purpose.** A media query adds no
specificity, so `@media (max-width: 599px) { .title { … } }` placed
above the plain `.title` rule loses to it -- which is exactly what
happened when this landed in the middle of the file: the header kept
its 2em gutters, its 16px gap and its 24px title on a 390px phone,
and every one of these declarations was dead. Nothing failed,
because the shell fits for a different reason (the `min-width: 0`
below and each component's own media query), so a screenshot was
what caught it.
600px, not the sidebar's 900: 900 is a *laptop* and the response to
it is a narrower sidebar, which is still a sidebar. Below 600 there
is no room for one at all -- 360px of viewport over a 200px nav is
not a layout -- so the navigation moves to the bottom, where a thumb
is, and the eleven-item list moves into `bottom-nav`'s drawer.
=================================================================== */
@media (max-width: 599px) {
body {
/* **There is no top-bar row here (#57).** Every one of the five
things that bar held has somewhere else to be below 600px:
`nav-history` is the platform's own gesture (gone from 899
down), the job indicator is `<job-band>` (#62), the search
box is a modal opened from the view's own header
(`search-trigger`), the library filter is Settings ->
Libraries (#148), and the wordmark is below. That is 3.25em
of a 439 CSS px viewport -- the single biggest vertical win
available on the reference device, which is why #57 asks for
the row rather than for a smaller bar. */
grid-template:
"jobs-band" auto
"main-panel" 1fr
"bottom-bar" auto
"progress-line" auto
"bottom-nav" auto
/ 1fr;
/* Nothing may scroll sideways here. On a desktop the shell is
allowed to overflow a zoomed-in window (a11y.21 above); a
phone *is* the small viewport, so the shell has to fit it. */
overflow-x: hidden;
}
body div.sidebar {
display: none;
}
bottom-nav {
grid-area: bottom-nav;
}
/* The bar is out of the layout, and out of it the way the *wordmark*
already goes at desktop widths: visually hidden rather than
`display: none`, because that `h1` is the document's top-level
heading and this app would otherwise have none on the pages whose
own header is empty by design (`page-header` renders no `h1` when
`heading` is '', and Settings has no `page-header` at all).
Its four *controls* are `display: none` below, which is what
keeps them out of the tab order -- a visually-hidden container is
still focusable, and tabbing into a search box nobody can see is
worse than not having one.
This is `styles/sr-only.css.ts`'s recipe again, written out
because that one is a `CSSResult` for shadow roots and this is
the light DOM. `position: absolute` is also what tells
`services/top-bar-fit.ts` there is no row to fit into. */
.top-bar {
position: absolute;
width: 1px;
height: 1px;
padding: 0;
margin: -1px;
overflow: hidden;
clip-path: inset(50%);
white-space: nowrap;
border: 0;
gap: 0;
min-width: 0;
}
.top-bar nav-history,
.top-bar library-filter,
.top-bar search-bar,
.top-bar job-indicator {
display: none;
}
/* `min-width: 0` is load-bearing wherever a box sits between the
viewport and content that must shrink. A grid item's implicit
minimum is `auto` -- its content -- so one child insisting on
580px makes the *body* 580px wide inside a 360px viewport, and
`overflow-x: hidden` then hides the right-hand third of the app
rather than fitting it. */
.content-area,
.main-panel,
.bottom-bar {
min-width: 0;
}
/* The full-screen now-playing view *is* the transport, so the bar
repeating it underneath is 4em of a small screen spent saying
the same thing twice -- visible in a screenshot, invisible to
every assertion about either one.
`:has()` rather than a class toggled from index.ts: which view
is showing is already published as an attribute, and a second
expression of the same fact is a second thing to keep in step.
The view carries its own queue button, because this is where
that one lived. */
body:has(#main-content[data-active-view="now-playing"]) .bottom-bar,
body:has(#main-content[data-active-view="now-playing"]) player-progress-line {
display: none;
}
}
@media (max-width: 599px) {
/* The phone keeps the two-part bar it had: metadata, then the
transport and the queue button. There is no third column to
balance because the centring the desktop does is a luxury of
having room — at 360px the metadata needs all of the space the
controls do not. */
.bottom-bar {
grid-template-columns: minmax(0, 1fr) auto auto;
gap: 0.25em;
}
.bottom-bar audio-player {
margin: 0.25em;
}
/* Volume stands down here whatever the setting says, because this
is about room: five controls and a slider do not fit a 360px
bar, and the full-screen now-playing view is where seeking and
volume go on a phone. It moved from `audio-player`'s own media
query when #42 moved the control into the bar — same rule, and
now stated where the element actually is.
**This rule used to carry the platform argument too, and no
longer does** (#64). "The hardware keys own the volume" is not a
width: it is false of a narrow desktop window and true of an
Android tablet, which this selector gets backwards both ways.
The player answers it now — `SystemOwnsVolume` — and
`volume-control` renders nothing when it is true, at every
width and in both of its mount points. What is left here is the
question a stylesheet can actually answer. */
.bottom-bar volume-control {
display: none;
}
/* The queue leaves the phone's bar (#59), because #55 made it a
screen with an entry in the back stack and Now Playing already
carries its own button for it. The route is the mini player's
art -> Now Playing -> the queue, which is the "reachable only
from Now Playing" this issue asks for.
This is allowed to remove a control only because the control is
still reachable: plan 018's matrix promises that no action is
ever unreachable at any supported size, and that promise is what
`phone-transport.spec.ts` asserts rather than the button count.
**`.bottom-bar #queue-button`, not `#queue-button`**, and that is
not decoration. The rule this overrides is written *nested*
inside `.bottom-bar`, so it builds to a descendant selector one
class more specific than it looks in the source -- and a bare
`#queue-button` here loses to it, media query or not. Being last
in the file is not enough when the thing above is more specific,
which is the same lesson as this section's own header one level
down: nesting adds specificity the source does not show, and the
failure is silent (the button simply stayed). */
.bottom-bar #queue-button {
display: none;
}
}
/* Out of the desktop grid entirely. `job-band` renders nothing above
600px anyway, but an in-flow grid child with no named area is
auto-placed into a row of the shell -- the same trap the skip link is
absolutely positioned to avoid. `player-progress-line` (#58) is the
same element in the same position for the same reason: below 600px it
has a named row, and above it there is no border for it to sit on --
the desktop bar carries a real, interactive seek bar. */
body job-band,
body player-progress-line {
display: none;
}
/* #62. The job indicator stands down on the phone, and its work is
shown in the notification band instead (notification-host).
Three reasons, and the first is the report: its popover is anchored
to the top bar, which is 3.25em here on a viewport 439 CSS px tall,
and it was reported as unreadable behind other UI. The second is
that a popover is a disclosure, and background work is the one thing
a phone should not make you disclose. The third is #57, which
deletes this bar entirely and is blocked on the indicator having
somewhere else to live -- this is that somewhere.
#57 has since done exactly that, so the indicator's own rule now
lives with the other three in the phone block above, where the bar
goes out of the layout in one statement rather than four. What stays
here is the band, and the argument for it. */
@media (max-width: 599px) {
/* The indicator's rows appear here, in the grid row above the content.
In flow rather than over it: a fixed band reads fine in a
screenshot and is unusable, because at 424x439 a compact panel
is ~200px of a 439px screen and it *covers* what is under it.
Measured, not assumed -- four e2e specs failed on that version,
two phone-shell journeys and the header's action menu, because
the panel was intercepting the taps. */
body job-band {
display: block;
grid-area: jobs-band;
background-color: var(--yj-bg-elevated, #343a40);
}
}
/* #58. How far through the song we are, in its own grid row between
the two bars -- so the line is *on* the border rather than inside
either of them, and in flow rather than over it. The row is `auto`
and the element renders nothing while no track is loaded, so it costs
no height at all until there is something to say.
**This block is below the `display: none` above and has to be**, for
the reason the band's rule is: a media query adds no specificity, so
`body player-progress-line { display: block }` written before that
rule loses to it at equal specificity and the line never appears at
any width. Nothing fails; it is simply not there. */
@media (max-width: 599px) {
body player-progress-line {
display: block;
grid-area: progress-line;
}
}