docs: a CI-only change is ci:, not fix(ci):

The commit-analyzer reads the type and ignores the scope, so `fix` is a
patch whatever sits in the brackets. Two commits touching nothing but
.gitea/workflows/unclaim.yml were written `fix(ci):` and cut v0.2.1 and
v0.2.2 -- real releases, published to Arch, Homebrew and the APK
registry, containing no user-facing change.

CLAUDE.md already warned that a mistyped feat ships a minor version.
That was not enough, because this was not a mistyped type: `fix` was
chosen deliberately, in the belief that the (ci) scope qualified it.

The version bump is the small half, which is why this gets a paragraph
rather than a clause. A merge to main starts two workflows; if
release.yml then pushes a tag, that tag push starts four more --
arch-package, homebrew-formula, android-apk and desktop-assets -- on a
runner with capacity 1, where the APK build alone is tens of minutes
and publishes a signed artifact to a public registry. So a mistyped
type is six workflow runs, not an odd-looking changelog.

`make release-dry` answers this before the merge instead of after, and
is cheaper than any one of those runs.

The two releases are staying: they are already published, and a version
that vanishes is worse for whoever pulled it than one that turns out to
be empty.

Closes #111

.planning/NOTES.md

@@ -3580,3 +3580,87 @@ per-card flag can answer at all.
 The general point: **two columns that agree today are not one column.**
 Which of them a new surface reads should be decided by which one has
 something that can un-set it.
+
+## The queue panel was a column that could not afford to be one (measured 2026-08-19)
+
+Plan 018, issue #24. Measured against the running app (`make
+dev-headless SEED=default`, Chromium) on Playlists, sweeping the
+viewport with the queue open and closed. Main panel width, and how much
+of the page header survived:
+
+| viewport | sidebar | main (queue open) | actions clipped |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| 1280×800 | 200 | 759 | — |
+| 1000×700 | 200 | 479 | 2 of 3 |
+| **900×600** | 200 | **379** | all three |
+| 800×600 | 56 | 423 | all three |
+| 390×780 | — | **69** | all three |
+| 320×600 | — | **0** | all three |
+| 800×600 | 56 | 744 *(closed)* | New Smart Playlist, 158/162px |
+
+Five things came out of it that the issue did not say.
+
+- **The header clips at the enforced minimum with the queue closed.**
+  800×600 is the only size this app promises, and "New Smart Playlist"
+  loses 4px of its 162 there. The queue makes it dramatic; it is not
+  the cause.
+- **900×600 is worse than 800×600.** `AUTO_COLLAPSE_VIEWPORT` collapses
+  the sidebar *below* 900, so the main panel is 843px at 899 and 700px
+  at 900. **The worst desktop case is the top of the Compact band, not
+  the enforced floor** — so every viewport list that stopped at "the
+  minimum" was missing its own worst case. `layout-overflow.spec.ts`
+  carries 900 now.
+- **At 320px the main panel was 0px.** The panel is `flex-shrink: 0` in
+  the flow of `.content-area`, so an open queue is paid for by the
+  content rather than covering it. Not degraded — gone. That is the
+  measurement #55 wanted and did not have.
+- **Only Playlists overflows.** All ten primary views swept at 900×600
+  and 390×780; every other header reports `scrollWidth ==
+  clientWidth`, and Albums at 390 renders title, count and sort legibly
+  (checked on a screenshot, not just the number). So #69 is one view's
+  action set — three text buttons totalling 390px — and not a systemic
+  header failure.
+- **Both reasons in `MinWidth`'s comment had expired.** The subtitle is
+  `display: none` from 899 down, and the sidebar host is
+  `overflow-y: auto` (at 600×460, `scrollHeight` 434 against a 332px
+  client, Settings reachable after scrolling). The floor is right; its
+  stated defence was two mechanisms that can no longer happen, which is
+  worse than either answer because nobody can argue with it.
+
+**A correction worth keeping, because it nearly went in the plan.** My
+first probe for the sidebar's scroller searched
+`shadowRoot.querySelectorAll('*')` and reported "no scroller — items
+are unreachable", which reads exactly like a live Settings-unreachable
+bug. The scroller is the **host**, and a host is not inside its own
+shadow root. CLAUDE.md was right and the probe was wrong.
+
+**And one claim in the plan's first draft was too strong**: that the
+overlay "removes the desktop half of #69". After phase 2, at 900×600,
+open and closed are now *identical* (main 700, one action clipped)
+where open used to be main 379 with all three clipped. The queue's
+contribution is gone; the header's own overflow remains and is still a
+live defect at a supported size.
+
+### The mode cannot be a media query
+
+The panel is drag-resizable 200–500px and persisted, so a viewport
+breakpoint assumes the default 320 and is wrong by up to 180px for a
+user who widened it — in the direction that hurts, since a wider queue
+is exactly when the content can least afford it. It is computed from
+`.content-area`'s width instead (which already accounts for the
+sidebar's collapse), and the component test that matters widens the
+panel at a *fixed* parent width and asserts the flip.
+
+The floor (480) is a judgement, and the measurement is why: there is no
+cliff. The track list rescales its columns continuously — 213px down to
+124px between main widths of 900 and 544, `rowOverflow=0` at every step
+— and the album grid steps 3 columns to 2 somewhere between 564 and 644
+without breaking. So 480 is anchored at both ends instead: it keeps the
+default 1100px window inline, and puts every measured-broken case on
+the overlay side.
+
+The scrim is perceptible but subtle on a dark ramp, which is worth
+knowing before someone "fixes" it as broken: sampled from screenshots at
+900×600, the main panel's background goes 33,37,41 → 18,20,23 and a
+row's text 242 → 133. It covers the content area only — not the sidebar
+or the transport — because the queue is not modal.

.planning/plans/active/018-supported-sizes-and-the-queue-model.md

@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
+# 018 — Supported sizes, and what the queue panel is
+
+**Issue:** #24 (`Area/Shell-Nav`, `Priority/High`, `Reviewed/Confirmed`)
+**Unblocks:** #55 (queue as a screen) — a real Gitea dependency
+**Relates:** #69 (page-header overflow), #12 (mini-player), #51 (small-screen umbrella)
+**Status:** in flight
+
+#73 puts this first in Phase 2 and hangs the rest of the phase off it,
+so the decision has to be written down and arguable before any CSS
+moves. This document is the decision. Everything below the matrix is
+either a measurement or an argument for one of the four choices #24
+asks for.
+
+---
+
+## What is actually wrong, measured
+
+Against the running app (`make dev-headless SEED=default`, Chromium),
+Playlists, sweeping the viewport with the queue open and closed. The
+number that matters is how much of the page header survives.
+
+| viewport | sidebar | queue | main panel | header needs | actions clipped |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| 1280×800 | 200 | open 321 | 759 | 759 | — |
+| 1000×700 | 200 | open 321 | 479 | 747 | New Playlist, New Smart Playlist |
+| **900×600** | 200 | open 321 | **379** | 747 | **all three** |
+| 800×600 | 56 | open 321 | 423 | 747 | all three |
+| 700×600 | 56 | open 321 | 323 | 747 | all three |
+| 390×780 | — | open 321 | **69** | 747 | all three |
+| 320×600 | — | open 321 | **0** | 747 | all three |
+| 900×600 | 200 | closed | 700 | 747 | New Smart Playlist |
+| **800×600** | 56 | closed | 744 | 747 | **New Smart Playlist (158/162px)** |
+| 320×600 | — | closed | 320 | 747 | all three |
+
+Five things in that table are not in the issue.
+
+**The header clips at the supported minimum with the queue closed.**
+At 800×600 — the size `backend/config/window.go` enforces and the only
+size this app *promises* — "New Smart Playlist" loses 4px of its 162.
+#24 reads as a queue-panel bug; the queue makes it dramatic, but the
+header overflows on its own at the minimum window.
+
+**900×600 is worse than 800×600, because the sidebar expands at 900.**
+`AUTO_COLLAPSE_VIEWPORT` collapses the sidebar to icons *below* 900, so
+at 899px the main panel is 843px and at 900px it is 700px. The worst
+desktop case is therefore not the minimum window; it is the pixel
+immediately above the collapse. Anything that tests "the minimum" and
+stops has not tested the worst case, which is what
+`layout-overflow.spec.ts` does today.
+
+**At phone widths the queue is not a drawer, it is an amputation.**
+`queue-panel`'s host is `flex-shrink: 0; width: 0`, going to
+`width: var(--queue-width, 320px)` under `[open]` — it is *in the flow*
+of `.content-area`, so it takes its width from the main panel rather
+than covering it. At 390px that leaves 69px of the page; at 320px it
+leaves **0px**, and the app is not degraded but gone. This is the
+measurement #55 needs and did not have.
+
+**Only Playlists overflows.** Sweeping all ten primary views at 900×600
+and at 390×780, every other header reports `scrollWidth ==
+clientWidth`, and Albums at 390px renders title, count and sort
+legibly (checked on a screenshot, not just the number). #69 is
+therefore one view's action set — three text buttons totalling 390px —
+and not a systemic header failure, though the *rule* still belongs in
+`page-header`.
+
+**Both reasons in `MinWidth`'s comment are stale.** It says the floor is
+800×600 because "below ~780 the header's subtitle wraps" and "below
+~600 tall the eleven sidebar items no longer fit". The subtitle is
+`display: none` below 900 (index.css), and the sidebar host is
+`overflow-y: auto` — at 600×460 its `scrollHeight` is 434 against a
+332px client, and Settings is reachable after scrolling. Neither
+mechanism can happen any more. That does not mean the floor should
+move; it means its stated reason no longer supports it, which is worse
+than either answer.
+
+*(Care needed: my first probe for the sidebar scroller searched
+`shadowRoot.querySelectorAll('*')` and reported "items are
+unreachable", because the scroller is the **host** and a host is not in
+its own shadow root. The claim in CLAUDE.md is correct.)*
+
+---
+
+## Decision 1 — the supported size matrix
+
+Three bands. Two of them already exist and are already argued; what is
+new is that they are written down as a *promise*, and that the queue is
+part of it.
+
+| band | width | navigation | queue | promise |
+|---|---|---|---|---|
+| **Phone** | < 600 | `bottom-nav` + drawer | overlay, full width | reflows; nothing needs sideways scrolling; fits 320px |
+| **Compact** | 600 – 899 | icon sidebar | overlay + scrim | nothing is clipped or unreachable at any width in the band |
+| **Desktop** | ≥ 900 | labelled sidebar | inline where it fits (see decision 2), else overlay | as Compact |
+
+And one promise across all three: **no action is ever unreachable.**
+That is the sentence #69 asks for and it is the one the matrix exists
+to make checkable.
+
+**400% zoom** keeps the meaning it already has: WCAG 1.4.10 names 320px
+as the reflow target, the phone band covers it, and
+`layout-overflow.spec.ts` already asserts a 320px viewport needs no
+sideways scrolling. What changes is that the *queue* must be part of
+that assertion — it is not today, and with the queue open at 320px the
+main panel is 0px wide, which no current test can see.
+
+**The window minimum stays 800×600**, and its comment gets the real
+reason. The old mechanisms are gone, but the floor is still where the
+Compact band's chrome stops being comfortable, and lowering it would
+mean promising the desktop layout at sizes where only the phone layout
+works. The interesting consequence is decision 4.
+
+---
+
+## Decision 2 — the queue is an overlay when it cannot afford to be a column
+
+**The rule.** The queue panel renders inline — in the flow, as today —
+only while
+
+```
+viewport − sidebar − queueWidth ≥ 480
+```
+
+and as an overlay with a scrim otherwise.
+
+**Why it cannot be a media query**, which is the load-bearing half:
+the queue's width is *user state*. It is drag-resizable between 200 and
+500px and persisted (`--queue-width`, `MIN_WIDTH`/`MAX_WIDTH` in
+`queue-panel.ts`). A breakpoint at a fixed viewport width silently
+assumes the default 320, and is wrong by 180px for a user who has
+dragged the panel wide — in the direction that hurts, since a wider
+queue is exactly when the content can least afford it. So the mode is
+computed from the measured widths and published as an attribute, the
+way `data-active-view` already is, and the CSS keys off that.
+
+**Why 480, honestly.** There is no cliff to derive it from. The track
+list rescales its columns continuously — at main widths from 900 down
+to 544 its `--grid-cols` shrink from 213px to 124px with
+`rowOverflow=0` throughout — and the album grid steps 3 columns to 2
+somewhere between 564 and 644 without breaking. So this is a judgement,
+anchored on two things: it keeps the *default* window (1100 wide, main
+= 580) inline, because the inline queue is a desktop affordance people
+choose and turning it into an overlay for the common case would be a
+regression in feel; and it puts every case measured as broken —
+900×600 at main=379, and every phone width — on the overlay side.
+1024×768 lands at main=504 and stays inline.
+
+**The scrim is the other half of the issue's complaint** ("make the
+queue obviously an overlay *over* the content so it reads as something
+to close"). An overlay queue gets a scrim, closes on scrim click and on
+Escape, and returns focus to `#queue-button`.
+
+**What must not change**: #55's Direction is explicit — one component,
+two mount points, do not fork it. The overlay is a *presentation* of
+the same `queue-panel`, so the roving tab stop, Alt+Arrow reorder, drag
+reorder, selection semantics and the `virtualizer.requestUpdate()` on
+selection and current-track change all come along untouched. This
+decision deliberately stops short of #55's detail-view mount, but it is
+the shape that makes it possible, and it unblocks it.
+
+---
+
+## Decision 3 — #69 is its own PR, and here is the finding that decides it
+
+`page-header` **cannot collapse its own actions**, and that is not an
+effort estimate but a fact about the API. Actions arrive through
+`<slot name="actions">` as arbitrary light-DOM markup — Playlists slots
+a `<div class="header-actions">` of three `<button>`s with click
+handlers, drag handlers and a conditional class. A component cannot
+move another component's light-DOM children into a dropdown and keep
+their behaviour; there is nothing generic to render as a menu item.
+
+So the overflow rule needs an *actions API* — hosts declaring
+`{icon, label, handler, priority}` data that `page-header` can render
+either as buttons or as menu items — which is a change to all three
+hosts that slot actions, not a rule added in one place. That is a
+different piece of work from this one, it is independently verifiable,
+and the desktop half of #69's symptom is removed by decision 2 anyway
+(the queue stops eating the header's width).
+
+It therefore stays #69, gets the finding above recorded on it, and
+follows immediately after this. What *this* plan owes it is the
+promise in the matrix — no action unreachable at any supported size —
+and the measurement that the only offender today is Playlists.
+
+**And the promise is not kept yet, which is the honest version of a
+claim this document made in its first draft.** "Decision 2 removes the
+desktop half of #69's symptom" was too strong. Measured after phase 2,
+at 900×600 on Playlists:
+
+| | before | after |
+|---|---|---|
+| queue open | main 379px, **all three** actions clipped | main 700px, **one** clipped |
+| queue closed | main 700px, one clipped | unchanged |
+
+So the queue's *contribution* is gone — open and closed are now
+identical, which is the whole of what this decision owed — and the
+residual "New Smart Playlist: 114/162px" is the header overflowing on
+its own, at a size the queue never touched. #69 is still a live defect
+at a supported size, and the matrix's promise is what will close it.
+
+---
+
+## Decision 4 — a very small window becomes the phone layout, not the mini-player
+
+#24 asks whether a very small window should switch to the mini-player
+(#12) "or simply refuse to go there". Both options in the question are
+worse than the one the codebase already has.
+
+**#12 is a second window, not a mode.** Its findings say so: v3
+supports multiple windows, `AlwaysOnTop` is a window *option*, and the
+frontend would need an entry branch mounting only the mini-player root
+for a second window loading the same bundle. Turning the main window
+into a mini-player at some width conflates the two: it would throw away
+the user's navigation state on a resize, and it puts the MPRIS question
+(#12's own open question — media controls are process-level and must
+not be per-window) on a code path that a drag can trigger by accident.
+
+**And "refuses" is unnecessary, because the reflow already exists.**
+The phone band is real, tested, and reached by width alone — a desktop
+window narrowed below 600px already gets `bottom-nav` and the phone
+shell. That is a better answer than refusing: it is strictly more
+usable than a hard minimum, it costs nothing new, and it is the same
+code Android runs, so it stays exercised.
+
+So: the main window reflows and never becomes a mini-player; #12 stays
+a separate always-on-top window and is not blocked by, or coupled to,
+this decision. The window minimum stays 800×600 for the reason in
+decision 1 — but the phone band is what happens below it, not a
+refusal, which is why the minimum is a comfort floor rather than a
+correctness one.
+
+---
+
+## Phases
+
+1. **This document**, linked from #24, with the matrix reported on the
+   issue and #55 told whether it is unblocked. *(no code)* — **done**
+2. **The queue's overlay mode** — computed mode attribute, scrim,
+   Escape and scrim-click close, focus return. The inline path is
+   unchanged above the threshold. — **done**
+3. **The window minimum's comment** — replace both stale reasons with
+   the measured ones. No value change. — **done**
+4. **Verification**, below. Including the specs that must change
+   because they assert the old behaviour. — **done**
+
+#69 follows as its own branch; #55 became unblocked at phase 2.
+
+## What landed, measured
+
+Main panel width with the queue open, before and after:
+
+| viewport | before | after | mode |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| 1280×800 | 759 | 759 | inline |
+| 1100×720 (default window) | 579 | 579 | inline |
+| 1024×768 | 503 | 503 | inline |
+| 900×600 | **379** | **700** | overlay |
+| 800×600 | 423 | 744 | overlay |
+| 390×780 | **69** | **390** | overlay |
+| 320×600 | **0** | **320** | overlay |
+
+The scrim is perceptible but subtle on a dark ramp, which is worth
+knowing before someone "fixes" it: sampled from the screenshots at
+900×600, the main panel's background goes 33,37,41 → 18,20,23 and a
+row's text 242 → 133. It covers the **content area only** — not the
+sidebar or the transport — on purpose: the queue is not modal, and
+leaving the navigation live means the scrim reads as "this is over the
+content" (which is what #24 asked for) without pretending the rest of
+the app is unavailable.
+
+## Verification, and what each tier cannot see
+
+- `make ui-test` — the queue panel's mode logic is component-tier
+  work and belongs there. It **cannot** see the shell: the threshold is
+  computed from the sidebar and viewport, which do not exist in that
+  tier.
+- `make e2e` — `layout-overflow.spec.ts` gains the queue-open case at
+  every band (it has none today, which is why main=0px at 320px has
+  never failed anything) and **gains 900×600**, since the minimum is
+  not the worst case. `queue-toggle-state.spec.ts` and
+  `phone-shell.spec.ts` both touch the panel and must be re-read before
+  editing.
+- **Screenshots at every band, read by a human.** This is not optional
+  here: `layout-overflow.spec.ts` asserts the *shell* needs no sideways
+  scrolling and passes on a build whose album header clips its own
+  buttons (measured this session at 390px; filed on #66). Clipping
+  *inside* a component is invisible to it, and clipping is this issue.
+- `make ui-visual` **cannot help at all** — the component tier renders
+  the token fallbacks, because the theme only reaches `:root` in the
+  real app.
+- Accessible names via `page.getByRole(...)`, never a shadow-root
+  query. A drawer with a scrim is exactly the shape that grows a
+  nameless control, and this repo has shipped one three times.

CLAUDE.md

@@ -1328,6 +1328,68 @@ is 32px each. Which four is plan 016's committed subset, and everything
 else — Settings included, because a phone still needs it — is behind
 "More".
 
+**There are three supported size bands, and the queue is part of the
+promise.** Plan 018 (#24) wrote them down: **Phone** below 600 (bottom
+nav, reflows, fits 320px exactly), **Compact** 600–899 (icon sidebar),
+**Desktop** from 900 (labelled sidebar) — plus one sentence across all
+three, *no action is ever unreachable at any supported size*. The bands
+themselves already existed; what was new is that they are a promise and
+that the queue panel is inside it.
+
+**900 is the worst desktop width, not the 800×600 minimum.** The
+sidebar collapses to icons *below* 900, so the main panel is 843px at
+899 and 700px at 900 — the narrowest content area any desktop width
+produces is at the top of the Compact band, not at the enforced floor.
+Every viewport list that stopped at "the minimum" was therefore missing
+its own worst case, which is why `layout-overflow.spec.ts` carries 900
+now. And **both reasons in `MinWidth`'s comment had expired** — the
+subtitle is `display: none` from 899 down and the sidebar host scrolls
+(`overflow-y: auto`; at 600×460 its `scrollHeight` is 434 against a
+332px client) — so 800×600 is a *comfort* floor for desktop chrome and
+not a correctness one. Below it the phone layout takes over, which is
+also why a very small window reflows rather than becoming a
+mini-player: **#12 is a second always-on-top window, not a mode of this
+one**, and making it a mode would discard navigation state on a resize
+and put the process-level MPRIS question on a path a drag can trigger.
+
+**The queue panel is a column only while the content can spare the
+width, and that cannot be a media query.** In flow the host is
+`flex-shrink: 0`, so an open queue is paid for by the main panel: it
+left 379px at 900×600 (with all three of the Playlists header's actions
+clipped), 69px at 390, and **0px** at 320 — the content was not
+degraded but gone. It goes to an overlay with a scrim when
+`available - panelWidth < 480`, where `available` is
+`.content-area`'s width and therefore already accounts for the
+sidebar's collapse.
+
+Four things about it are load-bearing. **The mode is computed, not
+breakpointed**, because the panel's width is user state — drag-resizable
+200–500px and persisted — so a viewport breakpoint silently assumes the
+default 320 and is wrong by up to 180px in the direction that hurts;
+widening the panel at a fixed window size must flip it, and
+`queue-overlay-mode.test.ts` is written around exactly that. **480 is a
+judgement and says so**: there is no cliff to derive it from (the track
+list rescales continuously, 213px to 124px columns with no row
+overflow), so it is anchored to keep the default 1100px window inline
+and put every measured-broken case on the overlay side. **The scrim
+covers the content area only** — not the sidebar or the transport —
+because the queue is not modal, and it is subtle on a dark ramp by
+arithmetic rather than by accident (33,37,41 → 18,20,23). And **the
+overlay is a presentation, not a fork**: #55 asks for one component
+with two mount points, so the roving tab stop, Alt+Arrow reorder, drag
+reorder, selection semantics and `virtualizer.requestUpdate()` all come
+along untouched. Escape closes it and returns focus, and is attached
+only while the overlay is up — it is a dismissal, not a shortcut, which
+is why it is not a panel-scoped binding.
+
+What this does **not** fix is `page-header` overflowing on its own:
+at 900×600 "New Smart Playlist" is still clipped to 114 of 162px with
+the queue *closed*. That is #69, and it cannot be fixed in
+`page-header` alone — actions arrive through `<slot name="actions">` as
+arbitrary light-DOM markup with their own handlers, so collapsing them
+into a "More actions" menu needs an actions *API* (data, not markup)
+across all three hosts that slot them.
+
 **The phone section of `index.css` is last on purpose.** A media query
 adds no specificity, so a `@media (max-width: 599px)` block placed
 above the plain rules it overrides loses to them — which is how phase 1

backend/config/window.go

@@ -13,13 +13,31 @@ const (
 	// enforces this at runtime; it is also the floor below which a
 	// reported size is treated as bogus and not persisted.
 	//
-	// 800x600 is where the shell was measured to still work, rather
-	// than a round number: below ~780 the header's subtitle wraps and
-	// pushes the title out of the 4em top bar, and below ~600 tall the
-	// eleven sidebar items no longer fit at once.  The previous
-	// 512x384 was aspirational — at 700x480 the sidebar overflowed
-	// behind the player bar with no scroll and Settings and Jobs could
-	// not be reached at all.
+	// **Both reasons this comment used to give have expired**, and the
+	// value is right for a third one.  It said the floor was 800x600
+	// because "below ~780 the header's subtitle wraps and pushes the
+	// title out of the 4em top bar" and "below ~600 tall the eleven
+	// sidebar items no longer fit at once".  Neither mechanism can
+	// happen now: the subtitle is display:none from 899px down
+	// (index.css), and the sidebar host is overflow-y:auto — measured
+	// at 600x460, its scrollHeight is 434 against a 332px client and
+	// Settings is reachable after scrolling.  A floor defended by two
+	// mechanisms that no longer exist is a number nobody can argue
+	// with, which is worse than either answer.
+	//
+	// It stays 800x600 because that is where the *desktop* chrome
+	// stops being comfortable — the Compact band of plan 018's size
+	// matrix (#24) — and not because the app breaks below it.  It does
+	// not: under 600px wide the phone layout takes over (bottom-nav,
+	// no sidebar) and the shell fits 320px exactly, which is what
+	// makes this a comfort floor rather than a correctness one, and
+	// why a very small window reflows instead of becoming a
+	// mini-player (#12 is a second always-on-top window, not a mode of
+	// this one).
+	//
+	// The previous 512x384 was aspirational — at 700x480 the sidebar
+	// overflowed behind the player bar with no scroll and Settings and
+	// Jobs could not be reached at all.
 	MinWidth = 800
 	// MinHeight is the smallest allowed window height in pixels.
 	MinHeight = 600

e2e/specs/layout-overflow.spec.ts

@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ const MIN_VIEWPORT = { width: 800, height: 600 };
 const VIEWPORTS = [
   { name: '1440×900', width: 1440, height: 900 },
   { name: '1024×768', width: 1024, height: 768 },
+  // Not the minimum, and that is the point (#24). The sidebar collapses
+  // to icons *below* 900, so the main panel is 843px at 899 and 700px
+  // at 900 — the narrowest content area any desktop width produces is
+  // here, not at the enforced floor. A list that stopped at the minimum
+  // was missing its own worst case.
+  { name: '900×600 (the widest sidebar, so the narrowest content)', width: 900, height: 600 },
   { name: `the minimum (${MIN_VIEWPORT.width}×${MIN_VIEWPORT.height})`, ...MIN_VIEWPORT },
 ];
 

e2e/specs/queue-overlay.spec.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+import { test, expect } from '../support/fixtures.js';
+
+/**
+ * #24 — the queue panel does not take the page's width away from it.
+ *
+ * The panel is `flex-shrink: 0` in the flow of `.content-area`, so an
+ * open queue used to be paid for by the main panel. Measured on
+ * Playlists before the fix:
+ *
+ * | viewport | main panel |
+ * |---|---|
+ * | 900×600 | 379px — all three header actions clipped |
+ * | 390×780 | 69px |
+ * | 320×600 | **0px** |
+ *
+ * **900×600 is the worst desktop case, not the 800×600 minimum**, and
+ * that is the trap this file exists to keep closed: the sidebar
+ * collapses to icons *below* 900, so the main panel is 843px at 899 and
+ * 700px at 900. A spec that checks "the minimum" and stops has not
+ * checked the worst case — which is what every viewport list in this
+ * suite did before this.
+ *
+ * These assert the *content's* width rather than the panel's mode
+ * wherever they can, because the mode is the mechanism and the width is
+ * the complaint.
+ */
+
+/** The bands from plan 018's size matrix, plus the pixel above the collapse. */
+const BANDS = [
+  { name: 'a wide desktop (1280×800)', width: 1280, height: 800, inline: true },
+  { name: 'the default window (1100×720)', width: 1100, height: 720, inline: true },
+  { name: 'a laptop (1024×768)', width: 1024, height: 768, inline: true },
+  { name: 'the worst desktop width (900×600)', width: 900, height: 600, inline: false },
+  { name: 'the enforced minimum (800×600)', width: 800, height: 600, inline: false },
+  { name: 'a phone (390×780)', width: 390, height: 780, inline: false },
+  { name: '400% zoom (320×600)', width: 320, height: 600, inline: false },
+];
+
+/**
+ * How much room the content has, and whether the shell needs scrolling
+ * to reach any of itself.
+ */
+const shellGeometry = (page: import('@playwright/test').Page) =>
+  page.evaluate(() => {
+    const main = document.querySelector('#main-content')!.getBoundingClientRect();
+    const panel = document.querySelector('#queue-panel')!;
+
+    return {
+      mainWidth: Math.round(main.width),
+      overlay: panel.hasAttribute('overlay'),
+      open: panel.hasAttribute('open'),
+      bodyScrollWidth: document.body.scrollWidth,
+      bodyClientWidth: document.body.clientWidth,
+    };
+  });
+
+async function openQueue(page: import('@playwright/test').Page) {
+  const toggle = page.locator('#queue-button');
+
+  if ((await toggle.getAttribute('aria-expanded')) !== 'true') {
+    await toggle.click();
+  }
+
+  await expect(toggle).toHaveAttribute('aria-expanded', 'true');
+}
+
+test.describe('an open queue leaves the content its width', () => {
+  for (const band of BANDS) {
+    test(`at ${band.name}`, async ({ app }) => {
+      await app.setViewportSize({ width: band.width, height: band.height });
+      await openQueue(app);
+
+      // The mode is settled by a ResizeObserver, so poll rather than
+      // read once: a single read races the resize and reports the
+      // previous viewport's answer.
+      await expect
+        .poll(async () => (await shellGeometry(app)).overlay)
+        .toBe(!band.inline);
+
+      const geo = await shellGeometry(app);
+
+      // The floor is the point of the whole issue. Inline, the queue is
+      // affordable and the content keeps the rest; as an overlay the
+      // content keeps *everything*, which is what makes 0px at 320
+      // impossible rather than merely unlikely.
+      expect(geo.mainWidth).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(320);
+
+      if (!band.inline) {
+        expect(geo.mainWidth).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(
+          Math.min(band.width, 320),
+        );
+      }
+
+      // And opening the queue must not make the shell overflow.
+      expect(geo.bodyScrollWidth).toBeLessThanOrEqual(geo.bodyClientWidth);
+    });
+  }
+});
+
+test.describe('an overlaid queue says it is over the content', () => {
+  test.beforeEach(async ({ app }) => {
+    await app.setViewportSize({ width: 900, height: 600 });
+  });
+
+  test('draws a scrim and closes when it is clicked', async ({ app }) => {
+    await openQueue(app);
+
+    const panel = app.locator('#queue-panel');
+
+    await expect(panel).toHaveAttribute('overlay', '');
+
+    // The scrim is `aria-hidden` on purpose — it is a dismissal target,
+    // and the named routes out are the close button and Escape — so it
+    // is located structurally rather than by role.
+    await panel.evaluate((el) =>
+      el.shadowRoot!.querySelector<HTMLElement>('.scrim')!.click(),
+    );
+
+    await expect(app.locator('#queue-button')).toHaveAttribute(
+      'aria-expanded',
+      'false',
+    );
+  });
+
+  /**
+   * `getByRole`, not a shadow-root query: this repo has shipped a
+   * nameless control three times, and a drawer with a scrim is exactly
+   * the shape that grows a fourth.
+   */
+  test('offers a named close button', async ({ app }) => {
+    await openQueue(app);
+
+    const close = app.getByRole('button', { name: 'Close queue' });
+
+    await expect(close).toBeVisible();
+    await close.click();
+
+    await expect(app.locator('#queue-button')).toHaveAttribute(
+      'aria-expanded',
+      'false',
+    );
+  });
+
+  test('closes on Escape and gives focus back to the toggle', async ({
+    app,
+  }) => {
+    const toggle = app.locator('#queue-button');
+
+    await toggle.focus();
+    await toggle.click();
+    await expect(toggle).toHaveAttribute('aria-expanded', 'true');
+
+    await app.keyboard.press('Escape');
+
+    await expect(toggle).toHaveAttribute('aria-expanded', 'false');
+    await expect(toggle).toBeFocused();
+  });
+});
+
+/**
+ * The inline panel is the mode that already worked, and the one every
+ * other queue spec is written against. It keeps its resize handle and
+ * gains none of the overlay's chrome.
+ */
+test.describe('a wide window keeps the queue beside the content', () => {
+  test('no scrim, no close button, and the content is narrower', async ({
+    app,
+  }) => {
+    await app.setViewportSize({ width: 1280, height: 800 });
+
+    const widthWithoutQueue = (await shellGeometry(app)).mainWidth;
+
+    await openQueue(app);
+
+    await expect(app.locator('#queue-panel')).not.toHaveAttribute(
+      'overlay',
+      '',
+    );
+
+    const geo = await shellGeometry(app);
+
+    expect(geo.mainWidth).toBeLessThan(widthWithoutQueue);
+    await expect(
+      app.getByRole('button', { name: 'Close queue' }),
+    ).toHaveCount(0);
+  });
+});

frontend/index.css

@@ -231,6 +231,14 @@ body div.sidebar {
     display: flex;
     overflow: hidden;
     contain: layout style;
+
+    /* The containing block for the queue panel's overlay mode (plan
+       018, #24), which spans this box rather than taking width from
+       the main panel beside it. `contain: layout` already establishes
+       one; this says so on purpose, so that removing the containment
+       for a paint reason does not silently reparent the overlay to the
+       viewport. */
+    position: relative;
 }
 
 .main-panel {

frontend/src/components/queue-panel/queue-panel.ts

@@ -72,6 +72,24 @@ const MIN_WIDTH = 200;
 const MAX_WIDTH = 500;
 const DEFAULT_WIDTH = 320;
 
+/**
+ * The narrowest main panel the queue is allowed to leave behind before
+ * it stops being a column and becomes an overlay (plan 018, issue #24).
+ *
+ * There is no cliff to derive this from, and pretending otherwise would
+ * be the more dishonest answer: the track list rescales its columns
+ * continuously (213px down to 124px between main widths of 900 and 544,
+ * with no row overflow at any of them) and the album grid steps 3
+ * columns to 2 without breaking. So this is a judgement, anchored at
+ * both ends — it keeps the *default* 1100px window inline, because an
+ * inline queue is a desktop affordance people choose and demoting the
+ * common case to an overlay would be a regression in feel; and it puts
+ * every case measured as broken on the overlay side, which is 900x600
+ * (main = 379px, where all three of the Playlists header's actions are
+ * clipped) and every phone width (main = 69px at 390, 0px at 320).
+ */
+const MAIN_PANEL_FLOOR = 480;
+
 @customElement('queue-panel')
 export class QueuePanel
     extends LitElement
@@ -85,6 +103,22 @@ export class QueuePanel
     @property({ type: Boolean, reflect: true })
     open = false;
 
+    /**
+     * Whether the panel is covering the content instead of sitting
+     * beside it. **Computed, never set by a caller** — it is reflected
+     * so the stylesheet and a spec can both read it.
+     *
+     * It is deliberately *not* a media query, which is the whole reason
+     * this is a property and not a `@media` block. The panel's width is
+     * user state: drag-resizable between MIN_WIDTH and MAX_WIDTH and
+     * persisted. A breakpoint at a fixed viewport width silently
+     * assumes the default 320, so it is wrong by up to 180px for a user
+     * who has widened the panel — in the direction that hurts, since a
+     * wider queue is exactly when the content can least afford it.
+     */
+    @property({ type: Boolean, reflect: true })
+    overlay = false;
+
     @state()
     private isDragging = false;
 
@@ -190,6 +224,19 @@ export class QueuePanel
     private panelWidth = DEFAULT_WIDTH;
     private scrollbarDragging = false;
 
+    /** Watches `.content-area`, which is the viewport minus the sidebar. */
+    private spaceObserver?: ResizeObserver;
+
+    /**
+     * What had focus when the overlay opened, so Escape and the scrim
+     * can give it back. Focus is only taken back if the panel had it —
+     * the same rule `MenuKeyboard` follows, for the same reason: the
+     * queue can also be closed by the button in the bottom bar, and
+     * yanking focus away from wherever the user actually is would be
+     * worse than leaving it.
+     */
+    private overlayOpener: HTMLElement | null = null;
+
     // _itemSize is an internal property applied via Object.assign in BaseLayout's
     // config setter. Setting it to match the actual fixed .track-item height (49px)
     // prevents lit-virtualizer's scroll error correction from fighting the native
@@ -265,6 +312,86 @@ export class QueuePanel
             border-left: 1px solid var(--yj-border-subtle, #333);
         }
 
+        /* ---------------------------------------------------------
+           Overlay mode (plan 018, #24).
+
+           In flow the panel takes its width *from the main panel*,
+           which is the reported bug: at 900x600 that left 379px and
+           clipped every action in the Playlists header, and at 320px
+           it left 0px — the content was not degraded but gone.
+
+           Here the host spans the whole content area instead and
+           stops being a layout participant, so the main panel keeps
+           its full width and the queue sits over it. The host itself
+           is transparent and click-through; the scrim and the panel
+           are what take pointer events. The containment drops paint,
+           which would otherwise clip the panel's own shadow.
+           --------------------------------------------------------- */
+        :host([overlay]) {
+            position: absolute;
+            inset: 0;
+            width: auto;
+            background-color: transparent;
+            overflow: visible;
+            pointer-events: none;
+            contain: layout style;
+            z-index: 20;
+        }
+
+        /* Closed, an overlay is not there at all. In flow the panel is
+           width: 0, which is its own way of saying this; absolutely
+           positioned there is no width to collapse. */
+        :host([overlay]:not([open])) {
+            display: none;
+        }
+
+        :host([overlay][open]) {
+            border-left: none;
+        }
+
+        :host([overlay]) .panel-content {
+            position: absolute;
+            top: 0;
+            right: 0;
+            bottom: 0;
+            width: var(--queue-width, ${unsafeCSS(DEFAULT_WIDTH)}px);
+            max-width: 100%;
+            box-sizing: border-box;
+            background-color: var(--yj-bg-surface, #212529);
+            border-left: 1px solid var(--yj-border-subtle, #333);
+            box-shadow: -8px 0 24px rgb(0 0 0 / 45%);
+            pointer-events: auto;
+        }
+
+        /* Dragging the edge of something that is already covering the
+           content answers a question nobody asked, and it is a
+           mouse-only affordance either way. */
+        :host([overlay]) .resize-handle {
+            display: none;
+        }
+
+        .scrim {
+            position: absolute;
+            inset: 0;
+            background-color: rgb(0 0 0 / 45%);
+            pointer-events: auto;
+            border: none;
+            padding: 0;
+            margin: 0;
+            cursor: pointer;
+        }
+
+        /* The phone gets the whole width: below 600 there is no
+           "beside" left to be, and this is the shape #55 turns into a
+           real screen. A media query inside a shadow root is answered
+           by the viewport, so the component states this itself rather
+           than the shell reaching in. */
+        @media (max-width: 599px) {
+            :host([overlay]) .panel-content {
+                width: 100%;
+            }
+        }
+
         .resize-handle {
             position: absolute;
             top: 0;
@@ -656,6 +783,20 @@ export class QueuePanel
             '--queue-width',
             `${this.panelWidth}px`,
         );
+
+        // The mode is a measurement, so it is observed rather than
+        // computed once: the parent is `.content-area`, whose width is
+        // the viewport minus the sidebar — including the sidebar's own
+        // collapse at 900px, which is what makes 900 the *worst*
+        // desktop width rather than the minimum.
+        this.updateOverlayMode();
+
+        if (this.parentElement) {
+            this.spaceObserver = new ResizeObserver(() =>
+                this.updateOverlayMode(),
+            );
+            this.spaceObserver.observe(this.parentElement);
+        }
         document.addEventListener(
             'mousemove',
             this.handleMouseMove,
@@ -690,6 +831,9 @@ export class QueuePanel
         super.disconnectedCallback();
         this.creditsUnsub?.();
         this.creditsUnsub = undefined;
+        this.spaceObserver?.disconnect();
+        this.spaceObserver = undefined;
+        document.removeEventListener('keydown', this.onOverlayKeydown);
         document.removeEventListener(
             'mousemove',
             this.handleMouseMove,
@@ -736,7 +880,79 @@ export class QueuePanel
         this.delegationAttached = false;
     }
 
+    /**
+     * Decide whether the queue can afford to be a column.
+     *
+     * The parent is `.content-area`, so its width is the viewport minus
+     * the sidebar and the sum already accounts for the sidebar's own
+     * collapse. It is stable across the panel's own open/closed state
+     * in both modes — in flow the panel is a child of that box, and as
+     * an overlay it is out of flow — so this cannot oscillate.
+     */
+    private updateOverlayMode = () => {
+        const available = this.parentElement?.clientWidth ?? 0;
+
+        // Before layout there is nothing to measure, and answering 0 by
+        // flipping to overlay would show the scrim for a frame.
+        if (available === 0) return;
+
+        this.overlay = available - this.panelWidth < MAIN_PANEL_FLOOR;
+    };
+
+    /**
+     * Escape closes a scrimmed overlay, which is the one keyboard rule
+     * every dialog in this app already follows.
+     *
+     * It is a document listener rather than a panel-scoped binding
+     * (`services/shortcut-scope.ts`) because it is not a *shortcut*: it
+     * is the dismissal of something covering the page, and it has to
+     * work while focus is still behind the scrim. It is attached only
+     * while the overlay is actually up and removed on close, so it is
+     * scoped to a state rather than being a permanent global. Nothing
+     * else binds Escape — the shortcut service only uses it to blur a
+     * text input.
+     */
+    private onOverlayKeydown = (e: KeyboardEvent) => {
+        if (e.key !== 'Escape' || !this.open || !this.overlay) return;
+
+        e.stopPropagation();
+        this.closeFromOverlay();
+    };
+
+    private closeFromOverlay = () => {
+        const hadFocus = this.contains(
+            document.activeElement as Node | null,
+        );
+
+        this.open = false;
+
+        if (hadFocus) {
+            const back =
+                this.overlayOpener ??
+                document.getElementById('queue-button');
+
+            back?.focus();
+        }
+
+        this.overlayOpener = null;
+    };
+
     override updated() {
+        // The overlay owns Escape only while it is up.
+        if (this.open && this.overlay) {
+            document.addEventListener('keydown', this.onOverlayKeydown);
+
+            this.overlayOpener ??=
+                document.activeElement instanceof HTMLElement &&
+                document.activeElement !== document.body
+                    ? document.activeElement
+                    : null;
+        } else {
+            document.removeEventListener('keydown', this.onOverlayKeydown);
+
+            if (!this.open) this.overlayOpener = null;
+        }
+
         // Closed, the panel is `width: 0` — which hides it from the eye
         // and from nobody else: its Clear and Add buttons still took tab
         // stops at x=1440 and were still read out (H-5).  `inert` is the
@@ -1631,6 +1847,11 @@ export class QueuePanel
             '--queue-width',
             `${clampedWidth}px`,
         );
+
+        // Widening the panel is one of the two ways the content can run
+        // out of room, and it is the way a viewport-width media query
+        // cannot see at all.
+        this.updateOverlayMode();
     };
 
     private handleMouseUp = () => {
@@ -1714,6 +1935,15 @@ export class QueuePanel
         const tracks = this.queue.tracks;
 
         return html`
+            ${this.overlay
+                ? html`<div
+                      class="scrim"
+                      part="scrim"
+                      data-testid="queue-scrim"
+                      aria-hidden="true"
+                      @click=${this.closeFromOverlay}
+                  ></div>`
+                : nothing}
             <div class="panel-content">
                 <div
                     class="resize-handle ${this.isDragging
@@ -1763,6 +1993,16 @@ export class QueuePanel
                                 name=${ICON_PLAYLIST}
                             ></wa-icon>
                         </button>
+                        ${this.overlay
+                            ? html`<button
+                                  class="header-action-button"
+                                  data-testid="queue-close"
+                                  aria-label="Close queue"
+                                  @click=${this.closeFromOverlay}
+                              >
+                                  <wa-icon name="xmark"></wa-icon>
+                              </button>`
+                            : nothing}
                     </div>
                 </div>
 

frontend/test/components/queue-overlay-mode.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+/**
+ * #24 — the queue stops being a column when it cannot afford to be one.
+ *
+ * In flow the panel is `flex-shrink: 0`, so it takes its width *from
+ * the main panel* rather than covering it. Measured against the running
+ * app on the Playlists page, that left 379px of content at 900×600 —
+ * with all three of the page header's actions clipped — 69px at 390px
+ * wide, and **0px** at 320px, where the content was not degraded but
+ * gone.
+ *
+ * The rule is `available - panelWidth >= MAIN_PANEL_FLOOR`, and the
+ * reason it is a computed property rather than a `@media` block is the
+ * third test here: the panel's width is user state, drag-resizable
+ * between 200 and 500px and persisted, so a breakpoint on the viewport
+ * alone is wrong by up to 180px for a user who has widened it — in the
+ * direction that hurts, since a wider queue is exactly when the content
+ * can least afford it.
+ *
+ * The parent is `.content-area`, i.e. the viewport minus the sidebar,
+ * which is why these mount into a sized wrapper rather than into
+ * `document.body`: the width that decides this is the *parent's*, and
+ * `fixture()` would hand the panel the whole test window.
+ */
+import { describe, expect, it, afterEach } from 'vitest';
+
+import '@components/queue-panel/queue-panel';
+import type { QueuePanel } from '@components/queue-panel/queue-panel';
+import { shadow } from '@test/support/render';
+
+const wrappers: HTMLElement[] = [];
+
+afterEach(() => {
+  for (const w of wrappers.splice(0)) w.remove();
+});
+
+/**
+ * Mount a panel inside a parent of a stated width.
+ *
+ * The wrapper is `position: relative` and `display: flex` because that
+ * is what `.content-area` is; the mode is measured from
+ * `parentElement.clientWidth`, so a wrapper that collapses to its
+ * content would measure the panel rather than the space around it.
+ */
+async function panelIn(parentWidth: number): Promise<QueuePanel> {
+  const wrapper = document.createElement('div');
+
+  wrapper.style.cssText = `position: relative; display: flex; width: ${parentWidth}px;`;
+  document.body.append(wrapper);
+  wrappers.push(wrapper);
+
+  const el = document.createElement('queue-panel') as QueuePanel;
+
+  el.open = true;
+  wrapper.append(el);
+
+  await el.updateComplete;
+  await settle(el);
+
+  return el;
+}
+
+/**
+ * A ResizeObserver delivers on a frame, not a microtask, so the mode
+ * lands a frame after the width that decides it.
+ */
+async function settle(el: QueuePanel): Promise<void> {
+  for (let frame = 0; frame < 4; frame += 1) {
+    await new Promise((r) => {
+      requestAnimationFrame(() => r(null));
+    });
+    await el.updateComplete;
+  }
+}
+
+/** Drag the resize handle by `dx`, the way a user widens the panel. */
+async function dragHandleBy(el: QueuePanel, dx: number): Promise<void> {
+  const handle = shadow<HTMLElement>(el, '.resize-handle');
+  const startX = el.getBoundingClientRect().left;
+
+  if (!handle) throw new Error('no resize handle to drag');
+
+  handle.dispatchEvent(
+    new MouseEvent('mousedown', { clientX: startX, bubbles: true }),
+  );
+  document.dispatchEvent(
+    new MouseEvent('mousemove', { clientX: startX - dx, bubbles: true }),
+  );
+  document.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent('mouseup', { bubbles: true }));
+
+  await settle(el);
+}
+
+describe('the queue panel decides whether it can be a column', () => {
+  it('stays inline while the content can spare the width', async () => {
+    const el = await panelIn(1080);
+
+    expect(el.overlay).toBe(false);
+    expect(el.hasAttribute('overlay')).toBe(false);
+  });
+
+  it('becomes an overlay when it cannot', async () => {
+    const el = await panelIn(700);
+
+    expect(el.overlay).toBe(true);
+    expect(el.hasAttribute('overlay')).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  /**
+   * The test the media query could not have passed. The parent does not
+   * move; only the user's own panel width does.
+   */
+  it('flips to overlay when the user widens the panel, at a fixed width', async () => {
+    const el = await panelIn(880);
+
+    expect(el.overlay).toBe(false);
+
+    await dragHandleBy(el, 180);
+
+    expect(el.overlay).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it('gives an overlay a scrim and a named way out, and an inline panel neither', async () => {
+    const overlaid = await panelIn(700);
+
+    expect(shadow(overlaid, '.scrim')).toBeTruthy();
+
+    const close = shadow(overlaid, '[data-testid="queue-close"]');
+
+    expect(close?.getAttribute('aria-label')).toBe('Close queue');
+
+    const inline = await panelIn(1080);
+
+    expect(inline.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.scrim')).toBeNull();
+    expect(
+      inline.shadowRoot?.querySelector('[data-testid="queue-close"]'),
+    ).toBeNull();
+  });
+
+  it('closes on the scrim, on the close button and on Escape', async () => {
+    for (const close of [
+      (el: QueuePanel) => shadow<HTMLElement>(el, '.scrim')?.click(),
+      (el: QueuePanel) =>
+        shadow<HTMLElement>(el, '[data-testid="queue-close"]')?.click(),
+      () =>
+        document.dispatchEvent(
+          new KeyboardEvent('keydown', { key: 'Escape', bubbles: true }),
+        ),
+    ]) {
+      const el = await panelIn(700);
+
+      expect(el.open).toBe(true);
+
+      close(el);
+      await el.updateComplete;
+
+      expect(el.open).toBe(false);
+    }
+  });
+
+  /**
+   * Escape belongs to the overlay, not to the queue. An inline panel is
+   * beside the content rather than over it, so there is nothing to
+   * dismiss and the key has to reach whatever else wants it.
+   */
+  it('leaves Escape alone while inline', async () => {
+    const el = await panelIn(1080);
+
+    document.dispatchEvent(
+      new KeyboardEvent('keydown', { key: 'Escape', bubbles: true }),
+    );
+    await el.updateComplete;
+
+    expect(el.open).toBe(true);
+  });
+});