fix(ui): keep a touch-only affordance reachable, or absent

Three controls are revealed by :hover and are the only route to their
action on a device that has none. #68 hid the home card's play button on
touch, which was right because tapping the card does the same thing;
these are the opposite case, so hiding them removes the action outright
and leaving them costs the same long-press flash #68 was filed for --
they are visibility:hidden / opacity:0, so on touch they are invisible
controls that still take taps.

track-details' cover-art overlay and remove, and shortcut-capture's
reset, are always visible under `@media not all and (hover: hover)`.

The queue row's remove is the third case the report names and takes the
other treatment, because #60 has since landed: the row's context menu is
a bottom sheet carrying "Remove from Queue", so the action is one
long-press away and an always-visible X would spend part of a 424px row
on something already reachable. It is display:none outside
`(hover: hover) and (pointer: fine)` rather than visibility:hidden,
which would leave a button holding its hit area and its place in the
accessibility tree -- the trap this issue is about.

The rule is not extracted into styles/ yet: that leaves two call sites
of the always-visible form, under the four the report names.

No tier here can render as a touch device, so the tests read the parsed
stylesheet the way #68's does and say so; the touch and hover renderings
were measured against the running app in a hasTouch context instead.

Closes #137

CLAUDE.md

@@ -1462,6 +1462,32 @@ vary) wins, ours being told from theirs by **identity** rather than
 that ends the gesture is swallowed, keyed on the gesture rather than on
 a time window so the first tap on the menu it opened is not eaten too.
 
+**A control revealed by `:hover` is gated on the device having hover,
+and which way round depends on whether it is the only route to its
+action.** The gate itself is not optional: a touch long-press
+synthesises a hover state in the WebView, so every one of these flashed
+into view during the 500 ms hold above — a control appearing because
+the user was reaching for a different one. Where the action is reachable
+another way the control is **absent** on a touch device (the home card's
+play button, #68; the queue row's remove, which the row's bottom-sheet
+menu carries since #60), and that is `display: none` outside
+`(hover: hover) and (pointer: fine)` rather than `opacity: 0` or
+`visibility: hidden`, both of which leave a button holding its hit area
+and its place in the accessibility tree. Where the control is the
+**only** route it is instead always visible under
+`@media not all and (hover: hover)` — `track-details`'s cover-art
+overlay and remove, `shortcut-capture`'s reset (#137) — because hiding
+it takes the action away entirely.
+
+One thing to know before checking either: **no tier here can render as a
+touch device.** CDP's `Emulation.setEmulatedMedia` does not reach the
+component tier's iframe, and the e2e projects are Desktop Chrome and
+Desktop Safari, neither of which has touch. So
+`hover-affordance.test.ts` asserts the *parsed stylesheet* — which rule
+sits inside which media query — and says so; the regression it exists
+for is someone hoisting a rule out of its query as a tidy-up, which
+nothing on a desktop renders differently.
+
 Three lists had no focused row to open a menu *from* — the queue panel
 and both playlist detail views — and gained a roving tab stop through
 `utils/roving-rows.ts`. **`track-list` deliberately does not use it**:
@@ -2489,6 +2515,31 @@ missing half; `catalogFailed` is the only route to `unavailable` now,
 and the timer is a 60 s backstop for a genuine hang rather than the
 verdict.
 
+**On a phone that page is one scroll container, and the header is in
+it** (#66). It was built as a fixed header over a scrolling tracklist,
+which is the desktop arrangement: at the reference device's 424×439 the
+header owned **253 of the panel's 318px** and the list scrolled inside
+the 64 that were left. Below 600px the *host* is the scroller and
+`.content` stops being one, so the whole page moves together — which is
+only available because this tracklist is plain DOM rather than a
+virtualizer, and because `.main-panel > *` already gives the host a
+definite height.
+
+Three things about it are load-bearing. **Another `min-width: 0` was
+not the fix**: `.album-info` carries one and was shrinking exactly as
+asked, to 112px beside a 200px cover — so the title drew as `G…` and
+"Shuffle album" ended at x=443 inside a 424px box, clipped by the
+component's own `overflow: hidden` and reachable by no gesture. A row
+with a fixed-size sibling has to **stack** at that width, or the column
+that must shrink has nothing to be wide with. **`layout-overflow.spec.ts`
+cannot see any of this** — `body.scrollWidth` equalled the viewport
+throughout, because the overflow was *inside* a component; the spec
+measures each header control against the host's own box, which is
+`top-bar-fit.spec.ts`'s shape for the same reason. And **the phone block
+is last in the stylesheet**, on `index.css`'s rule: a media query adds
+no specificity, so written above the plain rules it overrides every
+declaration in it is silently dead.
+
 **Activating a row plays the list the row is in, from that row.** A
 double-click — and Play on a single row's context menu — queues the
 list as *displayed* with `startIndex` on that row, not a queue of one

e2e/specs/phone-album-page.spec.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+import { test, expect } from '../support/fixtures.js';
+import type { Page } from '@playwright/test';
+
+/**
+ * The album page on a phone (#66).
+ *
+ * Two faults, and neither was visible to `layout-overflow.spec.ts`:
+ * that spec asserts the *shell* needs no sideways scrolling, and the
+ * shell was correct throughout — `body.scrollWidth === clientWidth`
+ * while `explore-album-details` itself measured 443 inside a 424px box
+ * and clipped two of the album's three primary actions with its own
+ * `overflow: hidden`. So the measurement here is **per control against
+ * the component's box**, which is the same shape `top-bar-fit.spec.ts`
+ * needed for the same reason.
+ *
+ * The other half is the scroll: the page was a fixed header over a
+ * scrolling tracklist, so at the reference device's 424x439 the header
+ * owned 253 of the panel's 318px and the list scrolled in the 64 that
+ * were left. It is one scroll container below 600px, which is a
+ * property of the *host* rather than of `.content`.
+ *
+ * The engine is the caveat this tier cannot close: the reference device
+ * renders in Chrome 113 and this is Chromium/WebKit. A flex direction
+ * and a scroll container are nowhere near that engine's documented gaps
+ * (relaxed nesting, the Popover API, `light-dark()`), but "it renders
+ * at that size in Chromium" is not evidence about the phone.
+ */
+
+/** The phone this was measured on, in CSS pixels. */
+const DEVICE = { width: 424, height: 439 };
+
+const details = (page: Page) => page.locator('explore-album-details');
+
+/** The page's own boxes, read from inside its shadow root. */
+const geometry = (page: Page) =>
+  page.evaluate(() => {
+    const host = document.querySelector('explore-album-details');
+    const sr = host?.shadowRoot;
+
+    if (!host || !sr) return null;
+
+    const box = (sel: string) => {
+      const el = sr.querySelector(sel);
+
+      if (!el) return null;
+
+      const r = el.getBoundingClientRect();
+
+      return { width: Math.round(r.width), right: Math.round(r.right) };
+    };
+
+    const content = sr.querySelector('.content');
+
+    return {
+      hostWidth: host.clientWidth,
+      hostScrollWidth: host.scrollWidth,
+      // The host is the scroller below 600px, so the page is taller
+      // than its box rather than the tracklist being a window inside it.
+      hostScrolls: host.scrollHeight > host.clientHeight,
+      contentScrolls: content
+        ? content.scrollHeight > content.clientHeight
+        : null,
+      header: box('.album-header'),
+      play: box('[data-testid="album-play"]'),
+      shuffle: box('[data-testid="album-shuffle"]'),
+      queue: box('[data-testid="album-queue"]'),
+      title: (() => {
+        const el = sr.querySelector('.album-title-text');
+
+        return el ? el.scrollWidth <= el.clientWidth + 1 : null;
+      })(),
+    };
+  });
+
+test.describe('the album page on a phone', () => {
+  test.beforeEach(async ({ app }) => {
+    await app.setViewportSize(DEVICE);
+    await openFirstAlbum(app);
+  });
+
+  test.afterEach(async ({ app }) => {
+    await app.setViewportSize({ width: 1440, height: 900 });
+    await app.getByTestId('nav-tracks').click();
+  });
+
+  test('keeps every action inside its own box', async ({ app }) => {
+    const geo = await geometry(app);
+
+    expect(geo).not.toBeNull();
+    // "Shuffle album" ended at x=443 in a 424px component and could not
+    // be reached by any gesture; "Add to queue" at 440.
+    for (const action of ['play', 'shuffle', 'queue'] as const) {
+      expect(
+        geo?.[action],
+        `${action} is rendered`,
+      ).not.toBeNull();
+      expect(
+        geo?.[action]?.right ?? 0,
+        `${action} ends inside the page`,
+      ).toBeLessThanOrEqual(geo?.hostWidth ?? 0);
+    }
+
+    expect(geo?.hostScrollWidth).toBe(geo?.hostWidth);
+    expect(geo?.header?.width).toBe(geo?.hostWidth);
+  });
+
+  test('gives the title the row rather than one glyph of it', async ({
+    app,
+  }) => {
+    // `.album-info` was squeezed to 112px beside the art, so an album
+    // called *Glass Harbour* drew as `G…`. It carries `min-width: 0`
+    // and was shrinking as asked — the row had to stack.
+    expect(await geometry(app).then((g) => g?.title)).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  test('scrolls as one page, with the header scrolling away', async ({
+    app,
+  }) => {
+    const before = await geometry(app);
+
+    expect(before?.hostScrolls).toBe(true);
+    expect(before?.contentScrolls).toBe(false);
+
+    const headerTop = () =>
+      app.evaluate(
+        () =>
+          document
+            .querySelector('explore-album-details')
+            ?.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.album-header')
+            ?.getBoundingClientRect().top ?? 0,
+      );
+
+    expect(await headerTop()).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
+
+    // A wheel gesture, not `scrollTop`: `overflow: hidden` still permits
+    // programmatic scrolling, so a probe that assigns it passes on the
+    // build this exists to fail.
+    await details(app).hover();
+    await app.mouse.wheel(0, 250);
+
+    await expect.poll(headerTop).toBeLessThan(-100);
+  });
+
+  test('is the desktop arrangement again above the breakpoint', async ({
+    app,
+  }) => {
+    await app.setViewportSize({ width: 1024, height: 800 });
+
+    // The same element, re-laid-out: one component with two
+    // arrangements, not a phone-only copy.
+    await expect
+      .poll(async () => (await geometry(app))?.hostScrolls)
+      .toBe(false);
+
+    const arrangement = await app.evaluate(() => {
+      const sr = document.querySelector('explore-album-details')?.shadowRoot;
+      const header = sr?.querySelector('.album-header');
+      const content = sr?.querySelector('.content');
+
+      return {
+        direction: header ? getComputedStyle(header).flexDirection : null,
+        contentOverflow: content ? getComputedStyle(content).overflowY : null,
+      };
+    });
+
+    expect(arrangement.direction).toBe('row');
+    expect(arrangement.contentOverflow).toBe('auto');
+  });
+});
+
+/** Albums → the second card, which navigates to the album page. */
+async function openFirstAlbum(app: Page): Promise<void> {
+  // Below 600px the sidebar is gone; the tab bar is the navigation.
+  await app.getByTestId('tab-albums').click();
+  await expect(app.getByTestId('main-content')).toHaveAttribute(
+    'data-active-view',
+    'albums',
+  );
+
+  await expect.poll(() => cardCount(app)).toBeGreaterThan(1);
+
+  // Dispatched rather than clicked: the card lives in a virtualizer
+  // inside a shadow root, and Enter expands the dropdown instead.
+  await app.evaluate(() => {
+    document
+      .querySelector('cover-grid')
+      ?.shadowRoot?.querySelectorAll('.album-card')[1]
+      ?.dispatchEvent(
+        new MouseEvent('click', { bubbles: true, composed: true }),
+      );
+  });
+
+  await expect(app.getByTestId('main-content')).toHaveAttribute(
+    'data-active-view',
+    'explore-album-details',
+  );
+  await expect(
+    details(app).locator('[data-testid="album-play"]'),
+  ).toBeVisible();
+}
+
+async function cardCount(app: Page): Promise<number> {
+  return app.evaluate(
+    () =>
+      document
+        .querySelector('cover-grid')
+        ?.shadowRoot?.querySelectorAll('.album-card').length ?? 0,
+  );
+}

frontend/src/components/config-page/shortcut-capture.ts

@@ -79,6 +79,17 @@ export class ShortcutCapture extends LitElement {
         .reset-btn:hover {
             color: var(--yj-accent-text, #ffd43b);
         }
+        /*
+         * Reset is the only way to put a rebound shortcut back, so where
+         * the device has no hover it is always visible rather than an
+         * invisible button holding its hit area. The inverse of #68's
+         * rule, which applies where the hover control is redundant.
+         */
+        @media not all and (hover: hover) {
+            .reset-btn {
+                opacity: 1;
+            }
+        }
     `;
 
     private handleClick = () => {

frontend/src/components/explore-album-details/explore-album-details.ts

@@ -892,6 +892,67 @@ export class ExploreAlbumDetails extends LitElement implements ContextMenuHost {
             .track-row .track-request {
                 flex-shrink: 0;
             }
+
+            /* ── The phone (#66) ──
+             *
+             * **This block is last on purpose**, for index.css's
+             * reason: a media query adds no specificity, so a rule
+             * written above the plain one it overrides loses to it and
+             * every declaration here is silently dead.
+             *
+             * Two faults, one shape. The page is a fixed header over a
+             * scrolling tracklist — the desktop arrangement — so at the
+             * reference device's 424x439 the header owned 253 of the
+             * panel's 318px and the tracklist scrolled inside the 64px
+             * that were left. And the header's flex row squeezed
+             * .album-info to 112px, so the title drew as one ellipsised
+             * glyph and two of the album's three primary actions were
+             * clipped by the host's own overflow: Shuffle album ended
+             * at x=443 in a 424px box, unreachable by any gesture.
+             *
+             * .album-info carries min-width: 0 and was shrinking as
+             * asked, so another one is not the fix — the row has to
+             * stack, or the info column has nothing to be wide with.
+             *
+             * The scroller moves to the host and .content stops being
+             * one, which is what makes the header scroll away; the
+             * tracklist is plain DOM rather than a virtualizer, so
+             * nothing inside wants a scroll window of its own. */
+            @media (max-width: 599px) {
+                :host {
+                    overflow-y: auto;
+                }
+
+                .album-header {
+                    flex-direction: column;
+                    align-items: flex-start;
+                    gap: 12px;
+                    padding: 12px 16px;
+                }
+
+                /* Stacked, the art is the whole of the header's width
+                 * budget and its 200px square is 45% of the reference
+                 * device's height. It is still what identifies the
+                 * album, so it shrinks rather than going. */
+                .cover-art-container {
+                    width: 140px;
+                    height: 140px;
+                }
+
+                /* A column flex item takes its content's width from
+                 * align-items: flex-start above, which would leave the
+                 * actions wrapping inside a box narrower than the row
+                 * they now have to themselves. */
+                .album-info {
+                    align-self: stretch;
+                }
+
+                .content {
+                    flex: 0 0 auto;
+                    overflow-y: visible;
+                    padding: 16px 16px 24px;
+                }
+            }
         `,
     ];
 

frontend/src/components/queue-panel/queue-panel.ts

@@ -639,23 +639,42 @@ export class QueuePanel
             text-overflow: ellipsis;
         }
 
+        /*
+         * The per-row remove is a hover affordance, and on a device
+         * without hover it is redundant rather than missing: the row's
+         * context menu is a bottom sheet since #60 and carries "Remove
+         * from Queue", so the action is one long-press away. An
+         * always-visible X would instead spend part of a 424px row on
+         * something already reachable. #68's treatment, for #68's reason.
+         *
+         * display:none outside the query rather than visibility:hidden:
+         * a hidden button still occupies its hit area and is still in
+         * the accessibility tree, so a phone would keep a target for a
+         * control it can never see.
+         */
         .remove-button {
-            background: none;
-            border: none;
-            color: var(--yj-text-tertiary, #888);
-            cursor: pointer;
-            padding: 4px;
-            display: flex;
-            align-items: center;
-            visibility: hidden;
+            display: none;
         }
 
-        .track-item:hover .remove-button {
-            visibility: visible;
-        }
+        @media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {
+            .remove-button {
+                background: none;
+                border: none;
+                color: var(--yj-text-tertiary, #888);
+                cursor: pointer;
+                padding: 4px;
+                display: flex;
+                align-items: center;
+                visibility: hidden;
+            }
 
-        .remove-button:hover {
-            color: var(--yj-error-text, #ff8787);
+            .track-item:hover .remove-button {
+                visibility: visible;
+            }
+
+            .remove-button:hover {
+                color: var(--yj-error-text, #ff8787);
+            }
         }
 
         .list-area.drag-over {

frontend/src/components/track-details/track-details.ts

@@ -529,6 +529,21 @@ export class TrackDetails extends LitElement {
             background: var(--yj-error, #e03131);
         }
 
+        /*
+         * Both are the *only* route to changing or removing a track's
+         * cover art, so where the device has no hover they are always
+         * visible rather than hidden — the inverse of #68's rule, which
+         * applies where the hover control is redundant. Revealed by
+         * opacity, so what is on screen is what the desktop reveal shows
+         * and nothing about the layout moves.
+         */
+        @media not all and (hover: hover) {
+            .cover-art-overlay,
+            .cover-art-remove {
+                opacity: 1;
+            }
+        }
+
         /* Error message */
         .error-message {
             flex: 1;

frontend/test/components/hover-affordance.test.ts

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /**
- * A hover affordance is gated on the device having hover.
+ * A hover affordance is gated on the device having hover — in whichever
+ * direction keeps the action reachable.
  *
  * The home page's cover cards reveal a play button on :hover. A touch
  * long-press synthesises a hover state in the WebView, so on a phone
@@ -7,6 +8,15 @@
  * utils/long-press.ts is measuring for a context menu — a control
  * appearing because the user was reaching for a different one.
  *
+ * #137 is the same sweep with the opposite answer for two of its three
+ * cases. Where the revealed control is the *only* route to its action,
+ * hiding it removes the action, so it is always visible where there is
+ * no hover: `track-details`'s cover-art overlay and remove, and
+ * `shortcut-capture`'s reset. The queue's per-row remove is the third,
+ * and is the redundant kind — since #60 the row's context menu is a
+ * bottom sheet carrying "Remove from Queue" — so it takes #68's
+ * treatment here.
+ *
  * This is asserted against the *parsed stylesheet* rather than by
  * emulating a touch device, and that is a limitation worth stating
  * rather than hiding. CDP's Emulation.setEmulatedMedia does not reach
@@ -24,6 +34,9 @@
 import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest';
 
 import '@components/home-view/home-view';
+import '@components/queue-panel/queue-panel';
+import '@components/track-details/track-details';
+import '@components/config-page/shortcut-capture';
 import { fixture } from '@test/support/render';
 
 /** Every rule in the element's own adopted stylesheets, flattened. */
@@ -83,3 +96,91 @@ describe('the home card play button', () => {
     expect(unconditional.some((r) => /display:\s*none/.test(r.text))).toBe(true);
   });
 });
+
+describe("the queue row's remove button", () => {
+  it('is absent where the device has no hover, the menu carrying the action', async () => {
+    const el = await fixture('queue-panel', {});
+    const rules = rulesOf(el);
+
+    expect(rules.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+
+    // visibility:hidden alone would leave an invisible button holding
+    // its hit area on a phone, which is the trap #68's commit names.
+    const unconditional = rules.filter(
+      (r) => r.condition === null && r.text.startsWith('.remove-button'),
+    );
+
+    expect(unconditional.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    expect(unconditional.some((r) => /display:\s*none/.test(r.text))).toBe(true);
+
+    const reveals = rules.filter(
+      (r) =>
+        r.text.includes('.remove-button') && /visibility:\s*visible/.test(r.text),
+    );
+
+    expect(reveals.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+
+    for (const rule of reveals) {
+      expect(rule.condition).toMatch(/hover:\s*hover/);
+      expect(rule.condition).toMatch(/pointer:\s*fine/);
+    }
+  });
+});
+
+/**
+ * The two affordances that are the only route to their action.
+ *
+ * Asserted as "there is a rule showing it, and its condition is a
+ * *negated* hover query" — the same stylesheet reading as above, for
+ * the same reason: this tier's iframe cannot be emulated as a touch
+ * device, and the regression worth catching is someone folding the rule
+ * away as redundant on the desktop it does nothing on.
+ */
+describe('an affordance with no other route', () => {
+  const cases: Array<[string, string, string[]]> = [
+    ['track-details', 'track-details', ['.cover-art-overlay', '.cover-art-remove']],
+    ['shortcut-capture', 'shortcut-capture', ['.reset-btn']],
+  ];
+
+  for (const [name, tag, selectors] of cases) {
+    it(`${name} shows it where the device has no hover`, async () => {
+      const el = await fixture(tag, {});
+      const rules = rulesOf(el);
+
+      expect(rules.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+
+      for (const selector of selectors) {
+        const shown = rules.filter(
+          (r) =>
+            r.condition !== null &&
+            r.text.includes(selector) &&
+            /opacity:\s*1/.test(r.text),
+        );
+
+        const touch = shown.filter((r) => /not[\s\S]*hover:\s*hover/.test(r.condition!));
+
+        expect(touch.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+      }
+    });
+  }
+
+  // The one half this tier can measure rather than read: the query is
+  // negated, so on the hover-capable browser running these tests the
+  // control must still be revealed by hover and by nothing else. A rule
+  // written without the `not` would show it here, permanently, on every
+  // desktop.
+  it('leaves the desktop reveal alone, where the device does have hover', async () => {
+    expect(matchMedia('(hover: hover)').matches).toBe(true);
+
+    const el = await fixture('shortcut-capture', {
+      action: 'player.next',
+      label: 'Next Track',
+      currentKey: 'X',
+      defaultKey: 'N',
+    });
+    const btn = el.shadowRoot?.querySelector('.reset-btn');
+
+    expect(btn).not.toBeNull();
+    expect(getComputedStyle(btn!).opacity).toBe('0');
+  });
+});