deea6ad06d54e5c9a82a2366a0784e17a4f19de4
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 logan
|
1ab767a317 |
feat(shell): take the top bar out of the phone's layout
The row is deleted from the grid template below 600px, not the header hidden. That is 3.25em of a 439 CSS px viewport -- the single biggest vertical win the reference device has to give, and the reason the issue asks for the row rather than for a smaller bar. Each of the five things the bar held has somewhere else to be there: nav-history is the platform's own back gesture and was already gone from 899 down, the job indicator is <job-band> (#62, which is what this was blocked on), the search box is a modal opened from the view's own header, the library filter is Settings -> Libraries, and the wordmark stays where it is. Three things are load-bearing. **The header is visually hidden rather than display: none**, because that h1 is the document's top-level heading and several pages have no other one -- page-header renders no h1 when its heading is empty, and Settings has no page-header at all. Its four controls are display: none *inside* it, which is what keeps them out of the tab order: a visually-hidden container is still focusable, and tabbing into a search box nobody can see is worse than not having one. **The fit pass stands down**, from the bar's computed position rather than from a width. With the bar out of flow there is no content box to measure children against, and a pass that ran would collapse the wordmark on every resize and report success about a 1px box. **top-bar-fit.spec.ts keeps 390 and asserts the stronger property.** "Nothing hangs out of the bar" is trivially true of a bar with no row and would pass on a build that merely broke it, so what that width asks now is that the content starts where the row above it ends. Measuring against the window instead would have been asserting "and no background job is running", which that spec is not about and cannot arrange. Closes #57 |
||
|
logan
|
23f5a0c53a |
feat(shell): show background jobs in the phone's layout, not a popover
The header indicator is a disclosure anchored to a bar 3.25em tall on a screen 439 CSS px tall, and it was reported as unreadable behind other UI. Background work is the one thing a phone should not make you open something to see, and #57 deletes the bar it hangs from and is blocked on it having somewhere else to live. Below 600px the indicator stands down and <job-band> takes over. It is the existing job-panel at `kinds="*"`, so pause, cancel, Details and the log come along, and so does applyJobControl. **It is in the layout, not over it**, and that was measured rather than assumed. The first version put the panel in notification-host's fixed band: it renders correctly, sits on top and stays inside the viewport, and is unusable -- at 424x439 a compact panel showing two jobs is ~216px of a 439px screen, drawn over the content and swallowing every tap under it. Four e2e specs caught it, and none of them was about jobs: two phone-shell journeys and the header's action menu, all failing on clicks the band was intercepting. As a grid row above the main panel it pushes instead, which is #24's one sentence deciding a layout question -- a band that hides the app to say the app is busy has traded the popover's fault for a worse one. It renders nothing above 600px, from matchMedia rather than a media query, because that decides whether the element exists: Settings already holds four job-panels and a fifth answering for every kind is bottom-nav's "resolved to 2 elements" trap again. index.css keeps it display:none off the phone for a second reason -- an in-flow grid child with no named area is auto-placed into one of the shell's rows, which is what the skip link is absolutely positioned to avoid. top-bar-fit's 390px case asserted the indicator was up, so that it could not pass by measuring the idle case under another name. At phone width it is now deliberately away, so the assertion takes the other branch of the same rule -- the indicator is hidden, the band has the row, and the bar still has nothing hanging out of it -- rather than the width being quietly dropped from the list. The report's own symptom is deliberately not asserted anywhere: it did not reproduce in this tier. Measured at 424x439 the popover was neither clipped nor covered, so a spec claiming a stacking fix would be asserting something that was never true here. The spec says so. Closes #62 |
||
|
logan
|
ae85df0dad |
fix(shell): give the top bar a measured fit at every width
The bar was 611px inside a 600px viewport at the bottom of the Compact band, and 862px while a scan with a real library's title ran, because `job-indicator` is `hidden` when idle and 235px wide when it is not. `body` is `overflow-x: auto`, so a user got a horizontal scrollbar on a shell #24 promised would not need one — and the band is 600 to 899 with work in flight, not the 600 to 610 the idle measurement suggested. `services/top-bar-fit.ts` is `page-header`'s treatment one bar up: a ResizeObserver, every pass starting from all-visible, hiding the lowest-priority child until it fits. Measured rather than breakpointed because three of the five children are as wide as their content — the library filter by the longest library name, the indicator by the running job's title, the search box by its view-scoped placeholder — so any width picked is right for one library, one job and one view. What yields is decided by #24's own sentence, which rules out the two cheapest candidates in the Direction. Hiding the library filter takes away an action, since it is the only control in the app that selects a library (filed as #148, which is the phone already doing it), and collapsing search to an icon is #57's, which is blocked behind #62. So the wordmark yields first — a brand the window title bar repeats, and visually-hidden rather than `display: none` because that h1 is the document's heading — and then the indicator's label, leaving the ring, which the component already does below 600px and whose live region announces the state either way. "Fits" is the children against the content box, not `scrollWidth` against `clientWidth`: `scrollWidth` counts the left padding and not the right, so the first version read 700/700 with the indicator sitting in the whole right gutter. And the bar does not resize when a job starts, which is the case this is for, so every child is observed too. Pinned before it was fixed, as the issue asks. On the unfixed build the new spec fails at 600 idle and at 600, 800 and 900 with a job, and passes at 390, 899 and 1440; `layout-overflow.spec.ts` gains 600x600 and failed there. That spec asserts on the *shell*, so it was green throughout this defect — the per-child measurement is #69's lesson, and it is what caught the gutter case above. Closes #143 |