b5bdba2f38d4c20923e582d3b80c5651376fd975
6
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 logan
|
52d095e3c6 |
feat(android): the phone's "More" is a bottom sheet
The tab bar's fifth item opened `<app-sidebar>` in a `wa-drawer` sliding in from the side, which is a desktop shape put on a phone: a 200px column of a 424px screen, opening away from the thumb that asked for it, with the rest of its 400px band empty. It also had three nested scrollers in it -- the dialog, its body, and the sidebar's own `overflow-y: auto` host -- so which box a drag moved depended on where the finger landed, which is the "only part of the screen scrolls under my finger" in the report. It is the same element with `placement="bottom"` and `without-header`, so the surface is the sheet #60 already built rather than a second pattern: a `wa-drawer` is a native `<dialog>` opened with `showModal()`, which is exactly the top layer that finding rests on, so the focus trap, Escape, tap-outside and `wa-after-hide` come along unchanged and nothing new has to be proved about paint containment. The sidebar is still mounted rather than re-listed as data, because the shell's own copy is `display: none` below 600px rather than removed -- a second list drawing `nav-*` handles is the duplicate-testid failure this component already renders conditionally to avoid. What `expanded` means had to grow to say the host owns the *box*: `app-sidebar` writes an inline width and caps itself at 400px, which beats any rule the host could write, so the width, the scrolling and the mouse-only resize handle now follow that attribute. The rows are 48px below 600px, stated in the sidebar's own stylesheet since that is the only place it renders there. Measured in the running app at 424x439: the sheet is 424 wide, 373 tall (85vh, so there is an outside to tap), rows 48px, one scroller with `overscroll-behavior: contain`, and Settings' row reachable at the end of it. Desktop and Compact are untouched. Closes #71 |
||
|
logan
|
2be6fb3066 |
feat(player): draw no volume control where there is no volume
volume-control asks the player whether there is a volume of ours to
control, and renders nothing when there is not. The decision is in the
control rather than at either mount point because there are two, and
one of them -- the bottom bar's -- lives in index.html, which has no
module scope to make it conditional.
It could not have been a width, and that is the whole design decision.
Every other stand-down rule in this app is keyed on a viewport, because
a width is what a browser can answer and what every tier can test.
This one is a property of the build: keyed on width, an Android tablet
at 600px or more draws the bar's slider over a level the backend has
pinned -- a control that cannot act, on exactly the platform the rule
exists for, which library-status-indicator settled is worse than none.
The same rule is wrong the other way below 600px, where a narrow
desktop window has no hardware keys to fall back on. index.css keeps
its phone rule, which is now about room and says so.
Rendering nothing and hiding the host are both needed and are separate
assertions: an empty shadow root is what stops a by-role or positional
query finding a button that cannot act, and :host([hidden]) is what
stops the element taking a flex item's worth of the transport. The
host rule has to be written down, since :host { display: inline-flex }
outranks the UA's [hidden].
Measured at 424x439 by flipping the constant and rebuilding: the album
art goes 39px to 68px and the transport 172px to 143px -- 29px, being
the 21px control plus the 8px gap a hidden box stops drawing. The
bar's centring is unaffected, since #23's outer columns are the same
min() expression rather than content-sized.
volume-ownership.test.ts is the tier that can exercise the Android
rendering, on an ordinary Linux runner, because the predicate is a
stubbable backend answer. Both of its tests were confirmed to fail on
the build before this.
Closes #64
Closes #172
|
||
|
logan
|
ffc9490a32 |
fix(player): put the phone's Now Playing button above the artwork
`.expand` is the phone's only route into the full-screen now-playing view. It is absolutely positioned with `z-index: auto` over `.cover-art`, which is a *later* sibling with the same z-index, so the two tie on paint order and the later one wins. An `<img>` costs nothing there; a track with no artwork renders a placeholder `wa-icon`, which takes every click aimed at the button underneath it. So the control did not work whenever the current song had no cover, on the one platform that has no other way in. Nothing to do with the fixture: any library has untagged files. Measured at 390px with elementFromPoint at the button's centre — the icon with a placeholder, the button with an image, and the button either way with the z-index. Chosen over `pointer-events: none` on the art, which would take the cover preview's mouseenter with it, and over reordering the DOM, which leaves the same tie to be won by the same accident in the other direction. This was filed as an e2e flake, and the diagnosis was wrong: it failed on both engines three times across two branches that could not have caused it, and passed on re-run each time, because the spec starts the *first* row of the track list and which track that is depends on the order the scan inserted rows — the same root cause as #156. The new spec picks a track *for* having no artwork, and asserts the placeholder is rendered rather than assuming it, so it cannot quietly go back to measuring the easy case. Two things it has to get right, both already documented traps: the track must be the 90-second one, since a 2-second one finishes before the assertions run; and `library.Track.CoverArt` is empty for all 31 fixture rows, so "the first track with no cover art" selects nothing in particular and picked a short one. Verified by mutation: without the z-index the new spec fails on the click in 30s, and the pre-existing one beside it passes, which is exactly how this survived. Closes #150 |
||
|
logan
|
dc8db159f9 |
feat(player): centre the transport and show the volume inline
Two issues over one bar, because they are one relayout. #42's own findings say so: giving wa-slider a label grows it 6px to 14px and moves the transport, which is #23's subject, so doing them in sequence means measuring the bar twice and throwing the first set away. The bar was `320px 1fr auto`, so the transport sat in the middle of what the metadata and the queue button did not use — its centre was ~140px right of the window's at every width. The outer two tracks are the same expression now, so the middle is centred by construction. The side width is the metadata's, capped at a quarter of the bar, and the cap was measured as a regression before it was a decision: reserving the full `--now-playing-width` on both sides is perfectly centred and takes the seek bar's track from 257px to 61px at 800px, and to 0 at 200% text. The control you drag was paying for the symmetry. With the cap it is 246, which is parity. It is a `min()` rather than a breakpoint because that variable is user state — the metadata has a drag handle — and tying both sides to it is also what keeps dragging meaningful; a plain `1fr … 1fr` centres just as well and silently makes the handle a no-op. The volume moved out of `audio-player` into the bar because the transport column has to hold the transport and nothing else, and it joins the queue button in one cell rather than a second column, since the centring compares columns. It is a slider by default and a popup by setting. The stored flag names the *popup*, which is this config's polarity rule — the zero value has to be the intended answer, so an existing config.toml gets the new default with no migration. Inline, the icon is the mute toggle and is named after that action rather than the state, because with the slider beside it there is nothing to disclose; the component tier now covers both presentations rather than whichever is default. Three nested rules in this block began with a bare element selector, which Chrome 120 relaxed and the phone's Chrome 113 **silently drops** — including the ellipsis on the bar's own title and artist, which has therefore never truncated on the device. They are `&`-prefixed now. Filed as #154 for the class and for a check. `bottom-bar.spec.ts` pins both halves separately on purpose: an uncapped build is perfectly centred and fails only the seek-bar width, so a spec asserting centring alone would have passed the regression above. Both were verified by mutation. Closes #23 Closes #42 |
||
|
logan
|
1b05dde382 |
feat(ui): the full-screen now playing a phone needs
Plan 016 B2, phase 2. Phase 1 took the seek bar and the volume out of the phone's bottom bar -- 4px of height is not a thumb target, and a phone's volume belongs to its hardware keys -- and promised them a full-screen view. This is it, reached from a button over the mini player's cover art. **It composes the transport rather than reimplementing it.** The same `seek-bar`, `player-controls` and `volume-control` the desktop bar uses; a phone layout that copies them is a second transport to fix every bug in, and the seek bar in particular carries interpolation rules that took a plan of their own to get right. The seek bar thickens its own track below the breakpoint, in its own stylesheet, because the track size lives on a wa-slider inside its shadow root where a custom property from the host cannot reach. **It is a detail view, not a primary one.** It is somewhere you go and come back from, so index.ts pushes the current view and Back pops it -- which is also why it is not a fifth tab: a tab you cannot leave by pressing it again is not a tab. Two things came from reading a screenshot rather than from a failing test, and both were invisible to assertions that were individually correct. **The mini player was still under the full-screen view**, repeating it in 4em of an 844px phone. index.css hides the bottom bar while `#main-content[data-active-view="now-playing"]`, through `:has()` rather than a class toggled from index.ts, because the active view is already published as an attribute. That takes the queue button with it, so the view carries its own. **And phase 1's shell rules had never applied.** A media query adds no specificity, and the phone block sat above the plain rules it meant to override, so at 390px the header kept its 2em gutters (32px), its 16px gap and its 24px title, and the bottom bar kept a fixed 320px first column. Nothing failed: the shell fits because of `min-width: 0` and each component's own media query, which live in their own stylesheets and have no later rule to lose to -- so what was dead was exactly the cosmetic half no assertion looks at. The phone rules are one section at the end of the file now, and it says why it is last. Measured after: 12px, 8px, 17.6px, `154px 187px 33px`. |
||
|
logan
|
57fbbdf0d2 |
feat(ui): a shell a phone can be held in
Plan 016 B2, phase 1. Below 600px the grid drops its sidebar column, `bottom-nav` becomes the primary navigation, and the shell fits the viewport instead of scrolling sideways out of it. 600 rather than the sidebar's own 900, because 900 is a laptop and the answer there is a narrower sidebar, which is still a sidebar. Under 600 there is no room for one at all: 360px of viewport over a 200px nav is not a layout. **The tab bar is four destinations and a way to everything else.** Three to five is where touch targets stop being thumb-sized -- eleven over 360px is 32px each -- so the four are the ones plan 016's subset says a phone is for, and "More" opens the *existing* `app-sidebar` in a drawer rather than listing the destinations a second time. Two lists is two places to add the next view to. That reuse has a cost this found the hard way: a shared component brings its `data-testid`s with it, so rendering the drawer's sidebar unconditionally put a second `nav-home` (and ten siblings) in the DOM and **failed 30 existing specs** with "resolved to 2 elements" -- on a desktop viewport, where this element is `display: none` and the drawer can never open. It renders only while the drawer is open, and the component test asserts the absence, because the failure is invisible from inside the component and lands in files nobody touched. **What made the shell overflow was minimums, not padding.** Measured at 360px: the body was 652px wide, because a `min-width` in a flex row is a hard floor and a grid item's implicit minimum is its content. So `min-width: 0` on the boxes between the viewport and the content, and each component stands its own non-essential parts down in its *own* stylesheet -- search-bar's 200px floor, job-indicator's label (the visible one; the live region that announces it is untouched), audio-player's seek bar and volume. A media query inside a shadow root is answered by the viewport, so this is the component saying what it drops rather than the shell reaching in. Volume goes because the hardware keys own it on a phone, which is the same reason mediacontrols' Android handler implements no volume callback. Seeking goes because 4px is not a thumb target; it belongs to the full-screen now-playing view, which is the next phase. An existing spec therefore asserts the opposite of what it did: layout-overflow's 320px case used to require that the 464px behind `overflow: hidden` could be *scrolled to*, which was the remedy available while the shell had one layout. It reflows now -- 320px in a 320px viewport, exactly -- and reflow is what WCAG 1.4.10 asked for. |