Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
yonlu 7be4a02e31 fix(ci): give the unclaim step a CA bundle
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m27s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m14s
Second defect in the same workflow. The shell fix took -- the step ran
under `bash --noprofile --norc -e -o pipefail` -- and got one layer
further before failing:

  curl: (77) error setting certificate file: /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt

ubuntu:24.04 ships no CA bundle, and --no-install-recommends skips the
ca-certificates that curl recommends, so curl came up unable to verify
TLS against our own Gitea.

This was avoidable by reading the repo rather than reasoning about it:
ci.yml (twice), desktop-assets.yml, android-apk.yml and release.yml all
spell out `ca-certificates curl ... jq` for exactly this reason. The
convention was written down five times already.

Validated in the real image this time rather than by extracting the
script and running it on the host, which is what missed this: the step
now succeeds inside `docker run ubuntu:24.04` against a scratch issue --
label present, 204, label gone -- and the previous version reproduces
`curl: (77)` in the same image. Both checked, then the scratch issue was
deleted.

The DELETE also keeps its response body now and prints it on a non-204.
Whether the automatic token carries issue-write scope is still unproven,
because both failures happened before the API call, and "403" without
Gitea's own sentence would cost another merge to interpret.

Closes #102
2026-08-18 19:08:50 -04:00
yonlu a83a127e31 fix(ci): run the unclaim step under bash
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m28s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m14s
The workflow shipped in #103 and failed on every close, on its second
line, before reaching the API:

  shell: sh -e {0}
  /var/run/act/workflow/0.sh: 2: set: Illegal option -o pipefail

Inside `container:` the act runner selects sh, not bash, and
`set -o pipefail` is a bashism. homebrew-formula.yml carries the same
line without trouble because it runs with no container, on the host
image where bash is the default -- so "another workflow does it" was
not the evidence it looked like, and the comment now says so where the
next person will read it.

pipefail is kept rather than dropped for POSIX's sake: the lookup is
`curl -sSf ... | jq`, so without it an API error yields empty output,
an empty label id, and a cheerful "nothing to do" on every close. A
silent no-op is the one outcome worse than a failing job here.

Validated end to end against scratch issues rather than by reading it:
with the label present the step returns 204 and the label is gone, and
against an issue that never carried it the step also returns 204 and
exits 0 -- which is what makes it safe to run on every close rather
than only claimed ones.

Still untested: whether secrets.GITEA_TOKEN carries issue-write scope.
The old run never got far enough to find out. If it 403s, the fix is
one line -- secrets.PACKAGE_TOKEN, which is a user PAT.

Closes #102
2026-08-18 18:54:39 -04:00
yonlu 0c944f2382 ci: drop the claim label when an issue closes
CI / check (push) Skipped
CI / e2e (push) Skipped
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m27s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 6m17s
A `Closes #N` footer closes the issue on merge and leaves
`Status/In Progress` on it, because Gitea's auto-close touches state
and nothing else. #100 was closed and simultaneously marked as being
actively worked on. `scripts/issue.sh close` does drop the label, and
is exactly the call the footer exists to avoid making.

This hooks the close rather than the merge. Stripping the label in the
PR would work and would be a per-PR habit, which is what the footer
removed in the first place; `issues: [closed]` covers the footer,
issue.sh close and a click in the web UI alike, and asks nothing of
anyone at any of them.

Reopening deliberately does not restore the label: reopening says the
work was not finished, not that somebody is at a keyboard now.

Two costs, both stated in the file rather than discovered later. The
runner has capacity 1 and is shared with an index build that can hold
it for three hours, so this is not instant -- stale for an afternoon
beats stale forever, which is what it was. And it is an eighth
workflow, so CLAUDE.md's count moves with it.

The audit stays, because a workflow that silently stops firing is the
failure mode this area has already produced once:

  ./scripts/issue.sh list --state closed --label "Status/In Progress"

Closes #102
2026-08-18 17:36:05 -04:00