49445ded77be8fdad526d9e55a663a378ef6a1b7
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 logan
|
20c337651f |
fix(ui): the phone's nav sheet says when it scrolls
Since #71 the phone's "More" is a bottom sheet, and at the reference viewport it does not fit: measured at 424x439 with the seed's eight destinations, the body is scrollHeight 412 against clientHeight 373, so 39px is below a fold nothing announces. Where the cut lands on a row boundary the sheet ends in a clean edge that reads as the end of the list, which is what #207 fixed one sheet over. The rule is that sheet's, not a second answer to the same question: #207's two background layers move into styles/sheet-scroll.css.ts and both sheets adopt them, with the colour left to each host as --yj-sheet-surface. The nav sheet paints the sidebar's --yj-bg-surface and the context sheet the menus' --yj-bg-elevated, so a shared rule that hard-coded either would draw that seam across the other one. The half that makes it visible is that nothing inside the sheet may repaint the surface. These are layers on the scroller, and app-sidebar's host carries the same grey -- in the shell its own background, in the sheet a second opaque copy of the sheet's, over the fade. With the fragment adopted and that rule missing, the running app measured a flat 52,58,64 to the bottom edge with 39px still below: the defect unchanged, with every assertion about background-attachment passing. menu-surface already meets it from the other side, where the sheet's panel is background-color: transparent. Closes #210 |
||
|
logan
|
52d095e3c6 |
feat(android): the phone's "More" is a bottom sheet
The tab bar's fifth item opened `<app-sidebar>` in a `wa-drawer` sliding in from the side, which is a desktop shape put on a phone: a 200px column of a 424px screen, opening away from the thumb that asked for it, with the rest of its 400px band empty. It also had three nested scrollers in it -- the dialog, its body, and the sidebar's own `overflow-y: auto` host -- so which box a drag moved depended on where the finger landed, which is the "only part of the screen scrolls under my finger" in the report. It is the same element with `placement="bottom"` and `without-header`, so the surface is the sheet #60 already built rather than a second pattern: a `wa-drawer` is a native `<dialog>` opened with `showModal()`, which is exactly the top layer that finding rests on, so the focus trap, Escape, tap-outside and `wa-after-hide` come along unchanged and nothing new has to be proved about paint containment. The sidebar is still mounted rather than re-listed as data, because the shell's own copy is `display: none` below 600px rather than removed -- a second list drawing `nav-*` handles is the duplicate-testid failure this component already renders conditionally to avoid. What `expanded` means had to grow to say the host owns the *box*: `app-sidebar` writes an inline width and caps itself at 400px, which beats any rule the host could write, so the width, the scrolling and the mouse-only resize handle now follow that attribute. The rows are 48px below 600px, stated in the sidebar's own stylesheet since that is the only place it renders there. Measured in the running app at 424x439: the sheet is 424 wide, 373 tall (85vh, so there is an outside to tap), rows 48px, one scroller with `overscroll-behavior: contain`, and Settings' row reachable at the end of it. Desktop and Compact are untouched. Closes #71 |
||
|
logan
|
f18691560d |
fix(shell): publish the active view, so both navs follow the back path
The nav components learned where the user was from the `navigate` CustomEvent, which only the outbound path dispatches: `popstate` calls `handleNavigate()` directly. So a back-navigation left both of them highlighting the view just left — desktop included, at any width, on any back across two primary views. Opening a detail view was the same cause wearing a different symptom: `app-sidebar` guarded on its own item list and kept its highlight, `bottom-nav` did not and lit nothing. It cannot be fixed by re-dispatching `navigate` — `index.ts` is that event's document listener, so that is an infinite loop, and "please go to X" is not the statement being made. `activeViewStore` is the shell saying "the active view is now X", once per navigation, `popstate` included; both navs read it through a controller and hold no `activeView` of their own. A store rather than an event because a component that mounts *after* a navigation still has to know: `bottom-nav`'s drawer builds its `app-sidebar` on open, and that copy had heard nothing at all, so the drawer opened on Home from any page in the app. Closes #72 |
||
|
logan
|
57fbbdf0d2 |
feat(ui): a shell a phone can be held in
Plan 016 B2, phase 1. Below 600px the grid drops its sidebar column, `bottom-nav` becomes the primary navigation, and the shell fits the viewport instead of scrolling sideways out of it. 600 rather than the sidebar's own 900, because 900 is a laptop and the answer there is a narrower sidebar, which is still a sidebar. Under 600 there is no room for one at all: 360px of viewport over a 200px nav is not a layout. **The tab bar is four destinations and a way to everything else.** Three to five is where touch targets stop being thumb-sized -- eleven over 360px is 32px each -- so the four are the ones plan 016's subset says a phone is for, and "More" opens the *existing* `app-sidebar` in a drawer rather than listing the destinations a second time. Two lists is two places to add the next view to. That reuse has a cost this found the hard way: a shared component brings its `data-testid`s with it, so rendering the drawer's sidebar unconditionally put a second `nav-home` (and ten siblings) in the DOM and **failed 30 existing specs** with "resolved to 2 elements" -- on a desktop viewport, where this element is `display: none` and the drawer can never open. It renders only while the drawer is open, and the component test asserts the absence, because the failure is invisible from inside the component and lands in files nobody touched. **What made the shell overflow was minimums, not padding.** Measured at 360px: the body was 652px wide, because a `min-width` in a flex row is a hard floor and a grid item's implicit minimum is its content. So `min-width: 0` on the boxes between the viewport and the content, and each component stands its own non-essential parts down in its *own* stylesheet -- search-bar's 200px floor, job-indicator's label (the visible one; the live region that announces it is untouched), audio-player's seek bar and volume. A media query inside a shadow root is answered by the viewport, so this is the component saying what it drops rather than the shell reaching in. Volume goes because the hardware keys own it on a phone, which is the same reason mediacontrols' Android handler implements no volume callback. Seeking goes because 4px is not a thumb target; it belongs to the full-screen now-playing view, which is the next phase. An existing spec therefore asserts the opposite of what it did: layout-overflow's 320px case used to require that the 464px behind `overflow: hidden` could be *scrolled to*, which was the remedy available while the shell had one layout. It reflows now -- 320px in a 320px viewport, exactly -- and reflow is what WCAG 1.4.10 asked for. |