2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
logan	6a5a3c33dc	fix(shell): raise the page header's controls to the touch floor ... #56 sized the playback transport for a thumb and named 44px; the queue header keeps it. Nothing else was resized, so the controls a user meets on *every* screen sat between a third and two thirds of the app's own floor. Measured on the reference device at 424x439: page-sort 99x23, page-sort-direction **28x21**, page-actions-more 38x27, and search-trigger 40x40. **Both questions the issue left open are answered by one measurement.** The header is 63px tall and its controls are 20-23px, so the vertical room was already there; the select and its direction arrow are 6px apart, so the horizontal room was not. That makes this min-size rather than padding with a negative margin, which is what the seek bar needed (#187), and the difference decides everything else. There the painted track had to stay thin, so the target was grown past its own box and had to be checked against its neighbours. Here the control *is* the target: the boxes are flex items, so the gap keeps them apart and **no two targets can overlap by construction**. From which: **There is no phone branch.** A 44px control on a desktop is merely large, and a second declaration of what a phone shows is a second thing to keep in step -- which is why this component has never had one. It also avoids a media query no tier here renders, which is exactly how the seek bar's phone rule came to be dead for months. **#69's overflow fit does not move.** That pass measures inline size, so the height costs it nothing, and only the two square controls grow the header's content -- by 22px in total. header-action-overflow.spec.ts passes unchanged at all four of its widths, which was the check rather than the assumption. Verified on the device that the count is still shown at 424px, so nothing has started yielding. search-trigger is the sharpest case and is fixed in the same pass: #57 created it as the phone's replacement for the header search box, so it exists *only* where there is a thumb, and it shipped at 40x40 under a comment calling that "the smallest a touch target should be". That was the floor restated four pixels short rather than a second opinion about it, and the comment now says so. Unlike #187 this can be measured rather than inferred: the controls are plain elements and the rule is a min-size, so it holds at every width and a real Chromium rendering a real page-header gives the actual answer. The tests fail with the device's own numbers -- 29x21, 38, 40. Verified on the device: every control in the header is now at least 44x44, and so is the phone's search button. **This is the Direction's first step, not all of it.** config-field's 93 Settings controls and explore-view's search row are the second pass; Settings is a form with one shape for every row and wants its own argument. #186 stays open for them.	2026-08-21 19:45:20 -04:00
logan	b801fa533a	feat(shell): make search a button and a modal where searching applies ... The phone's top bar is about to go, and the search box is the one thing in it that is an action rather than chrome. It becomes a button in the row that already says which page you are on, opening a wa-dialog with the real search box in it. Three decisions worth the words. **A wa-dialog, and that is a mechanism rather than a taste.** wa-popup renders `<div popover="manual">` and feature-detects the Popover API, falling back to `strategy: "fixed"` where there is none -- which is Chrome 113, the reference device, since `popover` is Chrome 114. And `position: fixed` escapes ancestor overflow but not `contain: paint`, which `.main-panel` carries, so a popup-shaped search panel opened from a view's header is structurally clipped on that device. `<dialog>` / `showModal()` is Chrome 37 and uses the real top layer. No tier here can see the difference -- CI's Chromium and WebKit both have the Popover API -- so the component test asserts the *mechanism*, a native `<dialog>` in the tree, rather than the symptom. **An element, not a PageAction.** Two of the seven searchable views are detail views with no page-header; they filter on the term and say so in their own headers. Declaring search as an action would mean seven hosts each writing it out, which is a second list of searchable views, and it would put a phone mode for actions inside page-header, which that component documents its refusal to grow. search-store's own map is the condition, asked by one component placed three times. **The modal carries the real search-bar**, so there is still one debounce, one clear button and one view-scoped placeholder. Escape closes it and *keeps* the term -- the input treats Escape as "clear the search", which is right in a header where the box stays on screen and wrong in a surface whose dismissal would then discard the search.	2026-08-20 20:02:50 -04:00