docs/issue-driven-workflow
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 logan
|
1b05dde382 |
feat(ui): the full-screen now playing a phone needs
Plan 016 B2, phase 2. Phase 1 took the seek bar and the volume out of the phone's bottom bar -- 4px of height is not a thumb target, and a phone's volume belongs to its hardware keys -- and promised them a full-screen view. This is it, reached from a button over the mini player's cover art. **It composes the transport rather than reimplementing it.** The same `seek-bar`, `player-controls` and `volume-control` the desktop bar uses; a phone layout that copies them is a second transport to fix every bug in, and the seek bar in particular carries interpolation rules that took a plan of their own to get right. The seek bar thickens its own track below the breakpoint, in its own stylesheet, because the track size lives on a wa-slider inside its shadow root where a custom property from the host cannot reach. **It is a detail view, not a primary one.** It is somewhere you go and come back from, so index.ts pushes the current view and Back pops it -- which is also why it is not a fifth tab: a tab you cannot leave by pressing it again is not a tab. Two things came from reading a screenshot rather than from a failing test, and both were invisible to assertions that were individually correct. **The mini player was still under the full-screen view**, repeating it in 4em of an 844px phone. index.css hides the bottom bar while `#main-content[data-active-view="now-playing"]`, through `:has()` rather than a class toggled from index.ts, because the active view is already published as an attribute. That takes the queue button with it, so the view carries its own. **And phase 1's shell rules had never applied.** A media query adds no specificity, and the phone block sat above the plain rules it meant to override, so at 390px the header kept its 2em gutters (32px), its 16px gap and its 24px title, and the bottom bar kept a fixed 320px first column. Nothing failed: the shell fits because of `min-width: 0` and each component's own media query, which live in their own stylesheets and have no later rule to lose to -- so what was dead was exactly the cosmetic half no assertion looks at. The phone rules are one section at the end of the file now, and it says why it is last. Measured after: 12px, 8px, 17.6px, `154px 187px 33px`. |
||
|
logan
|
57fbbdf0d2 |
feat(ui): a shell a phone can be held in
Plan 016 B2, phase 1. Below 600px the grid drops its sidebar column, `bottom-nav` becomes the primary navigation, and the shell fits the viewport instead of scrolling sideways out of it. 600 rather than the sidebar's own 900, because 900 is a laptop and the answer there is a narrower sidebar, which is still a sidebar. Under 600 there is no room for one at all: 360px of viewport over a 200px nav is not a layout. **The tab bar is four destinations and a way to everything else.** Three to five is where touch targets stop being thumb-sized -- eleven over 360px is 32px each -- so the four are the ones plan 016's subset says a phone is for, and "More" opens the *existing* `app-sidebar` in a drawer rather than listing the destinations a second time. Two lists is two places to add the next view to. That reuse has a cost this found the hard way: a shared component brings its `data-testid`s with it, so rendering the drawer's sidebar unconditionally put a second `nav-home` (and ten siblings) in the DOM and **failed 30 existing specs** with "resolved to 2 elements" -- on a desktop viewport, where this element is `display: none` and the drawer can never open. It renders only while the drawer is open, and the component test asserts the absence, because the failure is invisible from inside the component and lands in files nobody touched. **What made the shell overflow was minimums, not padding.** Measured at 360px: the body was 652px wide, because a `min-width` in a flex row is a hard floor and a grid item's implicit minimum is its content. So `min-width: 0` on the boxes between the viewport and the content, and each component stands its own non-essential parts down in its *own* stylesheet -- search-bar's 200px floor, job-indicator's label (the visible one; the live region that announces it is untouched), audio-player's seek bar and volume. A media query inside a shadow root is answered by the viewport, so this is the component saying what it drops rather than the shell reaching in. Volume goes because the hardware keys own it on a phone, which is the same reason mediacontrols' Android handler implements no volume callback. Seeking goes because 4px is not a thumb target; it belongs to the full-screen now-playing view, which is the next phase. An existing spec therefore asserts the opposite of what it did: layout-overflow's 320px case used to require that the 464px behind `overflow: hidden` could be *scrolled to*, which was the remedy available while the shell had one layout. It reflows now -- 320px in a 320px viewport, exactly -- and reflow is what WCAG 1.4.10 asked for. |