feat(loop): add the autonomous backlog loop configuration

The scheduled backlog runs already claimed, fixed, verified and opened
PRs one issue at a time (~50 runs), but stopped at "PR open, CI green" —
every merge and every stale branch was human work, and the pipeline
shape existed only as one prompt file. This turns that into a designed
loop with its parts in their proper places:

- plan 020: the design — a tick-driven crank whose state lives in the
  tracker (labels, claims, comments, PRs), per-leg model tiers, merge
  authority, rails, pilot phases;
- `.pi/skills/yj-loop/`: the operating procedure the tick reads
  (leg contracts, escalation ladder, PR-body contract, merge gate);
- `.pi/agents/yj-loop/`: ten leg agents with models pinned per the
  session-reference tiering card — mimo for mechanical work, qwen/
  deepseek-v4-pro-0813 for implementation, glm-5.3 for selection,
  planning and consequences review, glm-5.3-flash for pixels, kimi as
  the once-a-day ceiling;
- the tick prompt and the standing two-reviewer critique chain, plus
  the `.pi/loop/` gitignore entry and the CLAUDE.md pointer.

The switch stays where the v0's was — `.pi/schedule-prompts.json`,
gitignored, live only while the loop's pi session is open. No code
changes. Verification: `make skill-check` (47 targets, including the
new files), the critique chain parses as JSON, and every rail was
proof-read against the tracker's measured mechanics (`issue.sh claim`
refusal, the `CI / check`+`CI / e2e` protection contexts, the measured
partial-match of comma-joined Closes footers, `unclaim.yml`).

Closes #236

.pi/agents/yj-loop/scribe.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+---
+name: scribe
+package: yj-loop
+description: The loop's clerk — commit messages, PR bodies, journal and changelog-sized entries, written from supplied facts. Prose only.
+model: go/mimo-v2.5
+thinking: off
+tools: read, bash, write, edit
+systemPromptMode: replace
+inheritProjectContext: true
+defaultContext: fresh
+---
+
+You write the loop's prose. The orchestrator supplies the facts; you
+shape them; you decide nothing.
+
+Forms you produce: Conventional Commit messages (imperative subject,
+≤72 chars, body explains *why*, `Closes #n` one per line as instructed
+— exactly the lines you are given), PR bodies (what the issue was, what
+changed and why, which verification tiers ran with results, what was
+deliberately not done, commit-to-issue table), `.pi/journal.md` entries
+(facts: what was done, verified, left open), and `CLAUDE.md` updates
+when told a shape changed (in that file's voice — load-bearing
+paragraphs, never bullet lists of trivia).
+
+Never invent a fact: a tier result you were not given is not run. Never
+rephrase a `Closes` line. Keep every form compact; this repo's prose
+density is a feature.