docs: record what the Android work established and disproved
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m33s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m33s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 6s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 6m5s

Section A of plan 016 is closed and B1 is decided, so the three tenses
move together: CLAUDE.md for what mediacontrols now is, the skill for
what to run, NOTES.md for what was measured and when.

The entry worth reading is the one that disproves a claim written here
earlier in the same session. Dropping x86_64 was expected to make
make android-install fail with INSTALL_FAILED_NO_MATCHING_ABIS.
Measured, it installs and launches: Google's google_apis x86_64 images
carry arm64 translation (abilist = x86_64,arm64-v8a), so the loader
maps lib/arm64/libwails.so and runs it. It dies before any of our code
with SIGILL, and the disassembly names the reason exactly --
`mrs x0, ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1`, Go's internal/cpu reading the arm64 feature
register at runtime init, which the translator does not implement. So
no Go binary starts under it, and that is not a property of this app.

Which closes the last plausible shortcut. There are now three distinct
ways this app fails on an x86_64 Android -- seccomp on the x86_64
build, an unimplemented system register on the translated arm64 one,
and a real device still unverified -- and none of them is a bug in it.
A phone remains the only verification path.

Plan 016 also carries the B2 scope, now decided rather than
recommended: option 1's data model with option 2's surface. The phone
gets home, library browse, now-playing-as-a-view, the queue, search and
playlists; it does not get autotag, downloads, Explore or the 93-control
Settings page, and each of those has a reason written beside it. One
rule for the work: no view forks, because a phone template that copies
a view's is two templates to fix every bug in.
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-16 22:26:39 -04:00
parent c99c8efa11
commit df2e9ea777
5 changed files with 404 additions and 46 deletions
+169
View File
@@ -2659,3 +2659,172 @@ it. So the arm64 claim above rests on reading modernc's two code paths,
not on having run it: verifying the shipped ABI needs an arm64 host, a
physical device, or `adb connect` to one. The image was deleted again;
do not re-download it.
## Android media controls need no new JNI and no new dependency (2026-08-16)
Plan 016's A4 — playback that survives the screen locking — turned out
to be reachable entirely through seams that already exist, which is the
finding worth keeping. The obvious blocker is that Wails' `androidBridge*`
helpers are unexported, so Go cannot call arbitrary Java. It does not
need to:
- **Go → Java** is `application.Android.StartForegroundService(json)`,
which *is* exported, and `build/android/` is our tree — so widening
the JSON that `WailsBridge.startForegroundService` accepts is a local
edit, not a fork of the runtime.
- **Java → Go** is `WailsBridge.emitEvent(name, json)` →
`nativeEmitEvent` → `app.Event.Emit`, which a Go `app.Event.On`
subscriber receives with `Data` as a `map[string]any`.
So the handler is one JSON document out and one command event back, and
`backend/mediacontrols`' existing `Handler`/`Callbacks` interface — written
for MPRIS — needed one addition (`OnDuck`) to cover a MediaSession.
**The Java side needs no androidx.media either.** `MediaSessionCompat`
is the documented route, but `android.media.session.MediaSession` and
`Notification.MediaStyle` are both API 21 and minSdk here is 21, so the
platform API covers it with two `Build.VERSION` branches (the channel,
and PendingIntent mutability flags) and no new Gradle dependency.
Four things measured or reasoned along the way, each of which would
have been a bug:
- **From API 26 the framework ducks the app itself** and sends no
`AUDIOFOCUS_LOSS_TRANSIENT_CAN_DUCK`. So a duck implemented in the
player is a *pre-Oreo* path, and `setWillPauseWhenDucked(true)` —
which is how you get the callback back — would mean pausing for
every notification tone. Implementing both attenuates twice.
- **A duck must not touch the user's volume.** `Player.SetDuck` holds
the attenuation as a separate offset and re-applies the user's level
through `setVolumeLocked`, so it cannot accumulate across repeated
ducks and `getUserVolume` — which feeds the event, the persisted
state and every relative change — still reports what the user chose.
- **From Android 12 a background app may not *start* a foreground
service**, but it may keep delivering intents to one already running.
Every update after the first is exactly that case (a track change
with the screen off), so `WailsBridge` picks `startService` over
`startForegroundService` once `WailsForegroundService.running` is set.
- **A service started with `startForegroundService` that returns from
`onStartCommand` without calling `startForeground` is killed**, so
the transport-button intents call it too rather than only the payload
path.
**`make lint` does not see any of this.** Its three passes are the app,
`indexbuild` and `dev` tag sets, all on linux/amd64, and `android.go` is
behind the `android` build tag — the only thing that compiles it is the
cross-compiler in `make android`. That is why the payload keys, the
state words and the command names live in `androidpayload.go` *without*
a build tag, with a test: it is the half that can be checked on the
machine doing the work. A quick manual check of the tagged half is
```bash
B=$(echo /opt/android-ndk/toolchains/llvm/prebuilt/*/bin)
CC=$B/aarch64-linux-android21-clang CXX=$B/aarch64-linux-android21-clang++ \
GOOS=android GOARCH=arm64 CGO_ENABLED=1 go build ./backend/...
```
— `CXX` matters: without it the oboe C++ sources compile against the
host sysroot and fail on `android/log.h`, which reads like a missing NDK.
**None of it has run.** The APK builds for both ABIs and the Go and Java
halves compile; everything above about behaviour is read from the
Android documentation and the source. The x86_64 emulator still cannot
run this app (modernc `lstat`/seccomp, above) and an arm64 AVD still
cannot exist on an x86_64 host, so A4's first real test is a device.
## Dropping x86_64 cut the APK by 41% (measured 2026-08-16)
Plan 016's B1, decided: the ABI is gone.
| | fat (arm64 + x86_64) | arm64 only |
|---|---|---|
| `bin/yellowjacket.apk` | 27,059,130 B | 15,898,465 B |
| `lib/` entries | 2 | 1 |
It buys nothing to keep. x86_64 Android takes SIGSYS the first time it
touches the database (modernc's raw `lstat` against Android's seccomp
filter, above), which is *every* x86_64 device — emulators and x86
Chromebooks alike — not merely the emulator here.
Three places had to agree, and the third is the one that would have
made this a silent no-op: `abiFilters` in `build/android/app/
build.gradle` (what Gradle packages), `android:package` rather than
`android:package:fat` in the Makefile (what Go compiles — otherwise the
31 MB library is still built and then discarded), and the `native-code`
assertion in `android-apk.yml`'s Verify step, which is now
`native-code: 'arm64-v8a'$` and fails if a second ABI ever comes back.
The anchor is deliberate and was checked against a real artifact:
without it the pattern also matches the fat APK's line.
One consequence for the dev tier was written down before it was
checked, and checking it proved it false — see the next entry.
## arm64 translation runs Go until Go asks the CPU what it is (measured 2026-08-16)
Predicted, when the x86_64 ABI was dropped: `make android-install`
against the emulator would now fail with
`INSTALL_FAILED_NO_MATCHING_ABIS`. **Measured: it installs and
launches.** Google's `google_apis` x86_64 images carry arm64
translation —
```
ro.product.cpu.abilist = x86_64,arm64-v8a
```
— so the loader maps `lib/arm64/libwails.so` and executes it; the
tombstone confirms it with `ABI: 'x86_64'` / `Guest architecture:
'arm64'`.
It dies anyway, before a line of our code, and the instruction says
exactly why. The fault is at `libwails.so+0x15911d0`:
```
signal 4 (SIGILL), code -6 (SI_TKILL)
15911d0: d5380600 mrs x0, ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1
```
That is Go's `internal/cpu` reading the arm64 feature-ID system
register during runtime init. The translator does not implement it, so
**no Go binary starts under it** — this is not a property of this app
and no work here would change it. (`code -6 (SI_TKILL)` also means the
signal was re-raised by the process itself: Go's handler caught the
SIGILL, printed a traceback to a stdout that goes to `/dev/null`, and
re-raised. The invisible-failure rule again.)
So there are now three distinct ways this app fails on an x86_64
Android, none of them a bug in it:
| build | cause | signal |
|---|---|---|
| x86_64 | modernc's raw `lstat` vs seccomp | SIGSYS, syscall 6 |
| arm64, translated | Go reads `ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1` | SIGILL |
| arm64, real device | — | still unverified |
**A physical arm64 device is still the only verification path**, which
is the conclusion the previous session reached by a different route.
The value of this entry is that it closes the remaining plausible
shortcut, with the instruction that closes it.
### Two bugs the attempt found in the harness itself
Both were on `main`, and the first had made the whole tier unusable
since the commit that added it.
**`scripts/android-emulator.sh` did not parse.** A `case` pattern read
`*signatures do not match*)`, and `do` is a reserved word: bash fails
the parse of the *entire file*, so `make android-emulator`,
`android-install`, `android-smoke` and `android-logs` all died with
`line 190: syntax error near unexpected token 'do'`. Quoting the inner
words fixes it. A shell script that is only run interactively can carry
a syntax error indefinitely — `bash -n` in the pre-commit hook would
have caught it, and does not exist.
**A bare `adb` addresses whatever is attached.** With a second emulator
present (another project's, or a stale `offline` entry from a previous
run), every adb call fails with "more than one device", and
`cmd_install` reported that as *"no device — run 'make
android-emulator' first"* — directly after that had printed "waiting
for boot ok". `pick_device` now resolves `ANDROID_SERIAL` from
`ro.boot.qemu.avd_name`, since serials are assigned in boot order and
the AVD name is the stable identity. Verified with both emulators
running: it selects `yj-test` and installs.
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
# 016 — What Android parity would actually take
> **Status: A1, A2 and A3 are done** (commit "let the app reach the
> user's music"). The direction taken is **option 1, the full
> librarian**: `MANAGE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE` plus an in-app folder browser,
> which keeps the path-keyed model intact. A4 (MediaSession and audio
> focus) and B1/B2 remain. The sections below are kept as written,
> because they are the argument the decision rests on — see "What is
> left" at the end for the current state.
> **Status: all of section A is done.** A1A3 landed with "let the app
> reach the user's music"; A4 (MediaSession, transport notification,
> audio focus) landed with "survive the screen locking". The direction
> taken is **option 1, the full librarian**: `MANAGE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE`
> plus an in-app folder browser, which keeps the path-keyed model
> intact. B1/B2 remain, both awaiting a decision rather than work. The
> sections below are kept as written, because they are the argument the
> decision rests on — see "What is left" at the end for the current
> state.
Plan 015 shipped a *pipeline*: the app cross-compiles, is signed and
versioned, and publishes from CI. This is the assessment of what stands
@@ -194,6 +196,56 @@ option 3 if the goal is the least work for the most value. Option 1 is
the only one that answers "feature parity" literally, and it is the one
worth arguing hardest against.
> **Decided:** option 1's *data model* (the librarian keeps its
> filesystem and its scanner — A1 shipped that) with option 2's
> *surface*. The phone is a player over the library this app already
> builds; it does not get every view. The list is below.
## The phone gets a subset (decided)
B2 is not a stylesheet pass and not a second front end either. A view
is already a lazily-loaded chunk behind `VIEW_LOADERS` /
`DETAIL_LOADERS` in `index.ts`, and the stores and bindings are shared,
so the phone build is **a different loader table and a different
chrome**, over the same stores.
**In**, because each is something a person does with a phone in their
hand:
- **Home** — the shelves are already a phone-shaped surface.
- **Library browse** — albums, artists, genres. The grids are already
virtualized and card-shaped.
- **Now playing** — which on a phone is a *view*, not a 4em bar.
- **The queue.**
- **Search** — the header box, scoped as it already is.
- **Playlists**, including smart ones, as lists to play rather than to
edit.
**Out**, and each for a reason rather than by omission:
- **Autotag** — the review UI is a wide table and the action rewrites
files on disk; B3 has not been verified even as *possible* yet.
- **Downloads** — two tab panels of client configuration.
- **Explore** — the catalog is a ~0.6 GB download (B4); browsing it is
the last thing to earn a phone's storage.
- **Settings** — not the page. The phone needs a handful of settings
(theme, the library folder, playback) and not the 93 controls the
desktop page carries.
- **Jobs**, **shortcuts overlay**, **column configuration** — a phone
has no keyboard and no resizable columns, and the jobs indicator is
enough.
What the shell has to lose, from the audit at the top of this section:
the 800×600 minimum, the 11-item sidebar (a phone wants a bottom tab
bar over the five things above), hover as a route to anything,
right-click as the only route to a context menu (long-press is the
gesture), and ctrl/shift multi-select.
One rule for the work: **no view forks.** A phone layout that copies a
view's template is two templates to fix every bug in. Where a view
cannot serve both, the split belongs at the chunk boundary that already
exists.
## What is worth doing regardless of that decision
Cheap, independently useful, and each unblocks measurement:
@@ -212,37 +264,68 @@ Cheap, independently useful, and each unblocks measurement:
behaviour.
## What is left (updated after A1-A3)
## What is left (updated after A4)
**A4, playback that survives the screen locking.** The manifest and the
service are typed `mediaPlayback` now and the permission is declared,
so the foundation is in place; what is missing is a `MediaSession`, a
transport notification and audio-focus handling. The plumbing for it
exists and needs no new JNI: Go can call
`application.Android.StartForegroundService(json)` (exported by Wails),
and Java can call `WailsBridge.emitEvent(name, json)` back into the
application event bus, which Go subscribes to. So the shape is a JSON
payload of title/artist/state going out and transport commands coming
back, with `backend/mediacontrols` gaining an Android handler beside
the MPRIS one — the interface it already defines is the right shape.
**A4 is done.** `backend/mediacontrols/android.go` is a `Handler`
beside the MPRIS one, and the Java half is
`WailsForegroundService.java`: a `MediaSession`, a `MediaStyle`
transport notification and audio focus. It needed no new JNI and no new
Gradle dependency — `application.Android.StartForegroundService(json)`
going out, `WailsBridge.emitEvent` → the application event bus coming
back, and the platform `android.media.session` API rather than
androidx.media, which minSdk 21 makes available anyway.
Audio focus is the half that is easy to forget and the more important
one: pause on a phone call, duck for a notification, pause on headphone
unplug. `oto` will happily keep writing to a stream nobody can hear.
Four decisions in it are worth keeping:
**B1, the x86_64 half of the APK**, which cannot run on any Android
because of the modernc `lstat` seccomp trap. Still undecided; dropping
it is a five-minute change that halves the artifact.
- **Ducking is a player concept, not a volume change.**
`Player.SetDuck` re-applies the *user's* level with an attenuation
offset, so `getUserVolume` still reports what the user chose and
nothing is persisted or emitted. A duck that wrote through to the
volume would let one notification tone permanently turn the music
down.
- **The duck path is pre-Oreo only.** From API 26 the framework ducks
the app itself and sends no `CAN_DUCK` focus change, so asking to be
told instead (`setWillPauseWhenDucked`) would mean pausing for every
notification tone, and doing both would attenuate twice.
- **An unchanged payload is not an event here either.** Every push
crosses JNI and re-delivers an Intent, and the player pushes state on
several paths that can agree.
- **After the first start, updates use `startService`.** From Android
12 an app in the background may not *start* a foreground service, but
it may keep delivering intents to one it already has — which is every
track change with the screen off.
**B2, the desktop shell.** Untouched and the largest remaining piece.
The contract with Java — the payload keys, the state words, the command
names — is in `androidpayload.go`, deliberately *without* the `android`
build tag, so `go test` exercises it on every platform. Everything left
in `android.go` is untested by construction: it compiles only under a
cross-compiler and runs only on a phone.
**B1 is done: x86_64 is dropped.** 27.1 MB → 15.9 MB, measured. Three
places had to agree — `abiFilters`, the Makefile's `android:package`
(or Go still compiles a library Gradle then discards) and the
`native-code: 'arm64-v8a'$` assertion in `android-apk.yml`, whose
anchor is what stops it also matching the fat APK's line. Adding the
ABI back, if modernc ever fixes `Xlstat64`, is those same three edits.
**B2, the desktop shell.** The largest remaining piece, and the scope
is now decided — see "The phone gets a subset" below.
**B3/B4** are unchanged, and B3 is now *possible* where it was not:
with all-files access, `tagwriter` can write in place.
### What A1-A3 did not answer
### What none of section A answered
Nothing here has been observed on a device. The permission flow in
particular is the kind of thing that behaves differently across OEM
builds — `ACTION_MANAGE_APP_ALL_FILES_ACCESS_PERMISSION` is
implemented inconsistently, which is why there is a fallback to the
global list, and neither path has been exercised.
A4 adds its own list of things only a device can answer, and they are
the likely first failures: whether the notification appears at all
(POST_NOTIFICATIONS is requested from `startForegroundService`, so a
user who declines gets a service with an invisible notification),
whether audio focus arrives while `oto`/oboe holds the output, whether
the lock screen picks up the session, and whether cover art decoded
from a `MANAGE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE` path is readable by the service.