diff --git a/build/android/app/src/main/java/com/wails/app/MainActivity.java b/build/android/app/src/main/java/com/wails/app/MainActivity.java
index 0840ded..9c84164 100644
--- a/build/android/app/src/main/java/com/wails/app/MainActivity.java
+++ b/build/android/app/src/main/java/com/wails/app/MainActivity.java
@@ -891,13 +891,41 @@ public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
         }
     }
 
+    /**
+     * The activity going away is not the app shutting down.
+     *
+     * <p>The scaffold called {@code bridge.shutdown()} here, which is
+     * the natural reading of onDestroy and is wrong for this app twice
+     * over. Android destroys and recreates an activity for a
+     * configuration change the manifest does not declare, under memory
+     * pressure, and on every background if the user has "Don't keep
+     * activities" on -- all **without restarting the process**. And
+     * when the user really does leave, this app's reason for existing
+     * in the background is that a song is playing, which is what the
+     * {@code mediaPlayback} foreground service is holding the process
+     * alive for. Either way, tearing the Go side down here would stop
+     * the music.
+     *
+     * <p>It was harmless only by accident: {@code nativeShutdown} calls
+     * {@code App.Quit()}, whose Android {@code destroy()} is an empty
+     * method, and {@code Run()}'s deferred {@code shutdownServices()}
+     * can never fire because Android's {@code platformRun} is
+     * {@code select{}} and does not return. So no {@code
+     * ServiceShutdown} has ever run on Android, and removing this call
+     * changes nothing today -- it stops the day someone implements
+     * {@code destroy()} from silently killing playback on a rotation.
+     *
+     * <p>There is no callback for "the process is going away"; Android
+     * simply kills it. Durability on this platform is the persist
+     * writers, which submit on every mutation rather than at exit.
+     *
+     * <p>See #52, and CLAUDE.md, "An activity is a view onto the
+     * process".
+     */
     @Override
     protected void onDestroy() {
         super.onDestroy();
         unregisterSystemEventReceivers();
-        if (bridge != null) {
-            bridge.shutdown();
-        }
         if (webView != null) {
             webView.destroy();
         }
diff --git a/build/android/app/src/main/java/com/wails/app/WailsBridge.java b/build/android/app/src/main/java/com/wails/app/WailsBridge.java
index 6198770..ce912cc 100644
--- a/build/android/app/src/main/java/com/wails/app/WailsBridge.java
+++ b/build/android/app/src/main/java/com/wails/app/WailsBridge.java
@@ -129,7 +129,24 @@ public class WailsBridge {
     }
 
     /**
-     * Initialize the native Go library
+     * Initialize the native Go library.
+     *
+     * <p><b>{@code initialized} is deliberately per-instance, and making
+     * it {@code static} is the trap this comment exists for.</b> A
+     * recreated activity builds a new bridge and calls this again, in a
+     * process where the native library is already loaded and Go's
+     * {@code main()} is already running -- so "initialise once per
+     * process" looks like exactly the right rule. It is not, because
+     * {@code nativeInit} does <i>two</i> things: it runs
+     * {@code go mainFunc()}, and it stores the global JNI reference to
+     * <i>this</i> bridge. Skip it and Go keeps executing JavaScript
+     * against the destroyed activity's WebView: the app opens, renders,
+     * and never receives another backend event.
+     *
+     * <p>So this is called every time, and the half that must not repeat
+     * is latched on the Go side instead, at the top of {@code main()} --
+     * which is also where the damage was ({@code os.Exit(1)}), and the
+     * only place that can see it. See #52.
      */
     public void initialize() {
         if (initialized) {