test(e2e): cover configurable destinations; stop assuming a nav item

The assertions are about the navigation, not about the setting: "the
config was saved" is the plumbing, and #69 and #72 both shipped green
under specs that measured exactly that.

Four existing specs reached a view by clicking its nav item, which since
this change is not guaranteed to exist -- Autotag is hidden by default
and Downloads is absent without a download client -- so they timed out
waiting for a locator that will never resolve. `navigateTo` dispatches
the app's own `navigate` event, which is what every nav item, card and
detail view dispatches, so it is the mechanism rather than a test-only
door. Click the item when the nav is the subject.

Closes #25
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-19 19:33:56 -04:00
parent 43d78a731a
commit c8d94a8203
5 changed files with 162 additions and 6 deletions
+7 -2
View File
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ import {
eventNames,
resetEvents,
waitForEvent,
navigateTo,
} from '../support/fixtures.js';
/**
@@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ test.describe('view lifecycle', () => {
test('a keypress on Settings does not reach the Autotag queue', async ({
app,
}) => {
await app.getByTestId('nav-autotag').click();
// By event, not by nav item: Autotag is hidden by default (#25)
// and a hidden view is still reachable.
await navigateTo(app, 'autotag');
await expect(app.getByTestId('main-content')).toHaveAttribute(
'data-active-view',
'autotag',
@@ -83,7 +86,9 @@ test.describe('view lifecycle', () => {
// The other half of the same bug (H-2): two document keydown handlers
// with no arbitration meant `s` on this page skipped the album *and*
// toggled shuffle. As a panel binding it can only mean one thing.
await app.getByTestId('nav-autotag').click();
// By event, not by nav item: Autotag is hidden by default (#25)
// and a hidden view is still reachable.
await navigateTo(app, 'autotag');
await expect
.poll(() => pendingCount(app))
.toMatch(/^Pending \(\d+\)$/);