feat(autotag): answer whether an album has a confident match

`MatchForAlbum(albumID)` is the question the album detail page needs to
ask on open: does the autotagger already have something confident to
say about this album, and what would applying it do.

**It costs no MusicBrainz request.** Everything it needs is on disk —
`tagging_items` carries the top score and release from the background
prefetch, `tagging_candidates` durably holds the scored list. The rate
limiters here are shared with every page the user can open, so a lookup
that fires on page load must not join that queue; a folder nobody has
scored yet answers "nothing", rather than scoring it now.

**The tier is computed, not read.** `tagging_items.score` is the raw
number and `Recommend` is what turns it into a claim, capping it for an
ambiguous runner-up, an incomplete alignment or a folder too small to
corroborate itself. Filtering on the stored score would promise
confidence the scorer had explicitly withheld — which the two-track
test pins.

**Nothing is said about an album the user has already answered for.**
Only a `pending` group qualifies: `confirmed` covers both a finished
apply and an explicit "leave as is", and arguing with the second would
be actively wrong.

The join is `audio_files.group_key`, not a key derived from the folder
path, because a group carved out of a mixed-bag folder is keyed on its
tags — so a path-derived key would find nothing for exactly the
messiest libraries this helps. `GroupCount` is returned because a
multi-disc album is one group per disc: a caller that applied to "the
album" from a single button would retag one disc of three.

frontend/bindings/yellowjacket/backend/autotagservice/index.ts

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ export {
 };
 
 export type {
+    AlbumMatchView,
     AlignmentView,
     ApplyResultView,
     CandidateView,

frontend/bindings/yellowjacket/backend/autotagservice/models.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,61 @@
 // Cynhyrchwyd y ffeil hon yn awtomatig. PEIDIWCH Â MODIWL
 // This file is automatically generated. DO NOT EDIT
 
+/**
+ * AlbumMatchView is "the autotagger already has a confident match for
+ * the album you are looking at".
+ * 
+ * It is deliberately not a score. The album page renders a suggestion,
+ * and a suggestion has to be actionable: which release, what it is
+ * called, and whether acting on it here would do the whole album or
+ * only part of it.
+ */
+export interface AlbumMatchView {
+    /**
+     * GroupKey is the tagging group the actions operate on.
+     */
+    "groupKey": string;
+
+    /**
+     * Recommendation is the tier, as a string, for a caller that
+     * wants to render the strength rather than trust the filter.
+     */
+    "recommendation": string;
+
+    /**
+     * Score is the top candidate's raw score, 0..1.
+     */
+    "score": number;
+
+    /**
+     * ReleaseMBID is the release Apply would write.
+     */
+    "releaseMbid": string;
+
+    /**
+     * Title and ArtistCredit name that release, so the banner can say
+     * what it is offering rather than "a match".
+     */
+    "title": string;
+    "artistCredit": string;
+
+    /**
+     * TrackCount is the group's local track count.
+     */
+    "trackCount": number;
+
+    /**
+     * GroupCount is how many tagging groups this album spans.
+     * 
+     * More than one means a multi-disc album (one group per disc), and
+     * it is the reason this is a field rather than an implementation
+     * detail: applying "the album" from a single button would retag
+     * one disc of three and leave the folder holding a mix of old and
+     * new tags. The caller offers review instead.
+     */
+    "groupCount": number;
+}
+
 /**
  * AlignmentView mirrors autotag.TrackAlignment.  LocalIndex of -1
  * means "candidate has this track, folder doesn't" (status=missing).

frontend/bindings/yellowjacket/backend/autotagservice/service.ts

@@ -160,6 +160,39 @@ export function ListPendingFolders(libraryID: number): $CancellablePromise<$mode
     return $Call.ByID(617511590, libraryID);
 }
 
+/**
+ * MatchForAlbum answers "does the autotagger have something confident
+ * to say about this album", for the album detail page.
+ * 
+ * Three things about it are load-bearing.
+ * 
+ * **It costs no MusicBrainz request.** Everything it needs is already
+ * on disk: `tagging_items` carries the top score and release from the
+ * background prefetch, and `tagging_candidates` durably holds the
+ * scored list. The rate limiters here are shared with every page the
+ * user can open, so a lookup that fires on page load must not join
+ * that queue — which also means this returns nothing for a folder
+ * nobody has scored yet, rather than scoring it now. That is the
+ * right trade: the prefetch will get to it, and a page that silently
+ * spends a minute of somebody's MusicBrainz budget to draw a banner
+ * is worse than a page that says nothing.
+ * 
+ * **The tier is computed, not read.** `tagging_items.score` is the raw
+ * number and `Recommend` is what turns it into a claim — capping it
+ * for an ambiguous runner-up, an incomplete alignment or a folder too
+ * small to corroborate itself. Filtering on the raw score would
+ * promise confidence the scorer had explicitly withheld.
+ * 
+ * **Nothing is said about an album the user has already answered
+ * for.** Only a `pending` group qualifies: `confirmed` covers both a
+ * finished apply and an explicit "leave as is", and `skipped` is the
+ * user saying not now. Re-offering either is nagging, and "leave as
+ * is" would be actively wrong to argue with.
+ */
+export function MatchForAlbum(albumID: number): $CancellablePromise<$models.AlbumMatchView | null> {
+    return $Call.ByID(514173221, albumID);
+}
+
 /**
  * RetagGroup flips a group back to 'pending' so the user can
  * re-review after an apply or skip.  Drops the durably-cached