fix(ui): keep a touch-only affordance reachable, or absent

Three controls are revealed by :hover and are the only route to their
action on a device that has none. #68 hid the home card's play button on
touch, which was right because tapping the card does the same thing;
these are the opposite case, so hiding them removes the action outright
and leaving them costs the same long-press flash #68 was filed for --
they are visibility:hidden / opacity:0, so on touch they are invisible
controls that still take taps.

track-details' cover-art overlay and remove, and shortcut-capture's
reset, are always visible under `@media not all and (hover: hover)`.

The queue row's remove is the third case the report names and takes the
other treatment, because #60 has since landed: the row's context menu is
a bottom sheet carrying "Remove from Queue", so the action is one
long-press away and an always-visible X would spend part of a 424px row
on something already reachable. It is display:none outside
`(hover: hover) and (pointer: fine)` rather than visibility:hidden,
which would leave a button holding its hit area and its place in the
accessibility tree -- the trap this issue is about.

The rule is not extracted into styles/ yet: that leaves two call sites
of the always-visible form, under the four the report names.

No tier here can render as a touch device, so the tests read the parsed
stylesheet the way #68's does and say so; the touch and hover renderings
were measured against the running app in a hasTouch context instead.

Closes #137

CLAUDE.md

@@ -1462,6 +1462,32 @@ vary) wins, ours being told from theirs by **identity** rather than
 that ends the gesture is swallowed, keyed on the gesture rather than on
 a time window so the first tap on the menu it opened is not eaten too.
 
+**A control revealed by `:hover` is gated on the device having hover,
+and which way round depends on whether it is the only route to its
+action.** The gate itself is not optional: a touch long-press
+synthesises a hover state in the WebView, so every one of these flashed
+into view during the 500 ms hold above — a control appearing because
+the user was reaching for a different one. Where the action is reachable
+another way the control is **absent** on a touch device (the home card's
+play button, #68; the queue row's remove, which the row's bottom-sheet
+menu carries since #60), and that is `display: none` outside
+`(hover: hover) and (pointer: fine)` rather than `opacity: 0` or
+`visibility: hidden`, both of which leave a button holding its hit area
+and its place in the accessibility tree. Where the control is the
+**only** route it is instead always visible under
+`@media not all and (hover: hover)` — `track-details`'s cover-art
+overlay and remove, `shortcut-capture`'s reset (#137) — because hiding
+it takes the action away entirely.
+
+One thing to know before checking either: **no tier here can render as a
+touch device.** CDP's `Emulation.setEmulatedMedia` does not reach the
+component tier's iframe, and the e2e projects are Desktop Chrome and
+Desktop Safari, neither of which has touch. So
+`hover-affordance.test.ts` asserts the *parsed stylesheet* — which rule
+sits inside which media query — and says so; the regression it exists
+for is someone hoisting a rule out of its query as a tidy-up, which
+nothing on a desktop renders differently.
+
 Three lists had no focused row to open a menu *from* — the queue panel
 and both playlist detail views — and gained a roving tab stop through
 `utils/roving-rows.ts`. **`track-list` deliberately does not use it**: