build(frontend): fail css-check on a nested rule the phone drops

The device renders in Chrome 113, which predates relaxed CSS nesting, so
a nested rule whose selector starts with an element name is not a parse
error anyone would notice -- the rule simply does not exist, there and
nowhere else. Three were live in `index.css`, and the one that mattered
was the `text-overflow: ellipsis` on the bottom bar's title and artist,
which had therefore never truncated on the device. No tier here can see
the class at all: the component tier, the e2e tier and `make ui-visual`
all run a current engine, where the rule applies normally.

So `make css-check` carries a second script. It reads `index.css` and
the `css` literals in `src/**/*.ts` alike, since a shadow-root
stylesheet is parsed by the same engine, and it names the file, the line
and the fix -- a leading `&`, which is valid in both syntaxes.

The detection walks blocks rather than matching lines, and both things
it has to get right fall out of one rule: a rule is nested when a
*style* rule is somewhere above it, not when its immediate parent is a
block. That leaves `@media (...) { bottom-nav { ... } }` at the top
level alone, which is the majority of what a regex over the file would
report, and still flags the same rule inside an at-rule that is itself
inside a style rule. Strings and comments are read through, so a brace
in a `url()` is not a block.

The tree has no violation left, so the check would pass just as happily
over an empty glob: it refuses one, and `test/utils/css-nesting.test.ts`
pins the semantics that make the sweep mean something. The literal
scanner the two checks share is lifted into `css-literals.mjs`
unchanged, except that a `${}` substitution is now blanked keeping its
newlines so a line number survives it.

Closes #154

CLAUDE.md

@@ -3444,6 +3444,24 @@ android-inspect` forwards the WebView's devtools socket and `make
 android-eval` asks the real page — raw CDP, because `connectOverCDP`
 calls `Browser.setDownloadBehavior` and a WebView refuses it.
 
+**One of those gaps is checked rather than remembered.** A nested rule
+whose selector starts with an element name is not a parse error anyone
+would notice on 113 — the rule simply does not exist, there and nowhere
+else, which is how the bottom bar's `text-overflow: ellipsis` came to
+have never truncated on the device. `make css-check`
+(`frontend/scripts/check-css-nesting.mjs`, a pre-commit hook and a CI
+step) fails on one, over `index.css` and the `css` literals alike, and
+says the fix is a leading `&` — valid in both syntaxes, so no nested
+rule here has a reason to omit it. Two things it has to get right, and
+both follow from asking whether a *style* rule is anywhere above rather
+than what the immediate parent is: `@media (…) { bottom-nav { … } }` at
+the top level is an ordinary rule and is the majority of what a regex
+over the file would report, while the same rule one level inside
+`.bar { @media (…) { … } }` is nested and is flagged. The check is the
+cheap version of the answer; a build-time downlevel (Lightning CSS
+targeting 113) would fix the class permanently and is a dependency and
+a build step rather than twenty lines.
+
 `build/config.yml`'s `version` is the
 *metadata* version and is not what the app reports — `main.version` is
 stamped at link time from the packaging recipe's git-derived version.