feat(dev): ask the phone instead of looking at it
Build & publish Arch package / arch-package (push) Successful in 2m29s
CI / check (push) Successful in 2m26s
Search index maintenance / maintain-index (push) Successful in 7s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 5m53s

The device tier could only take a screenshot and read what Go chose to
log, and a screenshot cannot tell a dropped CSS declaration from a
missing asset. This adds the third thing: the page's own answer, from
the engine that is really rendering it.

`make android-screenshot` grabs the screen, `make android-inspect`
forwards the WebView's devtools socket, and `make android-eval EXPR=...`
evaluates in the real page.

Four details are load-bearing. Only a `debuggable` build opens that
socket, so the debug build type takes `applicationIdSuffix ".dev"` and
installs *beside* the release app -- the two carry different signing
certificates, and Android's only remedy for a changed certificate is an
uninstall, which takes the user's library with it. Playwright cannot
drive a WebView (`connectOverCDP` calls `Browser.setDownloadBehavior`,
which it answers "Browser context management is not supported"), so the
eval is raw CDP over Node's built-in WebSocket. The socket name carries
the pid, so it is resolved per launch rather than written down. And
`exec-out`, not `shell`, for the screenshot: a pty translates LF and
corrupts the PNG.

What it immediately established is why it was worth having. The phone
renders in Chrome 113 at 424x439 CSS px -- two years behind every
browser the other tiers use, with no Popover API and no relaxed CSS
nesting -- so a spec passing at that viewport says nothing about the
device, and two conclusions drawn from version numbers alone were wrong.
Both are corrected in NOTES.md and the plan.
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-17 05:13:21 -04:00
parent b1cdef8769
commit 0bfa2136be
8 changed files with 322 additions and 9 deletions
@@ -360,9 +360,14 @@ awaiting the next APK for confirmation (`NOTES.md`, same date):
`webView.canGoBack()`; the frontend had never used `history`. A
navigation is a history entry now, and `navStack` is gone rather than
kept beside it.
- **The transport was under the gesture bar.** `targetSdk 35` is
edge-to-edge by force; `applyWindowInsets()` in `MainActivity` pads
by `systemBars | displayCutout | ime`.
- **The transport was under the gesture bar** — or so the version
number said. `applyWindowInsets()` in `MainActivity` is right and
stays, but the phone is **Android 14**, where the system still insets
the window: the fix is pre-emptive and the symptom has another cause.
Still open, along with icons that do not appear at all. The phone's
WebView is **Chrome 113**, which is the lead (no Popover API, no
relaxed CSS nesting), and `make android-inspect` / `android-eval` are
how it gets asked.
The standing item is unchanged in kind: **B3 (tag writing) and the
permission flow still need a device**, and so does confirming these two.